High nonpublication rate from publication professionals hinders evidence-based publication practices
Background. The need for timely, ethical, and high-quality reporting of clinical trial results has seen a rise in demand for publication professionals. These publication experts, who are not ghostwriters, work with leading medical researchers and funders around the world to plan and prepare thousand...
Main Authors: | Luke C. Carey, Serina Stretton, Charlotte A. Kenreigh, Linda T. Wagner, Karen L. Woolley |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
PeerJ Inc.
2016-05-01
|
Series: | PeerJ |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://peerj.com/articles/2011.pdf |
Similar Items
-
THE IMPACT OF AN EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE WORKSHOP ON RESIDENTS ATTITUDES TOWARDS AND CONFIDENCE IN THE DAILY PRACTICE OF EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE
by: Karyn Baum, MD
Published: (2003-03-01) -
Being a Critical Professional: The Importance of Post-Publication Peer Review in Evidence Based Library and Information Practice
by: Lorie A. Kloda
Published: (2009-09-01) -
Peer partnerships in teaching: Evaluation of a voluntary model of professional development in tertiary education
by: Andrea Chester
Published: (2012-06-01) -
Peer partnerships in teaching: Evaluation of a voluntary model of professional development in tertiary education
by: Andrea Chester
Published: (2012-06-01) -
The effects of quality control system on professional skepticism and its implications to audit quality with peer review as a moderating variable (A case study on Public Accounting Firms in Semarang)
by: Hafidz Ridloi
Published: (2021-04-01)