Definition and prevalence of familial short stature

Abstract Objective To verify the prevalence of novel definitions of familial short stature on a cross-sectional cohort of children referred for short stature when their height and that of both parents were measured. Methods We consecutively enrolled 65 individuals referred for short stature when bot...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Veronica Grigoletto, Alessandro Agostino Occhipinti, Maria Chiara Pellegrin, Fabio Sirchia, Egidio Barbi, Gianluca Tornese
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-03-01
Series:Italian Journal of Pediatrics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13052-021-01018-3
id doaj-f48093a326774e088ba80dc9e3dc75cd
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f48093a326774e088ba80dc9e3dc75cd2021-03-11T12:53:26ZengBMCItalian Journal of Pediatrics1824-72882021-03-014711510.1186/s13052-021-01018-3Definition and prevalence of familial short statureVeronica Grigoletto0Alessandro Agostino Occhipinti1Maria Chiara Pellegrin2Fabio Sirchia3Egidio Barbi4Gianluca Tornese5University of TriesteUniversity of TriesteInstitute for Maternal and Child Health - IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo” – TriesteInstitute for Maternal and Child Health - IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo” – TriesteUniversity of TriesteInstitute for Maternal and Child Health - IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo” – TriesteAbstract Objective To verify the prevalence of novel definitions of familial short stature on a cross-sectional cohort of children referred for short stature when their height and that of both parents were measured. Methods We consecutively enrolled 65 individuals referred for short stature when both parents were present. We defined “target height-related short stature” (TH-SS) when child’s height is ≤ − 2 SDS and included in the range of target height; suspected “autosomal dominant short stature” (AD-SS) when child height and at least one parent height are ≤ − 2 SDS; “constitutional familial short stature” (C-FSS) when a child with TH-SS does not have any parents with height ≤ − 2 SDS. Results Of 65 children referred for SS, 48 individuals had a height ≤ − 2 SDS. Based on the parents’ measured heights, 24 children had TH-SS, 16 subjects AD-SS, and 12 individuals C-FSS. If we had considered only the parents’ reported height, 3 of 24 children with TH-SS, 9 of 16 with AD-SS, and 10 of 12 with C-FSS would have been lost. Conclusion We suggest novel definitions to adequately detect and approach the cases of FSS since C-FSS (25%) might not need any specific investigation, while on the contrary, AD-SS (33%) should undergo genetic evaluation. Moreover, this study underlines that adequate measurement and consideration of children’s and parents’ heights (individually and together) are crucial in the clinical evaluation of every child with short stature.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13052-021-01018-3Familial short statureTarget heightGeneticsMeasuredReported
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Veronica Grigoletto
Alessandro Agostino Occhipinti
Maria Chiara Pellegrin
Fabio Sirchia
Egidio Barbi
Gianluca Tornese
spellingShingle Veronica Grigoletto
Alessandro Agostino Occhipinti
Maria Chiara Pellegrin
Fabio Sirchia
Egidio Barbi
Gianluca Tornese
Definition and prevalence of familial short stature
Italian Journal of Pediatrics
Familial short stature
Target height
Genetics
Measured
Reported
author_facet Veronica Grigoletto
Alessandro Agostino Occhipinti
Maria Chiara Pellegrin
Fabio Sirchia
Egidio Barbi
Gianluca Tornese
author_sort Veronica Grigoletto
title Definition and prevalence of familial short stature
title_short Definition and prevalence of familial short stature
title_full Definition and prevalence of familial short stature
title_fullStr Definition and prevalence of familial short stature
title_full_unstemmed Definition and prevalence of familial short stature
title_sort definition and prevalence of familial short stature
publisher BMC
series Italian Journal of Pediatrics
issn 1824-7288
publishDate 2021-03-01
description Abstract Objective To verify the prevalence of novel definitions of familial short stature on a cross-sectional cohort of children referred for short stature when their height and that of both parents were measured. Methods We consecutively enrolled 65 individuals referred for short stature when both parents were present. We defined “target height-related short stature” (TH-SS) when child’s height is ≤ − 2 SDS and included in the range of target height; suspected “autosomal dominant short stature” (AD-SS) when child height and at least one parent height are ≤ − 2 SDS; “constitutional familial short stature” (C-FSS) when a child with TH-SS does not have any parents with height ≤ − 2 SDS. Results Of 65 children referred for SS, 48 individuals had a height ≤ − 2 SDS. Based on the parents’ measured heights, 24 children had TH-SS, 16 subjects AD-SS, and 12 individuals C-FSS. If we had considered only the parents’ reported height, 3 of 24 children with TH-SS, 9 of 16 with AD-SS, and 10 of 12 with C-FSS would have been lost. Conclusion We suggest novel definitions to adequately detect and approach the cases of FSS since C-FSS (25%) might not need any specific investigation, while on the contrary, AD-SS (33%) should undergo genetic evaluation. Moreover, this study underlines that adequate measurement and consideration of children’s and parents’ heights (individually and together) are crucial in the clinical evaluation of every child with short stature.
topic Familial short stature
Target height
Genetics
Measured
Reported
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13052-021-01018-3
work_keys_str_mv AT veronicagrigoletto definitionandprevalenceoffamilialshortstature
AT alessandroagostinoocchipinti definitionandprevalenceoffamilialshortstature
AT mariachiarapellegrin definitionandprevalenceoffamilialshortstature
AT fabiosirchia definitionandprevalenceoffamilialshortstature
AT egidiobarbi definitionandprevalenceoffamilialshortstature
AT gianlucatornese definitionandprevalenceoffamilialshortstature
_version_ 1724223986134417408