Measuring the health impact of human rights violations related to Australian asylum policies and practices: a mixed methods study

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Human rights violations have adverse consequences for health. However, to date, there remains little empirical evidence documenting this association, beyond the obvious physical and psychological effects of torture. The primary aim o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mulholland Kim, Allotey Pascale, Johnston Vanessa, Markovic Milica
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2009-02-01
Series:BMC International Health and Human Rights
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-698X/9/1
id doaj-f4bd2f1197ec489eaabf07ad9375f9a1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f4bd2f1197ec489eaabf07ad9375f9a12021-04-02T09:22:15ZengBMCBMC International Health and Human Rights1472-698X2009-02-0191110.1186/1472-698X-9-1Measuring the health impact of human rights violations related to Australian asylum policies and practices: a mixed methods studyMulholland KimAllotey PascaleJohnston VanessaMarkovic Milica<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Human rights violations have adverse consequences for health. However, to date, there remains little empirical evidence documenting this association, beyond the obvious physical and psychological effects of torture. The primary aim of this study was to investigate whether Australian asylum policies and practices, which arguably violate human rights, are associated with adverse health outcomes.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We designed a mixed methods study to address the study aim. A cross-sectional survey was conducted with 71 Iraqi Temporary Protection Visa (TPV) refugees and 60 Iraqi Permanent Humanitarian Visa (PHV) refugees, residing in Melbourne, Australia. Prior to a recent policy amendment, TPV refugees were only given temporary residency status and had restricted access to a range of government funded benefits and services that permanent refugees are automatically entitled to. The quantitative results were triangulated with semi-structured interviews with TPV refugees and service providers. The main outcome measures were self-reported physical and psychological health. Standardised self-report instruments, validated in an Arabic population, were used to measure health and wellbeing outcomes.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Forty-six percent of TPV refugees compared with 25% of PHV refugees reported symptoms consistent with a diagnosis of clinical depression (p = 0.003). After controlling for the effects of age, gender and marital status, TPV status made a statistically significant contribution to psychological distress (B = 0.5, 95% CI 0.3 to 0.71, p ≤ 0.001) amongst Iraqi refugees. Qualitative data revealed that TPV refugees generally felt socially isolated and lacking in control over their life circumstances, because of their experiences in detention and on a temporary visa. This sense of powerlessness and, for some, an implicit awareness they were being denied basic human rights, culminated in a strong sense of injustice.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Government asylum policies and practices violating human rights norms are associated with demonstrable psychological health impacts. This link between policy, rights violations and health outcomes offers a framework for addressing the impact of socio-political structures on health.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-698X/9/1
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mulholland Kim
Allotey Pascale
Johnston Vanessa
Markovic Milica
spellingShingle Mulholland Kim
Allotey Pascale
Johnston Vanessa
Markovic Milica
Measuring the health impact of human rights violations related to Australian asylum policies and practices: a mixed methods study
BMC International Health and Human Rights
author_facet Mulholland Kim
Allotey Pascale
Johnston Vanessa
Markovic Milica
author_sort Mulholland Kim
title Measuring the health impact of human rights violations related to Australian asylum policies and practices: a mixed methods study
title_short Measuring the health impact of human rights violations related to Australian asylum policies and practices: a mixed methods study
title_full Measuring the health impact of human rights violations related to Australian asylum policies and practices: a mixed methods study
title_fullStr Measuring the health impact of human rights violations related to Australian asylum policies and practices: a mixed methods study
title_full_unstemmed Measuring the health impact of human rights violations related to Australian asylum policies and practices: a mixed methods study
title_sort measuring the health impact of human rights violations related to australian asylum policies and practices: a mixed methods study
publisher BMC
series BMC International Health and Human Rights
issn 1472-698X
publishDate 2009-02-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Human rights violations have adverse consequences for health. However, to date, there remains little empirical evidence documenting this association, beyond the obvious physical and psychological effects of torture. The primary aim of this study was to investigate whether Australian asylum policies and practices, which arguably violate human rights, are associated with adverse health outcomes.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We designed a mixed methods study to address the study aim. A cross-sectional survey was conducted with 71 Iraqi Temporary Protection Visa (TPV) refugees and 60 Iraqi Permanent Humanitarian Visa (PHV) refugees, residing in Melbourne, Australia. Prior to a recent policy amendment, TPV refugees were only given temporary residency status and had restricted access to a range of government funded benefits and services that permanent refugees are automatically entitled to. The quantitative results were triangulated with semi-structured interviews with TPV refugees and service providers. The main outcome measures were self-reported physical and psychological health. Standardised self-report instruments, validated in an Arabic population, were used to measure health and wellbeing outcomes.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Forty-six percent of TPV refugees compared with 25% of PHV refugees reported symptoms consistent with a diagnosis of clinical depression (p = 0.003). After controlling for the effects of age, gender and marital status, TPV status made a statistically significant contribution to psychological distress (B = 0.5, 95% CI 0.3 to 0.71, p ≤ 0.001) amongst Iraqi refugees. Qualitative data revealed that TPV refugees generally felt socially isolated and lacking in control over their life circumstances, because of their experiences in detention and on a temporary visa. This sense of powerlessness and, for some, an implicit awareness they were being denied basic human rights, culminated in a strong sense of injustice.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Government asylum policies and practices violating human rights norms are associated with demonstrable psychological health impacts. This link between policy, rights violations and health outcomes offers a framework for addressing the impact of socio-political structures on health.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-698X/9/1
work_keys_str_mv AT mulhollandkim measuringthehealthimpactofhumanrightsviolationsrelatedtoaustralianasylumpoliciesandpracticesamixedmethodsstudy
AT alloteypascale measuringthehealthimpactofhumanrightsviolationsrelatedtoaustralianasylumpoliciesandpracticesamixedmethodsstudy
AT johnstonvanessa measuringthehealthimpactofhumanrightsviolationsrelatedtoaustralianasylumpoliciesandpracticesamixedmethodsstudy
AT markovicmilica measuringthehealthimpactofhumanrightsviolationsrelatedtoaustralianasylumpoliciesandpracticesamixedmethodsstudy
_version_ 1724169583999320064