Assessment of the mechanical forces applied during eye rubbing

Abstract Background To determine the average amount of mechanical forces applied to the lids of keratoconus patients during eye rubbing. Methods Fifty-seven patients (41 male, 16 female, average age 34.8 years) with a clinically and topographically diagnosed keratoconus and a history of eye rubbing...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Farhad Hafezi, Nikki L. Hafezi, Bojan Pajic, Francesca Gilardoni, J. Bradley Randleman, Jose Alvaro P. Gomes, Léonard Kollros, Mark Hillen, Emilio A. Torres-Netto
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-07-01
Series:BMC Ophthalmology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12886-020-01551-5
id doaj-f3fab3a26e00496c8f9d68812a62c813
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f3fab3a26e00496c8f9d68812a62c8132020-11-25T03:38:38ZengBMCBMC Ophthalmology1471-24152020-07-012011510.1186/s12886-020-01551-5Assessment of the mechanical forces applied during eye rubbingFarhad Hafezi0Nikki L. Hafezi1Bojan Pajic2Francesca Gilardoni3J. Bradley Randleman4Jose Alvaro P. Gomes5Léonard Kollros6Mark Hillen7Emilio A. Torres-Netto8Laboratory for Ocular Cell Biology, Center for Applied Biotechnology and Molecular Medicine, University of ZurichELZA InstituteFaculty of Medicine, University of GenevaLaboratory for Ocular Cell Biology, Center for Applied Biotechnology and Molecular Medicine, University of ZurichThe Cleveland ClinicDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Paulista School of Medicine, Federal University of Sao PauloELZA InstituteELZA InstituteLaboratory for Ocular Cell Biology, Center for Applied Biotechnology and Molecular Medicine, University of ZurichAbstract Background To determine the average amount of mechanical forces applied to the lids of keratoconus patients during eye rubbing. Methods Fifty-seven patients (41 male, 16 female, average age 34.8 years) with a clinically and topographically diagnosed keratoconus and a history of eye rubbing were prospectively asked to perform their individual eye rubbing movement on a high-precision balance. The type of eye-rubbing movement and the force applied, represented in newtons (N), were recorded and analyzed. Results We detected three different types of eye rubbing. Rubbing with the fingertip was most frequent (51%), followed by rubbing with the knuckle (44%) and rubbing with the fingernail (6%). Each type of eye rubbing showed different average forces, with knuckle type eye rubbing applying significantly more force (9.6 ± 6.3 N) on the lids than fingertip (4.3 ± 3.1 N) and fingernail (2.6 ± 3.3 N) types (p < 0,001 and p = 0,016, respectively). Conclusions There were major variations in the force exerted on the lids, depending on the type of eye rubbing employed. This data will help determine the forces that need to be applied in future experimental eye rubbing models.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12886-020-01551-5Corneal biomechanicsKeratoconusEye rubbing
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Farhad Hafezi
Nikki L. Hafezi
Bojan Pajic
Francesca Gilardoni
J. Bradley Randleman
Jose Alvaro P. Gomes
Léonard Kollros
Mark Hillen
Emilio A. Torres-Netto
spellingShingle Farhad Hafezi
Nikki L. Hafezi
Bojan Pajic
Francesca Gilardoni
J. Bradley Randleman
Jose Alvaro P. Gomes
Léonard Kollros
Mark Hillen
Emilio A. Torres-Netto
Assessment of the mechanical forces applied during eye rubbing
BMC Ophthalmology
Corneal biomechanics
Keratoconus
Eye rubbing
author_facet Farhad Hafezi
Nikki L. Hafezi
Bojan Pajic
Francesca Gilardoni
J. Bradley Randleman
Jose Alvaro P. Gomes
Léonard Kollros
Mark Hillen
Emilio A. Torres-Netto
author_sort Farhad Hafezi
title Assessment of the mechanical forces applied during eye rubbing
title_short Assessment of the mechanical forces applied during eye rubbing
title_full Assessment of the mechanical forces applied during eye rubbing
title_fullStr Assessment of the mechanical forces applied during eye rubbing
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of the mechanical forces applied during eye rubbing
title_sort assessment of the mechanical forces applied during eye rubbing
publisher BMC
series BMC Ophthalmology
issn 1471-2415
publishDate 2020-07-01
description Abstract Background To determine the average amount of mechanical forces applied to the lids of keratoconus patients during eye rubbing. Methods Fifty-seven patients (41 male, 16 female, average age 34.8 years) with a clinically and topographically diagnosed keratoconus and a history of eye rubbing were prospectively asked to perform their individual eye rubbing movement on a high-precision balance. The type of eye-rubbing movement and the force applied, represented in newtons (N), were recorded and analyzed. Results We detected three different types of eye rubbing. Rubbing with the fingertip was most frequent (51%), followed by rubbing with the knuckle (44%) and rubbing with the fingernail (6%). Each type of eye rubbing showed different average forces, with knuckle type eye rubbing applying significantly more force (9.6 ± 6.3 N) on the lids than fingertip (4.3 ± 3.1 N) and fingernail (2.6 ± 3.3 N) types (p < 0,001 and p = 0,016, respectively). Conclusions There were major variations in the force exerted on the lids, depending on the type of eye rubbing employed. This data will help determine the forces that need to be applied in future experimental eye rubbing models.
topic Corneal biomechanics
Keratoconus
Eye rubbing
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12886-020-01551-5
work_keys_str_mv AT farhadhafezi assessmentofthemechanicalforcesappliedduringeyerubbing
AT nikkilhafezi assessmentofthemechanicalforcesappliedduringeyerubbing
AT bojanpajic assessmentofthemechanicalforcesappliedduringeyerubbing
AT francescagilardoni assessmentofthemechanicalforcesappliedduringeyerubbing
AT jbradleyrandleman assessmentofthemechanicalforcesappliedduringeyerubbing
AT josealvaropgomes assessmentofthemechanicalforcesappliedduringeyerubbing
AT leonardkollros assessmentofthemechanicalforcesappliedduringeyerubbing
AT markhillen assessmentofthemechanicalforcesappliedduringeyerubbing
AT emilioatorresnetto assessmentofthemechanicalforcesappliedduringeyerubbing
_version_ 1724541471481135104