Pour une frontière sémantique entre les pays d’immigration et les pays avec immigration

This text is in the field of international and intercultural communication. The usage of the term immigration countries that defines the countries of the New World as well as the countries of the Old Continent leads to confusion. We suggest that a semantic distinction should be made between the term...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Gina Stoiciu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Université du Québec à Montréal 2009-01-01
Series:Communiquer
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/communiquer/284
id doaj-f3e577376cfa49038f16bb70c3a1bf1b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f3e577376cfa49038f16bb70c3a1bf1b2020-11-24T21:07:52ZengUniversité du Québec à MontréalCommuniquer 2368-95872009-01-011435810.4000/communiquer.284Pour une frontière sémantique entre les pays d’immigration et les pays avec immigrationGina StoiciuThis text is in the field of international and intercultural communication. The usage of the term immigration countries that defines the countries of the New World as well as the countries of the Old Continent leads to confusion. We suggest that a semantic distinction should be made between the term immigration countries, which refer to the countries of North America, born from the continental migration, and countries with immigrant population, which refers to countries like France that have been receiving post colonial immigrants. In order to argue about the necessity of setting this semantic boundary between the two terms, we suggest a comparative socio-historical analysis to be made, which will involve a certain number of contextual factors of historical, political, social and symbolic order. The United States, Canada, Quebec and France are the subject of this comparative analysis. Three major arguments are given in support of the thesis: the first refers to the idea of the national community, the second one refers to the understanding of the integration of the immigrants in the accepting country, and the third one is linked to the recognition of the immigrants by the national consciousness.http://journals.openedition.org/communiquer/284immigration countriescountries with immigrant populationnational communityintegrationrecognition
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Gina Stoiciu
spellingShingle Gina Stoiciu
Pour une frontière sémantique entre les pays d’immigration et les pays avec immigration
Communiquer
immigration countries
countries with immigrant population
national community
integration
recognition
author_facet Gina Stoiciu
author_sort Gina Stoiciu
title Pour une frontière sémantique entre les pays d’immigration et les pays avec immigration
title_short Pour une frontière sémantique entre les pays d’immigration et les pays avec immigration
title_full Pour une frontière sémantique entre les pays d’immigration et les pays avec immigration
title_fullStr Pour une frontière sémantique entre les pays d’immigration et les pays avec immigration
title_full_unstemmed Pour une frontière sémantique entre les pays d’immigration et les pays avec immigration
title_sort pour une frontière sémantique entre les pays d’immigration et les pays avec immigration
publisher Université du Québec à Montréal
series Communiquer
issn 2368-9587
publishDate 2009-01-01
description This text is in the field of international and intercultural communication. The usage of the term immigration countries that defines the countries of the New World as well as the countries of the Old Continent leads to confusion. We suggest that a semantic distinction should be made between the term immigration countries, which refer to the countries of North America, born from the continental migration, and countries with immigrant population, which refers to countries like France that have been receiving post colonial immigrants. In order to argue about the necessity of setting this semantic boundary between the two terms, we suggest a comparative socio-historical analysis to be made, which will involve a certain number of contextual factors of historical, political, social and symbolic order. The United States, Canada, Quebec and France are the subject of this comparative analysis. Three major arguments are given in support of the thesis: the first refers to the idea of the national community, the second one refers to the understanding of the integration of the immigrants in the accepting country, and the third one is linked to the recognition of the immigrants by the national consciousness.
topic immigration countries
countries with immigrant population
national community
integration
recognition
url http://journals.openedition.org/communiquer/284
work_keys_str_mv AT ginastoiciu pourunefrontieresemantiqueentrelespaysdimmigrationetlespaysavecimmigration
_version_ 1716761723719909376