Definition and prevalence of familial short stature
Abstract Objective To verify the prevalence of novel definitions of familial short stature on a cross-sectional cohort of children referred for short stature when their height and that of both parents were measured. Methods We consecutively enrolled 65 individuals referred for short stature when bot...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2021-03-01
|
Series: | Italian Journal of Pediatrics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13052-021-01018-3 |
id |
doaj-f48093a326774e088ba80dc9e3dc75cd |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-f48093a326774e088ba80dc9e3dc75cd2021-03-11T12:53:26ZengBMCItalian Journal of Pediatrics1824-72882021-03-014711510.1186/s13052-021-01018-3Definition and prevalence of familial short statureVeronica Grigoletto0Alessandro Agostino Occhipinti1Maria Chiara Pellegrin2Fabio Sirchia3Egidio Barbi4Gianluca Tornese5University of TriesteUniversity of TriesteInstitute for Maternal and Child Health - IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo” – TriesteInstitute for Maternal and Child Health - IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo” – TriesteUniversity of TriesteInstitute for Maternal and Child Health - IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo” – TriesteAbstract Objective To verify the prevalence of novel definitions of familial short stature on a cross-sectional cohort of children referred for short stature when their height and that of both parents were measured. Methods We consecutively enrolled 65 individuals referred for short stature when both parents were present. We defined “target height-related short stature” (TH-SS) when child’s height is ≤ − 2 SDS and included in the range of target height; suspected “autosomal dominant short stature” (AD-SS) when child height and at least one parent height are ≤ − 2 SDS; “constitutional familial short stature” (C-FSS) when a child with TH-SS does not have any parents with height ≤ − 2 SDS. Results Of 65 children referred for SS, 48 individuals had a height ≤ − 2 SDS. Based on the parents’ measured heights, 24 children had TH-SS, 16 subjects AD-SS, and 12 individuals C-FSS. If we had considered only the parents’ reported height, 3 of 24 children with TH-SS, 9 of 16 with AD-SS, and 10 of 12 with C-FSS would have been lost. Conclusion We suggest novel definitions to adequately detect and approach the cases of FSS since C-FSS (25%) might not need any specific investigation, while on the contrary, AD-SS (33%) should undergo genetic evaluation. Moreover, this study underlines that adequate measurement and consideration of children’s and parents’ heights (individually and together) are crucial in the clinical evaluation of every child with short stature.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13052-021-01018-3Familial short statureTarget heightGeneticsMeasuredReported |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Veronica Grigoletto Alessandro Agostino Occhipinti Maria Chiara Pellegrin Fabio Sirchia Egidio Barbi Gianluca Tornese |
spellingShingle |
Veronica Grigoletto Alessandro Agostino Occhipinti Maria Chiara Pellegrin Fabio Sirchia Egidio Barbi Gianluca Tornese Definition and prevalence of familial short stature Italian Journal of Pediatrics Familial short stature Target height Genetics Measured Reported |
author_facet |
Veronica Grigoletto Alessandro Agostino Occhipinti Maria Chiara Pellegrin Fabio Sirchia Egidio Barbi Gianluca Tornese |
author_sort |
Veronica Grigoletto |
title |
Definition and prevalence of familial short stature |
title_short |
Definition and prevalence of familial short stature |
title_full |
Definition and prevalence of familial short stature |
title_fullStr |
Definition and prevalence of familial short stature |
title_full_unstemmed |
Definition and prevalence of familial short stature |
title_sort |
definition and prevalence of familial short stature |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
Italian Journal of Pediatrics |
issn |
1824-7288 |
publishDate |
2021-03-01 |
description |
Abstract Objective To verify the prevalence of novel definitions of familial short stature on a cross-sectional cohort of children referred for short stature when their height and that of both parents were measured. Methods We consecutively enrolled 65 individuals referred for short stature when both parents were present. We defined “target height-related short stature” (TH-SS) when child’s height is ≤ − 2 SDS and included in the range of target height; suspected “autosomal dominant short stature” (AD-SS) when child height and at least one parent height are ≤ − 2 SDS; “constitutional familial short stature” (C-FSS) when a child with TH-SS does not have any parents with height ≤ − 2 SDS. Results Of 65 children referred for SS, 48 individuals had a height ≤ − 2 SDS. Based on the parents’ measured heights, 24 children had TH-SS, 16 subjects AD-SS, and 12 individuals C-FSS. If we had considered only the parents’ reported height, 3 of 24 children with TH-SS, 9 of 16 with AD-SS, and 10 of 12 with C-FSS would have been lost. Conclusion We suggest novel definitions to adequately detect and approach the cases of FSS since C-FSS (25%) might not need any specific investigation, while on the contrary, AD-SS (33%) should undergo genetic evaluation. Moreover, this study underlines that adequate measurement and consideration of children’s and parents’ heights (individually and together) are crucial in the clinical evaluation of every child with short stature. |
topic |
Familial short stature Target height Genetics Measured Reported |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13052-021-01018-3 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT veronicagrigoletto definitionandprevalenceoffamilialshortstature AT alessandroagostinoocchipinti definitionandprevalenceoffamilialshortstature AT mariachiarapellegrin definitionandprevalenceoffamilialshortstature AT fabiosirchia definitionandprevalenceoffamilialshortstature AT egidiobarbi definitionandprevalenceoffamilialshortstature AT gianlucatornese definitionandprevalenceoffamilialshortstature |
_version_ |
1724223986134417408 |