A comparative analysis of four different surgical methods for treatment of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus

Summary: Objectives: Although many surgical methods have been described for sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus treatment, the best option is still controversial. We aimed to compare postoperative outcomes of these different methods in terms of advantages and disadvantages. Methods: The records of 320 p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Uğur Ekici, Murat Kanlıöz, Murat Ferhat Ferhatoğlu, Abdulcabbar Kartal
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2019-10-01
Series:Asian Journal of Surgery
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1015958418307413
id doaj-f536582f66d94669af9a74e350df140c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f536582f66d94669af9a74e350df140c2020-11-25T01:33:56ZengElsevierAsian Journal of Surgery1015-95842019-10-014210907913A comparative analysis of four different surgical methods for treatment of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinusUğur Ekici0Murat Kanlıöz1Murat Ferhat Ferhatoğlu2Abdulcabbar Kartal3İstanbul Gelişim University Health Sciences Colleges, Health Administration Department, İstanbul, Turkey; Corresponding author. İstanbul Gelişim University Health Sciences Colleges, Health Administration Department, Cihangir Mahallesi, J. Kom. Er Hakan Öner Sokak No:1, Avcılar, İstanbul, 34310, Turkey.Lokman Hekim University Hospital, General Surgery Department, Ankara, TurkeyOkan University, General Surgery Department, İstanbul, TurkeyOkan University, General Surgery Department, İstanbul, TurkeySummary: Objectives: Although many surgical methods have been described for sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus treatment, the best option is still controversial. We aimed to compare postoperative outcomes of these different methods in terms of advantages and disadvantages. Methods: The records of 320 patients undergone surgery for primary or recurrent pilonidal sinus between May 2013 and May 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Demographical data, pre operative stories, wound site infection, seroma development, wound dehiscence, time of healing, duration of return to work, and if there is any recurrence of 303 patients included in the study were recorded. Upon wide local excision, the first surgeon performed marsupialisation and the lay open technique, second surgeon performed vertical excision and primary closure, third surgeon performed Limberg flap transposition and fourth surgeon performed Karydakis' flap transposition. Results: There was no significant difference between the patients in terms of demographical characteristics. The duration of surgery was statistically significantly higher in primary closure method (p = 0.001). The mean duration of return-to-work was statistically significantly lower in primary closure method (p = 0.002). In primary closure method, the recurrence rate was found to be statistically significantly higher than the other methods (p = 0.009). Conclusion: We do not suggest the use of primary closure method in treatment of pilonidal sinus. Because of lower rates of recurrence and shorter durations of return to work, the Karydakis and Limberg methods are seen as safer methods when compared to lay-open and marsupialization method. Keywords: Pilonidal sinüs, Limberg flap, Karydakis flap, Primary closure, Marsupialization and lay-openhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1015958418307413
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Uğur Ekici
Murat Kanlıöz
Murat Ferhat Ferhatoğlu
Abdulcabbar Kartal
spellingShingle Uğur Ekici
Murat Kanlıöz
Murat Ferhat Ferhatoğlu
Abdulcabbar Kartal
A comparative analysis of four different surgical methods for treatment of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus
Asian Journal of Surgery
author_facet Uğur Ekici
Murat Kanlıöz
Murat Ferhat Ferhatoğlu
Abdulcabbar Kartal
author_sort Uğur Ekici
title A comparative analysis of four different surgical methods for treatment of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus
title_short A comparative analysis of four different surgical methods for treatment of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus
title_full A comparative analysis of four different surgical methods for treatment of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus
title_fullStr A comparative analysis of four different surgical methods for treatment of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus
title_full_unstemmed A comparative analysis of four different surgical methods for treatment of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus
title_sort comparative analysis of four different surgical methods for treatment of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus
publisher Elsevier
series Asian Journal of Surgery
issn 1015-9584
publishDate 2019-10-01
description Summary: Objectives: Although many surgical methods have been described for sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus treatment, the best option is still controversial. We aimed to compare postoperative outcomes of these different methods in terms of advantages and disadvantages. Methods: The records of 320 patients undergone surgery for primary or recurrent pilonidal sinus between May 2013 and May 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Demographical data, pre operative stories, wound site infection, seroma development, wound dehiscence, time of healing, duration of return to work, and if there is any recurrence of 303 patients included in the study were recorded. Upon wide local excision, the first surgeon performed marsupialisation and the lay open technique, second surgeon performed vertical excision and primary closure, third surgeon performed Limberg flap transposition and fourth surgeon performed Karydakis' flap transposition. Results: There was no significant difference between the patients in terms of demographical characteristics. The duration of surgery was statistically significantly higher in primary closure method (p = 0.001). The mean duration of return-to-work was statistically significantly lower in primary closure method (p = 0.002). In primary closure method, the recurrence rate was found to be statistically significantly higher than the other methods (p = 0.009). Conclusion: We do not suggest the use of primary closure method in treatment of pilonidal sinus. Because of lower rates of recurrence and shorter durations of return to work, the Karydakis and Limberg methods are seen as safer methods when compared to lay-open and marsupialization method. Keywords: Pilonidal sinüs, Limberg flap, Karydakis flap, Primary closure, Marsupialization and lay-open
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1015958418307413
work_keys_str_mv AT ugurekici acomparativeanalysisoffourdifferentsurgicalmethodsfortreatmentofsacrococcygealpilonidalsinus
AT muratkanlıoz acomparativeanalysisoffourdifferentsurgicalmethodsfortreatmentofsacrococcygealpilonidalsinus
AT muratferhatferhatoglu acomparativeanalysisoffourdifferentsurgicalmethodsfortreatmentofsacrococcygealpilonidalsinus
AT abdulcabbarkartal acomparativeanalysisoffourdifferentsurgicalmethodsfortreatmentofsacrococcygealpilonidalsinus
AT ugurekici comparativeanalysisoffourdifferentsurgicalmethodsfortreatmentofsacrococcygealpilonidalsinus
AT muratkanlıoz comparativeanalysisoffourdifferentsurgicalmethodsfortreatmentofsacrococcygealpilonidalsinus
AT muratferhatferhatoglu comparativeanalysisoffourdifferentsurgicalmethodsfortreatmentofsacrococcygealpilonidalsinus
AT abdulcabbarkartal comparativeanalysisoffourdifferentsurgicalmethodsfortreatmentofsacrococcygealpilonidalsinus
_version_ 1725074824506638336