Total elbow replacement – patient selection and perspectives

Joseph Pooley Department of Orthopaedics, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Gateshead, UK Abstract: Total joint replacements for elbow arthritis were developed in the late 1960s at the same time as total joint replacements for knee joint arthritis. Since then, there has been a continuing annual increase...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Pooley J
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2019-01-01
Series:Orthopedic Research and Reviews
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.dovepress.com/total-elbow-replacement-ndash-patient-selection-and-perspectives-peer-reviewed-article-ORR
id doaj-f323617053014ecca14ddcb6b162f05e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f323617053014ecca14ddcb6b162f05e2020-11-24T22:23:43ZengDove Medical PressOrthopedic Research and Reviews1179-14622019-01-01Volume 11234043804Total elbow replacement – patient selection and perspectivesPooley JJoseph Pooley Department of Orthopaedics, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Gateshead, UK Abstract: Total joint replacements for elbow arthritis were developed in the late 1960s at the same time as total joint replacements for knee joint arthritis. Since then, there has been a continuing annual increase in the number of patients treated with total knee joint replacement for arthritis, in line with replacement arthroplasty of the other major limb joints, but in contrast to total elbow joint replacement which is falling, since reaching a peak in the 1990s. Which raises the question, why? Continuing controversy about implant design, the relatively high reported complication rates associated with total elbow replacement (TER) and the difficulties encountered in revision surgery are identified as reasons together with changes in the patient population currently treated with TER. The purpose of this review is to explore the reasons for this in the context of the patient population requiring implant surgery for elbow arthritis and our current perspective of elbow pathology requiring treatment. This is not a systematic review of the whole of the literature concerning total elbow joint replacement arthroplasty but is drawn largely from the supporting literature that reflects my own clinical experience and illustrated with teaching materials I have commissioned together with radiographs and intraoperative photographs of patients I have treated. Keywords: elbow, arthritis, fractures, arthroscopy, arthroplastyhttps://www.dovepress.com/total-elbow-replacement-ndash-patient-selection-and-perspectives-peer-reviewed-article-ORRElbowArthritisFracturesArthroscopyArthroplasty
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Pooley J
spellingShingle Pooley J
Total elbow replacement – patient selection and perspectives
Orthopedic Research and Reviews
Elbow
Arthritis
Fractures
Arthroscopy
Arthroplasty
author_facet Pooley J
author_sort Pooley J
title Total elbow replacement – patient selection and perspectives
title_short Total elbow replacement – patient selection and perspectives
title_full Total elbow replacement – patient selection and perspectives
title_fullStr Total elbow replacement – patient selection and perspectives
title_full_unstemmed Total elbow replacement – patient selection and perspectives
title_sort total elbow replacement – patient selection and perspectives
publisher Dove Medical Press
series Orthopedic Research and Reviews
issn 1179-1462
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Joseph Pooley Department of Orthopaedics, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Gateshead, UK Abstract: Total joint replacements for elbow arthritis were developed in the late 1960s at the same time as total joint replacements for knee joint arthritis. Since then, there has been a continuing annual increase in the number of patients treated with total knee joint replacement for arthritis, in line with replacement arthroplasty of the other major limb joints, but in contrast to total elbow joint replacement which is falling, since reaching a peak in the 1990s. Which raises the question, why? Continuing controversy about implant design, the relatively high reported complication rates associated with total elbow replacement (TER) and the difficulties encountered in revision surgery are identified as reasons together with changes in the patient population currently treated with TER. The purpose of this review is to explore the reasons for this in the context of the patient population requiring implant surgery for elbow arthritis and our current perspective of elbow pathology requiring treatment. This is not a systematic review of the whole of the literature concerning total elbow joint replacement arthroplasty but is drawn largely from the supporting literature that reflects my own clinical experience and illustrated with teaching materials I have commissioned together with radiographs and intraoperative photographs of patients I have treated. Keywords: elbow, arthritis, fractures, arthroscopy, arthroplasty
topic Elbow
Arthritis
Fractures
Arthroscopy
Arthroplasty
url https://www.dovepress.com/total-elbow-replacement-ndash-patient-selection-and-perspectives-peer-reviewed-article-ORR
work_keys_str_mv AT pooleyj totalelbowreplacementndashpatientselectionandperspectives
_version_ 1725764075192844288