Non-Refoulement in Strasbourg: Making Sense of the Assessment of Individual Circumstances
When evaluating whether the expulsion or return of an applicant gives rise to a real risk of treatment proscribed by Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights, and the principle of non-refoulement contained therein, the European Court of Human Rights must assess the general situation in t...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Scandinavian University Press (Universitetsforlaget)
2018-01-01
|
Series: | Oslo Law Review |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.idunn.no/oslo_law_review/2018/03/non-refoulement_in_strasbourg_making_sense_of_the_assessme |
id |
doaj-f3d4b840dc2b41a8b34d0334518ba93d |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-f3d4b840dc2b41a8b34d0334518ba93d2020-11-25T03:48:15ZengScandinavian University Press (Universitetsforlaget)Oslo Law Review2387-32992018-01-01514717410.18261/issn.2387-3299-2018-03-0218948693Non-Refoulement in Strasbourg: Making Sense of the Assessment of Individual CircumstancesErna Kristín BlöndalOddný Mjöll ArnardóttirWhen evaluating whether the expulsion or return of an applicant gives rise to a real risk of treatment proscribed by Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights, and the principle of non-refoulement contained therein, the European Court of Human Rights must assess the general situation in the relevant country as well as the applicant’s personal circumstances. It is therefore of the utmost importance to identify which individual factors are considered relevant to this assessment. At the same time, however, the case law has been considered unclear on this issue. This article presents the findings of a thematic analysis of the Court’s case law, which seeks to clarify the Court’s practice by identifying the key individual factors that either enhance or ameliorate risk of ill-treatment in different contexts.https://www.idunn.no/oslo_law_review/2018/03/non-refoulement_in_strasbourg_making_sense_of_the_assessmeNon-refoulementasylumArticle 3 ECHRindividual circumstancesresiliencevulnerability. |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Erna Kristín Blöndal Oddný Mjöll Arnardóttir |
spellingShingle |
Erna Kristín Blöndal Oddný Mjöll Arnardóttir Non-Refoulement in Strasbourg: Making Sense of the Assessment of Individual Circumstances Oslo Law Review Non-refoulement asylum Article 3 ECHR individual circumstances resilience vulnerability. |
author_facet |
Erna Kristín Blöndal Oddný Mjöll Arnardóttir |
author_sort |
Erna Kristín Blöndal |
title |
Non-Refoulement in Strasbourg: Making Sense of the Assessment of Individual Circumstances |
title_short |
Non-Refoulement in Strasbourg: Making Sense of the Assessment of Individual Circumstances |
title_full |
Non-Refoulement in Strasbourg: Making Sense of the Assessment of Individual Circumstances |
title_fullStr |
Non-Refoulement in Strasbourg: Making Sense of the Assessment of Individual Circumstances |
title_full_unstemmed |
Non-Refoulement in Strasbourg: Making Sense of the Assessment of Individual Circumstances |
title_sort |
non-refoulement in strasbourg: making sense of the assessment of individual circumstances |
publisher |
Scandinavian University Press (Universitetsforlaget) |
series |
Oslo Law Review |
issn |
2387-3299 |
publishDate |
2018-01-01 |
description |
When evaluating whether the expulsion or return of an applicant gives rise to a real risk of treatment proscribed by Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights, and the principle of non-refoulement contained therein, the European Court of Human Rights must assess the general situation in the relevant country as well as the applicant’s personal circumstances. It is therefore of the utmost importance to identify which individual factors are considered relevant to this assessment. At the same time, however, the case law has been considered unclear on this issue. This article presents the findings of a thematic analysis of the Court’s case law, which seeks to clarify the Court’s practice by identifying the key individual factors that either enhance or ameliorate risk of ill-treatment in different contexts. |
topic |
Non-refoulement asylum Article 3 ECHR individual circumstances resilience vulnerability. |
url |
https://www.idunn.no/oslo_law_review/2018/03/non-refoulement_in_strasbourg_making_sense_of_the_assessme |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT ernakristinblondal nonrefoulementinstrasbourgmakingsenseoftheassessmentofindividualcircumstances AT oddnymjollarnardottir nonrefoulementinstrasbourgmakingsenseoftheassessmentofindividualcircumstances |
_version_ |
1724499395491135488 |