Comparison of Remotely Sensed Evapotranspiration Models Over Two Typical Sites in an Arid Riparian Ecosystem of Northwestern China

• Main Authors: Tao Du, Guofu Yuan, Li Wang, Xiaomin Sun, Rui Sun
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: MDPI AG 2020-05-01
• Series: Remote Sensing
• Subjects: evapotranspiration; remote sensing; eddy covariance; arid riparian ecosystem; vegetation indices; <i>Tamarix ramosissima</i>
• Online Access: https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/12/9/1434

Accurate estimates of evapotranspiration (ET) are essential for the conservation of ecosystems and sustainable management of water resources in arid and semiarid regions. Over the last two decades, several empirical remotely sensed ET models (ERSETMs) had been developed and extensively used for regional-scale ET estimation in arid and semiarid ecosystems. These ERSETMs were constructed by combining datasets from different sites and relating measured daily ET to corresponding meteorological data and vegetation indices at the site scale. Then, regional-scale ET on a pixel basis can be estimated, using the established ERSETMs. The estimation accuracy of these ERSETMs at the site scale plays a fundamental and crucial role in regional-scale ET estimation. Recent studies have revealed that ET estimates from some of these models have significant uncertainties at different spatiotemporal scales. However, little information is available on the performance of these ERSETMs at the site scale. In this study, we compared eight ERSETMs, using ET measurements from 2013 to 2018 for two typical eddy covariance sites (<i>Tamarix</i> site and <i>Populus</i> site) in an arid riparian ecosystem of Northwestern China, intending to provide a guide for the selection of these models. Results showed that the Nagler-2013 model and the Yuan-2016 model outperformed the other models. There were substantial differences in the ET estimation of the eight ERSETMs at daily, monthly, and seasonal scales. The mean ET of the growing season from 2013 to 2018 ranged from 465.93 to 519.65 mm for the <i>Tamarix</i> site and from 386.22 to 437.05 mm for the <i>Populus</i> site, respectively. The differences in model structures and characterization of both meteorological conditions and vegetation factors were the primary sources of different model performance. Our findings provide useful information for choosing models and obtaining accurate ET estimation in arid regions.