Non-Refoulement in Strasbourg: Making Sense of the Assessment of Individual Circumstances

When evaluating whether the expulsion or return of an applicant gives rise to a real risk of treatment proscribed by Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights, and the principle of non-refoulement contained therein, the European Court of Human Rights must assess the general situation in t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Erna Kristín Blöndal, Oddný Mjöll Arnardóttir
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Scandinavian University Press (Universitetsforlaget) 2018-01-01
Series:Oslo Law Review
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.idunn.no/oslo_law_review/2018/03/non-refoulement_in_strasbourg_making_sense_of_the_assessme
id doaj-f3d4b840dc2b41a8b34d0334518ba93d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f3d4b840dc2b41a8b34d0334518ba93d2020-11-25T03:48:15ZengScandinavian University Press (Universitetsforlaget)Oslo Law Review2387-32992018-01-01514717410.18261/issn.2387-3299-2018-03-0218948693Non-Refoulement in Strasbourg: Making Sense of the Assessment of Individual CircumstancesErna Kristín BlöndalOddný Mjöll ArnardóttirWhen evaluating whether the expulsion or return of an applicant gives rise to a real risk of treatment proscribed by Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights, and the principle of non-refoulement contained therein, the European Court of Human Rights must assess the general situation in the relevant country as well as the applicant’s personal circumstances. It is therefore of the utmost importance to identify which individual factors are considered relevant to this assessment. At the same time, however, the case law has been considered unclear on this issue. This article presents the findings of a thematic analysis of the Court’s case law, which seeks to clarify the Court’s practice by identifying the key individual factors that either enhance or ameliorate risk of ill-treatment in different contexts.https://www.idunn.no/oslo_law_review/2018/03/non-refoulement_in_strasbourg_making_sense_of_the_assessmeNon-refoulementasylumArticle 3 ECHRindividual circumstancesresiliencevulnerability.
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Erna Kristín Blöndal
Oddný Mjöll Arnardóttir
spellingShingle Erna Kristín Blöndal
Oddný Mjöll Arnardóttir
Non-Refoulement in Strasbourg: Making Sense of the Assessment of Individual Circumstances
Oslo Law Review
Non-refoulement
asylum
Article 3 ECHR
individual circumstances
resilience
vulnerability.
author_facet Erna Kristín Blöndal
Oddný Mjöll Arnardóttir
author_sort Erna Kristín Blöndal
title Non-Refoulement in Strasbourg: Making Sense of the Assessment of Individual Circumstances
title_short Non-Refoulement in Strasbourg: Making Sense of the Assessment of Individual Circumstances
title_full Non-Refoulement in Strasbourg: Making Sense of the Assessment of Individual Circumstances
title_fullStr Non-Refoulement in Strasbourg: Making Sense of the Assessment of Individual Circumstances
title_full_unstemmed Non-Refoulement in Strasbourg: Making Sense of the Assessment of Individual Circumstances
title_sort non-refoulement in strasbourg: making sense of the assessment of individual circumstances
publisher Scandinavian University Press (Universitetsforlaget)
series Oslo Law Review
issn 2387-3299
publishDate 2018-01-01
description When evaluating whether the expulsion or return of an applicant gives rise to a real risk of treatment proscribed by Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights, and the principle of non-refoulement contained therein, the European Court of Human Rights must assess the general situation in the relevant country as well as the applicant’s personal circumstances. It is therefore of the utmost importance to identify which individual factors are considered relevant to this assessment. At the same time, however, the case law has been considered unclear on this issue. This article presents the findings of a thematic analysis of the Court’s case law, which seeks to clarify the Court’s practice by identifying the key individual factors that either enhance or ameliorate risk of ill-treatment in different contexts.
topic Non-refoulement
asylum
Article 3 ECHR
individual circumstances
resilience
vulnerability.
url https://www.idunn.no/oslo_law_review/2018/03/non-refoulement_in_strasbourg_making_sense_of_the_assessme
work_keys_str_mv AT ernakristinblondal nonrefoulementinstrasbourgmakingsenseoftheassessmentofindividualcircumstances
AT oddnymjollarnardottir nonrefoulementinstrasbourgmakingsenseoftheassessmentofindividualcircumstances
_version_ 1724499395491135488