Pheromone Autodetection: Evidence and Implications

Olfactory communication research with insects utilizing sex pheromones has focused on the effects of pheromones on signal receivers. Early pheromone detection studies using the silkworm moth, Bombyx mori L., and Saturniids led to the assumption that emitters, especially females, are unable to detect...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Robert Holdcraft, Cesar Rodriguez-Saona, Lukasz L. Stelinski
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2016-04-01
Series:Insects
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2075-4450/7/2/17
id doaj-f407c4404a544a7fa4e704f92f4550a4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f407c4404a544a7fa4e704f92f4550a42020-11-24T20:44:47ZengMDPI AGInsects2075-44502016-04-01721710.3390/insects7020017insects7020017Pheromone Autodetection: Evidence and ImplicationsRobert Holdcraft0Cesar Rodriguez-Saona1Lukasz L. Stelinski2Marucci Center for Blueberry and Cranberry Research and Extension, Rutgers University, 125A Lake Oswego Road, Chatsworth, NJ 08019, USAMarucci Center for Blueberry and Cranberry Research and Extension, Rutgers University, 125A Lake Oswego Road, Chatsworth, NJ 08019, USACitrus Research and Education Center, University of Florida, 700 Experiment Station Road, Lake Alfred, FL 33850, USAOlfactory communication research with insects utilizing sex pheromones has focused on the effects of pheromones on signal receivers. Early pheromone detection studies using the silkworm moth, Bombyx mori L., and Saturniids led to the assumption that emitters, especially females, are unable to detect their own pheromone. Pheromone anosmia, i.e., the inability of females to detect their conspecific sex pheromone, was often assumed, and initially little attention was paid to female behaviors that may result from autodetection, i.e., the ability of females to detect their sex pheromone. Detection of conspecific pheromone plumes from nearby females may provide information to improve chances of mating success and progeny survival. Since the first documented example in 1972, numerous occurrences of autodetection have been observed and verified in field and laboratory studies. We summarize here a significant portion of research relating to autodetection. Electrophysiological and behavioral investigations, as well as expression patterns of proteins involved in pheromone autodetection are included. We discuss problems inherent in defining a boundary between sex and aggregation pheromones considering the occurrence of autodetection, and summarize hypothesized selection pressures favoring autodetection. Importance of including autodetection studies in future work is emphasized by complications arising from a lack of knowledge combined with expanding the use of pheromones in agriculture.http://www.mdpi.com/2075-4450/7/2/17pheromone autodetectionanosmiaelectroantennogramsingle-sensillum recordingpheromone-binding-proteinintra-sexual communicationplume competitionmating disruption
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Robert Holdcraft
Cesar Rodriguez-Saona
Lukasz L. Stelinski
spellingShingle Robert Holdcraft
Cesar Rodriguez-Saona
Lukasz L. Stelinski
Pheromone Autodetection: Evidence and Implications
Insects
pheromone autodetection
anosmia
electroantennogram
single-sensillum recording
pheromone-binding-protein
intra-sexual communication
plume competition
mating disruption
author_facet Robert Holdcraft
Cesar Rodriguez-Saona
Lukasz L. Stelinski
author_sort Robert Holdcraft
title Pheromone Autodetection: Evidence and Implications
title_short Pheromone Autodetection: Evidence and Implications
title_full Pheromone Autodetection: Evidence and Implications
title_fullStr Pheromone Autodetection: Evidence and Implications
title_full_unstemmed Pheromone Autodetection: Evidence and Implications
title_sort pheromone autodetection: evidence and implications
publisher MDPI AG
series Insects
issn 2075-4450
publishDate 2016-04-01
description Olfactory communication research with insects utilizing sex pheromones has focused on the effects of pheromones on signal receivers. Early pheromone detection studies using the silkworm moth, Bombyx mori L., and Saturniids led to the assumption that emitters, especially females, are unable to detect their own pheromone. Pheromone anosmia, i.e., the inability of females to detect their conspecific sex pheromone, was often assumed, and initially little attention was paid to female behaviors that may result from autodetection, i.e., the ability of females to detect their sex pheromone. Detection of conspecific pheromone plumes from nearby females may provide information to improve chances of mating success and progeny survival. Since the first documented example in 1972, numerous occurrences of autodetection have been observed and verified in field and laboratory studies. We summarize here a significant portion of research relating to autodetection. Electrophysiological and behavioral investigations, as well as expression patterns of proteins involved in pheromone autodetection are included. We discuss problems inherent in defining a boundary between sex and aggregation pheromones considering the occurrence of autodetection, and summarize hypothesized selection pressures favoring autodetection. Importance of including autodetection studies in future work is emphasized by complications arising from a lack of knowledge combined with expanding the use of pheromones in agriculture.
topic pheromone autodetection
anosmia
electroantennogram
single-sensillum recording
pheromone-binding-protein
intra-sexual communication
plume competition
mating disruption
url http://www.mdpi.com/2075-4450/7/2/17
work_keys_str_mv AT robertholdcraft pheromoneautodetectionevidenceandimplications
AT cesarrodriguezsaona pheromoneautodetectionevidenceandimplications
AT lukaszlstelinski pheromoneautodetectionevidenceandimplications
_version_ 1716816643497132032