Assessing the usefulness of google books’ word frequencies for psycholinguistic research on word processing

In this Perspective Article we assess the usefulness of Google’s new word frequencies for word recognition research (lexical decision and word naming). We find that, despite the massive corpus on which the Google estimates are based (131 billion words from books published in the United States alone)...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marc eBrysbaert, Emmanuel eKeuleers, Boris eNew
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2011-03-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00027/full
id doaj-f3567c0e9e49480b88fa36a842af1e11
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f3567c0e9e49480b88fa36a842af1e112020-11-24T23:51:16ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782011-03-01210.3389/fpsyg.2011.000279569Assessing the usefulness of google books’ word frequencies for psycholinguistic research on word processingMarc eBrysbaert0Emmanuel eKeuleers1Boris eNew2Ghent UniversityGhent UniversityUniversité Paris Descartes, CNRS, FranceIn this Perspective Article we assess the usefulness of Google’s new word frequencies for word recognition research (lexical decision and word naming). We find that, despite the massive corpus on which the Google estimates are based (131 billion words from books published in the United States alone), the Google American English frequencies explain 11% less of the variance in the lexical decision times from the English Lexicon Project (Balota et al., 2007) than the SUBTLEX-US word frequencies, based on a corpus of 51 million words from film and television subtitles. Further analyses indicate that word frequencies derived from recent books (published after 2000) are better predictors of word processing times than frequencies based on the full corpus, and that word frequencies based on fiction books predict word processing times better than word frequencies based on the full corpus. The most predictive word frequencies from Google still do not explain more of the variance in word recognition times of undergraduate students and old adults than the subtitle-based word frequencies.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00027/fullword recognitionGoogle Books ngramslexical decisionsubtitle word frequenciessubtlexword frequency
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Marc eBrysbaert
Emmanuel eKeuleers
Boris eNew
spellingShingle Marc eBrysbaert
Emmanuel eKeuleers
Boris eNew
Assessing the usefulness of google books’ word frequencies for psycholinguistic research on word processing
Frontiers in Psychology
word recognition
Google Books ngrams
lexical decision
subtitle word frequencies
subtlex
word frequency
author_facet Marc eBrysbaert
Emmanuel eKeuleers
Boris eNew
author_sort Marc eBrysbaert
title Assessing the usefulness of google books’ word frequencies for psycholinguistic research on word processing
title_short Assessing the usefulness of google books’ word frequencies for psycholinguistic research on word processing
title_full Assessing the usefulness of google books’ word frequencies for psycholinguistic research on word processing
title_fullStr Assessing the usefulness of google books’ word frequencies for psycholinguistic research on word processing
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the usefulness of google books’ word frequencies for psycholinguistic research on word processing
title_sort assessing the usefulness of google books’ word frequencies for psycholinguistic research on word processing
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2011-03-01
description In this Perspective Article we assess the usefulness of Google’s new word frequencies for word recognition research (lexical decision and word naming). We find that, despite the massive corpus on which the Google estimates are based (131 billion words from books published in the United States alone), the Google American English frequencies explain 11% less of the variance in the lexical decision times from the English Lexicon Project (Balota et al., 2007) than the SUBTLEX-US word frequencies, based on a corpus of 51 million words from film and television subtitles. Further analyses indicate that word frequencies derived from recent books (published after 2000) are better predictors of word processing times than frequencies based on the full corpus, and that word frequencies based on fiction books predict word processing times better than word frequencies based on the full corpus. The most predictive word frequencies from Google still do not explain more of the variance in word recognition times of undergraduate students and old adults than the subtitle-based word frequencies.
topic word recognition
Google Books ngrams
lexical decision
subtitle word frequencies
subtlex
word frequency
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00027/full
work_keys_str_mv AT marcebrysbaert assessingtheusefulnessofgooglebookswordfrequenciesforpsycholinguisticresearchonwordprocessing
AT emmanuelekeuleers assessingtheusefulnessofgooglebookswordfrequenciesforpsycholinguisticresearchonwordprocessing
AT borisenew assessingtheusefulnessofgooglebookswordfrequenciesforpsycholinguisticresearchonwordprocessing
_version_ 1725476760284299264