Open notebook science as an emerging epistemic culture within the Open Science movement

The paper addresses the concepts and practices of “open notebook science” (Bradley, 2006) as an innovation within the contemporary Open Science movement. Our research points out that open notebook science is not an incremental improvement, but it is a new “literary technology” (Shapin, Shaffer, 1985...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anne Clinio, Sarita Albagli
Format: Article
Language:fra
Published: Société Française de Sciences de l’Information et de la Communication 2017-07-01
Series:Revue Française des Sciences de l’Information et de la Communication
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/rfsic/3186
id doaj-f3460565d47c468db9b18820367c0e1a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f3460565d47c468db9b18820367c0e1a2020-11-24T21:47:06ZfraSociété Française de Sciences de l’Information et de la CommunicationRevue Française des Sciences de l’Information et de la Communication2263-08562017-07-011110.4000/rfsic.3186Open notebook science as an emerging epistemic culture within the Open Science movementAnne ClinioSarita AlbagliThe paper addresses the concepts and practices of “open notebook science” (Bradley, 2006) as an innovation within the contemporary Open Science movement. Our research points out that open notebook science is not an incremental improvement, but it is a new “literary technology” (Shapin, Shaffer, 1985) and main element of a complex open collaboration ecosystem that fosters a new epistemic culture (Knorr-Cetina, 1999). This innovation aimed to move from a “science based on trust” to a science based on transparency and data provenance - a shift that recognizes the ability of scientists in performing experiments, but mostly, values their capacity of documenting properly what they say they have done. The theoretical framework was built with the notion of epistemic culture (Knorr-Cetina, 1999) and the “three technologies” perspective used by Shapin and Shaffer (1985) to describe the construction by natural philosophers of “matter of fact” as “variety of knowledge” so powerful that became synonymous of science itself. Empirically, we entered the “open lab” through a netnography that led us to understand that the epistemic culture being engendered by its practitioners is based on a “matter of proof”.http://journals.openedition.org/rfsic/3186Open notebook scienceOpen ScienceJean-Claude Bradleyepistemic culturematter of proof
collection DOAJ
language fra
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Anne Clinio
Sarita Albagli
spellingShingle Anne Clinio
Sarita Albagli
Open notebook science as an emerging epistemic culture within the Open Science movement
Revue Française des Sciences de l’Information et de la Communication
Open notebook science
Open Science
Jean-Claude Bradley
epistemic culture
matter of proof
author_facet Anne Clinio
Sarita Albagli
author_sort Anne Clinio
title Open notebook science as an emerging epistemic culture within the Open Science movement
title_short Open notebook science as an emerging epistemic culture within the Open Science movement
title_full Open notebook science as an emerging epistemic culture within the Open Science movement
title_fullStr Open notebook science as an emerging epistemic culture within the Open Science movement
title_full_unstemmed Open notebook science as an emerging epistemic culture within the Open Science movement
title_sort open notebook science as an emerging epistemic culture within the open science movement
publisher Société Française de Sciences de l’Information et de la Communication
series Revue Française des Sciences de l’Information et de la Communication
issn 2263-0856
publishDate 2017-07-01
description The paper addresses the concepts and practices of “open notebook science” (Bradley, 2006) as an innovation within the contemporary Open Science movement. Our research points out that open notebook science is not an incremental improvement, but it is a new “literary technology” (Shapin, Shaffer, 1985) and main element of a complex open collaboration ecosystem that fosters a new epistemic culture (Knorr-Cetina, 1999). This innovation aimed to move from a “science based on trust” to a science based on transparency and data provenance - a shift that recognizes the ability of scientists in performing experiments, but mostly, values their capacity of documenting properly what they say they have done. The theoretical framework was built with the notion of epistemic culture (Knorr-Cetina, 1999) and the “three technologies” perspective used by Shapin and Shaffer (1985) to describe the construction by natural philosophers of “matter of fact” as “variety of knowledge” so powerful that became synonymous of science itself. Empirically, we entered the “open lab” through a netnography that led us to understand that the epistemic culture being engendered by its practitioners is based on a “matter of proof”.
topic Open notebook science
Open Science
Jean-Claude Bradley
epistemic culture
matter of proof
url http://journals.openedition.org/rfsic/3186
work_keys_str_mv AT anneclinio opennotebookscienceasanemergingepistemicculturewithintheopensciencemovement
AT saritaalbagli opennotebookscienceasanemergingepistemicculturewithintheopensciencemovement
_version_ 1725899328718897152