Optimal estimator for assessing landslide model performance

The commonly used success rate (SR) in evaluating cell-based landslide model performance is based on the ratio of successfully predicted landslide sites over total actual landslide sites without considering the performance in predicting stable cells. We proposed a modified SR (MSR), in which the per...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: J. C. Huang, S. J. Kao
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2006-01-01
Series:Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
Online Access:http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/10/957/2006/hess-10-957-2006.pdf
id doaj-f305778f90614174906516f303670e19
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f305778f90614174906516f303670e192020-11-25T00:47:13ZengCopernicus PublicationsHydrology and Earth System Sciences1027-56061607-79382006-01-01106957965Optimal estimator for assessing landslide model performanceJ. C. HuangS. J. KaoThe commonly used success rate (SR) in evaluating cell-based landslide model performance is based on the ratio of successfully predicted landslide sites over total actual landslide sites without considering the performance in predicting stable cells. We proposed a modified SR (MSR), in which the performance of stable cell prediction is included. The advantage of MSR is to avoid over- and under-prediction while upholding the stable sensitivity throughout all simulated cases. Stochastic analyses are conducted by using artificial landslide maps and simulations with a full range of performances (from worst to perfect) in both stable and unstable cell predictions. Stochastic analyses reveal mathematical responses of estimators to various model results in calculating performance. The Kappa method, which is commonly used for satellite image analysis, is improper for landslide modeling giving inconsistent performance when landslide coverage changes. To examine differences among SR and MSR in real model application, we applied the SHALSTAB model onto a mountainous watershed in Taiwan. Case study shows that stable and unstable cell predictions are inter-exclusive in SHALSTAB model. The optimal estimator should compromise landslide over- and under-prediction. According to our 4000 simulations, the best simulation generated by MSR projects 83 hits over 131 actual landslide sites while the unstable cells cover only 16% of the studied watershed. By contrast, despite the fact that the best simulation deduced from SR projects 120 hits over 131 actual landslide sites, this high performance is only obtained when unstable cells cover an incredibly high landslide cover (~75%) of the entire watershed exhibiting a significant landslide over-prediction.http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/10/957/2006/hess-10-957-2006.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author J. C. Huang
S. J. Kao
spellingShingle J. C. Huang
S. J. Kao
Optimal estimator for assessing landslide model performance
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
author_facet J. C. Huang
S. J. Kao
author_sort J. C. Huang
title Optimal estimator for assessing landslide model performance
title_short Optimal estimator for assessing landslide model performance
title_full Optimal estimator for assessing landslide model performance
title_fullStr Optimal estimator for assessing landslide model performance
title_full_unstemmed Optimal estimator for assessing landslide model performance
title_sort optimal estimator for assessing landslide model performance
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
issn 1027-5606
1607-7938
publishDate 2006-01-01
description The commonly used success rate (SR) in evaluating cell-based landslide model performance is based on the ratio of successfully predicted landslide sites over total actual landslide sites without considering the performance in predicting stable cells. We proposed a modified SR (MSR), in which the performance of stable cell prediction is included. The advantage of MSR is to avoid over- and under-prediction while upholding the stable sensitivity throughout all simulated cases. Stochastic analyses are conducted by using artificial landslide maps and simulations with a full range of performances (from worst to perfect) in both stable and unstable cell predictions. Stochastic analyses reveal mathematical responses of estimators to various model results in calculating performance. The Kappa method, which is commonly used for satellite image analysis, is improper for landslide modeling giving inconsistent performance when landslide coverage changes. To examine differences among SR and MSR in real model application, we applied the SHALSTAB model onto a mountainous watershed in Taiwan. Case study shows that stable and unstable cell predictions are inter-exclusive in SHALSTAB model. The optimal estimator should compromise landslide over- and under-prediction. According to our 4000 simulations, the best simulation generated by MSR projects 83 hits over 131 actual landslide sites while the unstable cells cover only 16% of the studied watershed. By contrast, despite the fact that the best simulation deduced from SR projects 120 hits over 131 actual landslide sites, this high performance is only obtained when unstable cells cover an incredibly high landslide cover (~75%) of the entire watershed exhibiting a significant landslide over-prediction.
url http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/10/957/2006/hess-10-957-2006.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT jchuang optimalestimatorforassessinglandslidemodelperformance
AT sjkao optimalestimatorforassessinglandslidemodelperformance
_version_ 1725261269278130176