The impact of stimulus valence and emotion regulation on sustained brain activation: task-rest switching in emotion.

Task-rest interactions, defined as the modulation of brain activation during fixation periods depending on the preceding stimulation and experimental manipulation, have been described repeatedly for different cognitively demanding tasks in various regions across the brain. However, task-rest interac...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jan-Peter Lamke, Judith K Daniels, Denise Dörfel, Michael Gaebler, Rasha Abdel Rahman, Falk Hummel, Susanne Erk, Henrik Walter
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/24682003/pdf/?tool=EBI
id doaj-f472e8c1d1d9426a9cbdf0d5b1a70a00
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f472e8c1d1d9426a9cbdf0d5b1a70a002021-06-19T05:00:26ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-0193e9309810.1371/journal.pone.0093098The impact of stimulus valence and emotion regulation on sustained brain activation: task-rest switching in emotion.Jan-Peter LamkeJudith K DanielsDenise DörfelMichael GaeblerRasha Abdel RahmanFalk HummelSusanne ErkHenrik WalterTask-rest interactions, defined as the modulation of brain activation during fixation periods depending on the preceding stimulation and experimental manipulation, have been described repeatedly for different cognitively demanding tasks in various regions across the brain. However, task-rest interactions in emotive paradigms have received considerably less attention. In this study, we therefore investigated task-rest interactions evoked by the induction and instructed regulation of negative emotion. Whole-brain, functional MRI data were acquired from 55 healthy participants. Two-level general linear model statistics were computed to test for differences between conditions, separately for stimulation and for fixation periods, as well as for interactions between stimulation and fixation (task-rest interactions). Results showed that the regulation of negative emotion led to reverse task-rest interactions (decreased activation during stimulation but increased activation during fixation) in the amygdala as well as in visual cortex regions and to concordant task-rest interactions (increased activation during both, stimulation and fixation) in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex as well as in a number of brain regions at the intersection of the default mode and the dorsal attention networks. Thus, this first whole-brain investigation of task-rest interactions following the induction and regulation of negative emotion identified a widespread specific modulation of brain activation in regions subserving emotion generation and regulation as well as regions implicated in attention and default mode.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/24682003/pdf/?tool=EBI
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jan-Peter Lamke
Judith K Daniels
Denise Dörfel
Michael Gaebler
Rasha Abdel Rahman
Falk Hummel
Susanne Erk
Henrik Walter
spellingShingle Jan-Peter Lamke
Judith K Daniels
Denise Dörfel
Michael Gaebler
Rasha Abdel Rahman
Falk Hummel
Susanne Erk
Henrik Walter
The impact of stimulus valence and emotion regulation on sustained brain activation: task-rest switching in emotion.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Jan-Peter Lamke
Judith K Daniels
Denise Dörfel
Michael Gaebler
Rasha Abdel Rahman
Falk Hummel
Susanne Erk
Henrik Walter
author_sort Jan-Peter Lamke
title The impact of stimulus valence and emotion regulation on sustained brain activation: task-rest switching in emotion.
title_short The impact of stimulus valence and emotion regulation on sustained brain activation: task-rest switching in emotion.
title_full The impact of stimulus valence and emotion regulation on sustained brain activation: task-rest switching in emotion.
title_fullStr The impact of stimulus valence and emotion regulation on sustained brain activation: task-rest switching in emotion.
title_full_unstemmed The impact of stimulus valence and emotion regulation on sustained brain activation: task-rest switching in emotion.
title_sort impact of stimulus valence and emotion regulation on sustained brain activation: task-rest switching in emotion.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2014-01-01
description Task-rest interactions, defined as the modulation of brain activation during fixation periods depending on the preceding stimulation and experimental manipulation, have been described repeatedly for different cognitively demanding tasks in various regions across the brain. However, task-rest interactions in emotive paradigms have received considerably less attention. In this study, we therefore investigated task-rest interactions evoked by the induction and instructed regulation of negative emotion. Whole-brain, functional MRI data were acquired from 55 healthy participants. Two-level general linear model statistics were computed to test for differences between conditions, separately for stimulation and for fixation periods, as well as for interactions between stimulation and fixation (task-rest interactions). Results showed that the regulation of negative emotion led to reverse task-rest interactions (decreased activation during stimulation but increased activation during fixation) in the amygdala as well as in visual cortex regions and to concordant task-rest interactions (increased activation during both, stimulation and fixation) in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex as well as in a number of brain regions at the intersection of the default mode and the dorsal attention networks. Thus, this first whole-brain investigation of task-rest interactions following the induction and regulation of negative emotion identified a widespread specific modulation of brain activation in regions subserving emotion generation and regulation as well as regions implicated in attention and default mode.
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/24682003/pdf/?tool=EBI
work_keys_str_mv AT janpeterlamke theimpactofstimulusvalenceandemotionregulationonsustainedbrainactivationtaskrestswitchinginemotion
AT judithkdaniels theimpactofstimulusvalenceandemotionregulationonsustainedbrainactivationtaskrestswitchinginemotion
AT denisedorfel theimpactofstimulusvalenceandemotionregulationonsustainedbrainactivationtaskrestswitchinginemotion
AT michaelgaebler theimpactofstimulusvalenceandemotionregulationonsustainedbrainactivationtaskrestswitchinginemotion
AT rashaabdelrahman theimpactofstimulusvalenceandemotionregulationonsustainedbrainactivationtaskrestswitchinginemotion
AT falkhummel theimpactofstimulusvalenceandemotionregulationonsustainedbrainactivationtaskrestswitchinginemotion
AT susanneerk theimpactofstimulusvalenceandemotionregulationonsustainedbrainactivationtaskrestswitchinginemotion
AT henrikwalter theimpactofstimulusvalenceandemotionregulationonsustainedbrainactivationtaskrestswitchinginemotion
AT janpeterlamke impactofstimulusvalenceandemotionregulationonsustainedbrainactivationtaskrestswitchinginemotion
AT judithkdaniels impactofstimulusvalenceandemotionregulationonsustainedbrainactivationtaskrestswitchinginemotion
AT denisedorfel impactofstimulusvalenceandemotionregulationonsustainedbrainactivationtaskrestswitchinginemotion
AT michaelgaebler impactofstimulusvalenceandemotionregulationonsustainedbrainactivationtaskrestswitchinginemotion
AT rashaabdelrahman impactofstimulusvalenceandemotionregulationonsustainedbrainactivationtaskrestswitchinginemotion
AT falkhummel impactofstimulusvalenceandemotionregulationonsustainedbrainactivationtaskrestswitchinginemotion
AT susanneerk impactofstimulusvalenceandemotionregulationonsustainedbrainactivationtaskrestswitchinginemotion
AT henrikwalter impactofstimulusvalenceandemotionregulationonsustainedbrainactivationtaskrestswitchinginemotion
_version_ 1721371686712901632