Effective communication and sharing information at clinical handovers

Aim: The aim of this study was to present an overview of current knowledge of approaches to improving patient safety and to ensuring continuity of care at clinical information handovers (handoffs). Design: Descriptive summarizing study. Methods: PubMed, Science Direct, Embase and Google Scholar data...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Radka Pokojová, Sylva Bártlová
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Ostrava 2018-12-01
Series:Central European Journal of Nursing and Midwifery
Subjects:
Online Access: https://periodika.osu.cz/ojs/index.php/cejnm/article/view/156/80
id doaj-f379c8a8001e4fe48c60e137421887dd
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f379c8a8001e4fe48c60e137421887dd2020-11-25T01:37:18ZengUniversity of OstravaCentral European Journal of Nursing and Midwifery2336-35172336-35172018-12-019494795510.15452/CEJNM.2018.09.0028CEJNM.2018.09.0028Effective communication and sharing information at clinical handoversRadka Pokojová0Sylva Bártlová1 Institute of Nursing, Midwifery and Emergency Care, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Czech Republic Institute of Nursing, Midwifery and Emergency Care, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Czech Republic Aim: The aim of this study was to present an overview of current knowledge of approaches to improving patient safety and to ensuring continuity of care at clinical information handovers (handoffs). Design: Descriptive summarizing study. Methods: PubMed, Science Direct, Embase and Google Scholar databases were studied, focusing on papers published in English over the past five years. The overview included papers dealing with the effectiveness of patient information transfer between members of staff, teams, and healthcare providers. After classification of materials, 28 articles were finally analyzed. Results: The tools for information handovers were mostly (i.e., in 18 instances) based on the mnemonic SBAR list. To a lesser extent, IPASS technology, the structure of body systems, and a checklist for trauma patients were used. The quality of transferred information was most frequently assessed at ICUs. Conclusion: The implementation of structured approaches for both oral and written information on patients is problematic, but the authors agree that it is necessary to take into account the particular conditions and context of communication. https://periodika.osu.cz/ojs/index.php/cejnm/article/view/156/80 care continuityinformation handover/handoffpatient safetystandardization
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Radka Pokojová
Sylva Bártlová
spellingShingle Radka Pokojová
Sylva Bártlová
Effective communication and sharing information at clinical handovers
Central European Journal of Nursing and Midwifery
care continuity
information handover/handoff
patient safety
standardization
author_facet Radka Pokojová
Sylva Bártlová
author_sort Radka Pokojová
title Effective communication and sharing information at clinical handovers
title_short Effective communication and sharing information at clinical handovers
title_full Effective communication and sharing information at clinical handovers
title_fullStr Effective communication and sharing information at clinical handovers
title_full_unstemmed Effective communication and sharing information at clinical handovers
title_sort effective communication and sharing information at clinical handovers
publisher University of Ostrava
series Central European Journal of Nursing and Midwifery
issn 2336-3517
2336-3517
publishDate 2018-12-01
description Aim: The aim of this study was to present an overview of current knowledge of approaches to improving patient safety and to ensuring continuity of care at clinical information handovers (handoffs). Design: Descriptive summarizing study. Methods: PubMed, Science Direct, Embase and Google Scholar databases were studied, focusing on papers published in English over the past five years. The overview included papers dealing with the effectiveness of patient information transfer between members of staff, teams, and healthcare providers. After classification of materials, 28 articles were finally analyzed. Results: The tools for information handovers were mostly (i.e., in 18 instances) based on the mnemonic SBAR list. To a lesser extent, IPASS technology, the structure of body systems, and a checklist for trauma patients were used. The quality of transferred information was most frequently assessed at ICUs. Conclusion: The implementation of structured approaches for both oral and written information on patients is problematic, but the authors agree that it is necessary to take into account the particular conditions and context of communication.
topic care continuity
information handover/handoff
patient safety
standardization
url https://periodika.osu.cz/ojs/index.php/cejnm/article/view/156/80
work_keys_str_mv AT radkapokojova effectivecommunicationandsharinginformationatclinicalhandovers
AT sylvabartlova effectivecommunicationandsharinginformationatclinicalhandovers
_version_ 1725058441544728576