Mixing carrots and sticks to conserve forests in the Brazilian Amazon: a spatial probabilistic modeling approach.

Annual forest loss in the Brazilian Amazon had in 2012 declined to less than 5,000 sqkm, from over 27,000 in 2004. Mounting empirical evidence suggests that changes in Brazilian law enforcement strategy and the related governance system may account for a large share of the overall success in curbing...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jan Börner, Eduardo Marinho, Sven Wunder
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2015-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4317180?pdf=render
id doaj-f38ea38706c3437a9294c4e65842854b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f38ea38706c3437a9294c4e65842854b2020-11-24T21:52:03ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032015-01-01102e011684610.1371/journal.pone.0116846Mixing carrots and sticks to conserve forests in the Brazilian Amazon: a spatial probabilistic modeling approach.Jan BörnerEduardo MarinhoSven WunderAnnual forest loss in the Brazilian Amazon had in 2012 declined to less than 5,000 sqkm, from over 27,000 in 2004. Mounting empirical evidence suggests that changes in Brazilian law enforcement strategy and the related governance system may account for a large share of the overall success in curbing deforestation rates. At the same time, Brazil is experimenting with alternative approaches to compensate farmers for conservation actions through economic incentives, such as payments for environmental services, at various administrative levels. We develop a spatially explicit simulation model for deforestation decisions in response to policy incentives and disincentives. The model builds on elements of optimal enforcement theory and introduces the notion of imperfect payment contract enforcement in the context of avoided deforestation. We implement the simulations using official deforestation statistics and data collected from field-based forest law enforcement operations in the Amazon region. We show that a large-scale integration of payments with the existing regulatory enforcement strategy involves a tradeoff between the cost-effectiveness of forest conservation and landholder incomes. Introducing payments as a complementary policy measure increases policy implementation cost, reduces income losses for those hit hardest by law enforcement, and can provide additional income to some land users. The magnitude of the tradeoff varies in space, depending on deforestation patterns, conservation opportunity and enforcement costs. Enforcement effectiveness becomes a key determinant of efficiency in the overall policy mix.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4317180?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jan Börner
Eduardo Marinho
Sven Wunder
spellingShingle Jan Börner
Eduardo Marinho
Sven Wunder
Mixing carrots and sticks to conserve forests in the Brazilian Amazon: a spatial probabilistic modeling approach.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Jan Börner
Eduardo Marinho
Sven Wunder
author_sort Jan Börner
title Mixing carrots and sticks to conserve forests in the Brazilian Amazon: a spatial probabilistic modeling approach.
title_short Mixing carrots and sticks to conserve forests in the Brazilian Amazon: a spatial probabilistic modeling approach.
title_full Mixing carrots and sticks to conserve forests in the Brazilian Amazon: a spatial probabilistic modeling approach.
title_fullStr Mixing carrots and sticks to conserve forests in the Brazilian Amazon: a spatial probabilistic modeling approach.
title_full_unstemmed Mixing carrots and sticks to conserve forests in the Brazilian Amazon: a spatial probabilistic modeling approach.
title_sort mixing carrots and sticks to conserve forests in the brazilian amazon: a spatial probabilistic modeling approach.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2015-01-01
description Annual forest loss in the Brazilian Amazon had in 2012 declined to less than 5,000 sqkm, from over 27,000 in 2004. Mounting empirical evidence suggests that changes in Brazilian law enforcement strategy and the related governance system may account for a large share of the overall success in curbing deforestation rates. At the same time, Brazil is experimenting with alternative approaches to compensate farmers for conservation actions through economic incentives, such as payments for environmental services, at various administrative levels. We develop a spatially explicit simulation model for deforestation decisions in response to policy incentives and disincentives. The model builds on elements of optimal enforcement theory and introduces the notion of imperfect payment contract enforcement in the context of avoided deforestation. We implement the simulations using official deforestation statistics and data collected from field-based forest law enforcement operations in the Amazon region. We show that a large-scale integration of payments with the existing regulatory enforcement strategy involves a tradeoff between the cost-effectiveness of forest conservation and landholder incomes. Introducing payments as a complementary policy measure increases policy implementation cost, reduces income losses for those hit hardest by law enforcement, and can provide additional income to some land users. The magnitude of the tradeoff varies in space, depending on deforestation patterns, conservation opportunity and enforcement costs. Enforcement effectiveness becomes a key determinant of efficiency in the overall policy mix.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4317180?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT janborner mixingcarrotsandstickstoconserveforestsinthebrazilianamazonaspatialprobabilisticmodelingapproach
AT eduardomarinho mixingcarrotsandstickstoconserveforestsinthebrazilianamazonaspatialprobabilisticmodelingapproach
AT svenwunder mixingcarrotsandstickstoconserveforestsinthebrazilianamazonaspatialprobabilisticmodelingapproach
_version_ 1725877155337863168