Reviewing Peer Review
Peer review is widely accepted as the hallmark of scholarly, scientific publication. It helps journal editors determine whether research conclusions are justified and “new,” gives them an idea of the potential or actual significance of a work1 and adds a “human judgment” element to the academic pro...
Main Author: | José Florencio F. Lapeña |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Philippine Society of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Inc.
2014-06-01
|
Series: | Philippine Journal of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://pjohns.pso-hns.org/index.php/pjohns/article/view/447 |
Similar Items
-
Peer Review and the PJOHNS: Principles, Problems, and Promise
by: José Florencio F. Lapeña
Published: (2018-07-01) -
The “Peer” in “Peer Review”
by: Gad Perry, et al.
Published: (2011-12-01) -
Who Is (Likely) Peer-Reviewing Your Papers? A Partial Insight into the World’s Top Reviewers
by: Francesco Pomponi, et al.
Published: (2019-03-01) -
Peer review and publication delay
by: Fernandez-Llimos F, et al.
Published: (2019-03-01) -
Peer review - Why, when and how
by: Philip J. Steer, et al.
Published: (2021-02-01)