Avoiding wasted research resources in conservation science
Abstract Scientific evidence is fundamental for guiding effective conservation action to curb biodiversity loss. Yet, research resources in conservation are often wasted due to biased allocation of research effort, irrelevant or low‐priority questions, flawed studies, inaccessible research outputs,...
Main Authors: | Rachel T. Buxton, Elizabeth A. Nyboer, Karine E. Pigeon, Graham D. Raby, Trina Rytwinski, Austin J. Gallagher, Richard Schuster, Hsien‐Yung Lin, Lenore Fahrig, Joseph R. Bennett, Steven J. Cooke, Dominique G. Roche |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2021-02-01
|
Series: | Conservation Science and Practice |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.329 |
Similar Items
-
Metadata and Reuse: Antidotes to Information Entropy
by: Ted Habermann
Published: (2020-04-01) -
Ten principles for generating accessible and useable COVID‐19 environmental science and a fit‐for‐purpose evidence base
by: Andrew N. Kadykalo, et al.
Published: (2021-01-01) -
Spotlight on Digital Government Information Preservation: Examining the Context, Outcomes, Limitations, and Successes of the DataRefuge Movement
by: Eric Johnson, et al.
Published: (2018-02-01) -
Open government data and environmental science: a federal Canadian perspective
by: Dominique G. Roche, et al.
Published: (2020-11-01) -
Reuse of Research Data in Iran: Elements and Requirements
by: Ameneh soleimani, et al.
Published: (2020-06-01)