Household use of iodized salt in rural area

Background: Iodine deficiency is the world′s single greatest cause of preventable mental retardation. In developing countries, only 69% of households are consuming iodized salt. Objective: To assess knowledge and practices with respect to the current use of iodized salt, and to estimate its uptake a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rupali Roy, Manish Chaturvedi, Deepika Agrawal, Haroon Ali
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2016-01-01
Series:Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jfmpc.com/article.asp?issn=2249-4863;year=2016;volume=5;issue=1;spage=77;epage=81;aulast=Roy
id doaj-f4ed4c19e6b94e038a72284a5519a0c7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f4ed4c19e6b94e038a72284a5519a0c72020-11-24T22:25:07ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Family Medicine and Primary Care2249-48632016-01-0151778110.4103/2249-4863.184628Household use of iodized salt in rural areaRupali RoyManish ChaturvediDeepika AgrawalHaroon AliBackground: Iodine deficiency is the world′s single greatest cause of preventable mental retardation. In developing countries, only 69% of households are consuming iodized salt. Objective: To assess knowledge and practices with respect to the current use of iodized salt, and to estimate its uptake at the household level. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional survey was conducted in six villages under Rural Health Training Center. A total number of households surveyed were 253. The data collectors obtained verbal consent from the Family, and Pretested Standardized Questionnaire was administered in every selected household. The respondents were asked questions regarding salt purchasing and consumption habits, salt storage, awareness of iodized salt, and iodine deficiency diseases. Rapid iodized salt test kit (MBI kit) was used in the survey to assess iodine content in salt used in households. Results: In this study, 93.7% households were using packet salt. The most common source of information was a television (31.1%). More than half (53.8%) of the households were unaware of the benefits of iodine. About 62.5% of households were consuming adequately iodized salt. Significant association was found between the practice of storing salt in closed containers and use of packaged iodized salt (Chi-square value −37.6, P < 0.001), awareness about the benefits of iodine and type of salt used (P = 0.02) while no association was observed between the socioeconomic status and type of salt used in the household. Conclusions: Though the use of packet salt was more than 90%, adequately iodized salt was consumed only in 62.5%, and more than half of the subjects lacked the knowledge about iodine deficiency diseases.http://www.jfmpc.com/article.asp?issn=2249-4863;year=2016;volume=5;issue=1;spage=77;epage=81;aulast=RoyFieldhouseholdimplicationiodized saltpolicy makersrural
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rupali Roy
Manish Chaturvedi
Deepika Agrawal
Haroon Ali
spellingShingle Rupali Roy
Manish Chaturvedi
Deepika Agrawal
Haroon Ali
Household use of iodized salt in rural area
Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care
Field
household
implication
iodized salt
policy makers
rural
author_facet Rupali Roy
Manish Chaturvedi
Deepika Agrawal
Haroon Ali
author_sort Rupali Roy
title Household use of iodized salt in rural area
title_short Household use of iodized salt in rural area
title_full Household use of iodized salt in rural area
title_fullStr Household use of iodized salt in rural area
title_full_unstemmed Household use of iodized salt in rural area
title_sort household use of iodized salt in rural area
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care
issn 2249-4863
publishDate 2016-01-01
description Background: Iodine deficiency is the world′s single greatest cause of preventable mental retardation. In developing countries, only 69% of households are consuming iodized salt. Objective: To assess knowledge and practices with respect to the current use of iodized salt, and to estimate its uptake at the household level. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional survey was conducted in six villages under Rural Health Training Center. A total number of households surveyed were 253. The data collectors obtained verbal consent from the Family, and Pretested Standardized Questionnaire was administered in every selected household. The respondents were asked questions regarding salt purchasing and consumption habits, salt storage, awareness of iodized salt, and iodine deficiency diseases. Rapid iodized salt test kit (MBI kit) was used in the survey to assess iodine content in salt used in households. Results: In this study, 93.7% households were using packet salt. The most common source of information was a television (31.1%). More than half (53.8%) of the households were unaware of the benefits of iodine. About 62.5% of households were consuming adequately iodized salt. Significant association was found between the practice of storing salt in closed containers and use of packaged iodized salt (Chi-square value −37.6, P < 0.001), awareness about the benefits of iodine and type of salt used (P = 0.02) while no association was observed between the socioeconomic status and type of salt used in the household. Conclusions: Though the use of packet salt was more than 90%, adequately iodized salt was consumed only in 62.5%, and more than half of the subjects lacked the knowledge about iodine deficiency diseases.
topic Field
household
implication
iodized salt
policy makers
rural
url http://www.jfmpc.com/article.asp?issn=2249-4863;year=2016;volume=5;issue=1;spage=77;epage=81;aulast=Roy
work_keys_str_mv AT rupaliroy householduseofiodizedsaltinruralarea
AT manishchaturvedi householduseofiodizedsaltinruralarea
AT deepikaagrawal householduseofiodizedsaltinruralarea
AT haroonali householduseofiodizedsaltinruralarea
_version_ 1725759235396993024