The Trade-Off Between Child Quantity and Child Quality and the Public Provision of Education: A Case Study in Rural Terengganu, Malaysia

The objective of this paper is to examine whether the theory of the child quantity-quality (CQQ) trade-off developed by Becker and Lewis (1973) is borne out by the data from a developing country. In brief, the theory states that households behave differently with respect to their mixture of child qu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nor Abdul Razak, Roslan Abdul Hakim, Russayani Ismail
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: UUM Press 2020-02-01
Series:Malaysian Management Journal
Online Access:https://www.scienceopen.com/document?vid=6bafb728-86d0-411e-a749-a42fb3f892e1
id doaj-f538ed9ced9a42328b4e6d4427c6a2fd
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f538ed9ced9a42328b4e6d4427c6a2fd2021-08-02T22:27:47ZengUUM PressMalaysian Management Journal0128-62262020-02-0110.32890/mmj.14.2010.8967The Trade-Off Between Child Quantity and Child Quality and the Public Provision of Education: A Case Study in Rural Terengganu, MalaysiaNor Abdul RazakRoslan Abdul HakimRussayani IsmailThe objective of this paper is to examine whether the theory of the child quantity-quality (CQQ) trade-off developed by Becker and Lewis (1973) is borne out by the data from a developing country. In brief, the theory states that households behave differently with respect to their mixture of child quantity and child quality depending on their standards of living (i.e. low-income households tend to choose child quantity at the expense of child quality, and the converse is true for high-income households). If the government provides enough support for education, however, this trade-off might be undermined. Using a sample of 885 children from a survey of 2,500 households in rural areas in Terengganu in 2009, we conducted an empirical analysis on the relationship between child quantity and child quality. In the baseline estimation as well as in a series of robustness check, our key findings are that there is a positive yet insignificant impact of child quantity on child quality. Accordingly, we take these results as mild evidence against the CQQ trade-off which, in turn, can be attributed to the magnitude of the public provision of education in Malaysia.  https://www.scienceopen.com/document?vid=6bafb728-86d0-411e-a749-a42fb3f892e1
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nor Abdul Razak
Roslan Abdul Hakim
Russayani Ismail
spellingShingle Nor Abdul Razak
Roslan Abdul Hakim
Russayani Ismail
The Trade-Off Between Child Quantity and Child Quality and the Public Provision of Education: A Case Study in Rural Terengganu, Malaysia
Malaysian Management Journal
author_facet Nor Abdul Razak
Roslan Abdul Hakim
Russayani Ismail
author_sort Nor Abdul Razak
title The Trade-Off Between Child Quantity and Child Quality and the Public Provision of Education: A Case Study in Rural Terengganu, Malaysia
title_short The Trade-Off Between Child Quantity and Child Quality and the Public Provision of Education: A Case Study in Rural Terengganu, Malaysia
title_full The Trade-Off Between Child Quantity and Child Quality and the Public Provision of Education: A Case Study in Rural Terengganu, Malaysia
title_fullStr The Trade-Off Between Child Quantity and Child Quality and the Public Provision of Education: A Case Study in Rural Terengganu, Malaysia
title_full_unstemmed The Trade-Off Between Child Quantity and Child Quality and the Public Provision of Education: A Case Study in Rural Terengganu, Malaysia
title_sort trade-off between child quantity and child quality and the public provision of education: a case study in rural terengganu, malaysia
publisher UUM Press
series Malaysian Management Journal
issn 0128-6226
publishDate 2020-02-01
description The objective of this paper is to examine whether the theory of the child quantity-quality (CQQ) trade-off developed by Becker and Lewis (1973) is borne out by the data from a developing country. In brief, the theory states that households behave differently with respect to their mixture of child quantity and child quality depending on their standards of living (i.e. low-income households tend to choose child quantity at the expense of child quality, and the converse is true for high-income households). If the government provides enough support for education, however, this trade-off might be undermined. Using a sample of 885 children from a survey of 2,500 households in rural areas in Terengganu in 2009, we conducted an empirical analysis on the relationship between child quantity and child quality. In the baseline estimation as well as in a series of robustness check, our key findings are that there is a positive yet insignificant impact of child quantity on child quality. Accordingly, we take these results as mild evidence against the CQQ trade-off which, in turn, can be attributed to the magnitude of the public provision of education in Malaysia.  
url https://www.scienceopen.com/document?vid=6bafb728-86d0-411e-a749-a42fb3f892e1
work_keys_str_mv AT norabdulrazak thetradeoffbetweenchildquantityandchildqualityandthepublicprovisionofeducationacasestudyinruralterengganumalaysia
AT roslanabdulhakim thetradeoffbetweenchildquantityandchildqualityandthepublicprovisionofeducationacasestudyinruralterengganumalaysia
AT russayaniismail thetradeoffbetweenchildquantityandchildqualityandthepublicprovisionofeducationacasestudyinruralterengganumalaysia
AT norabdulrazak tradeoffbetweenchildquantityandchildqualityandthepublicprovisionofeducationacasestudyinruralterengganumalaysia
AT roslanabdulhakim tradeoffbetweenchildquantityandchildqualityandthepublicprovisionofeducationacasestudyinruralterengganumalaysia
AT russayaniismail tradeoffbetweenchildquantityandchildqualityandthepublicprovisionofeducationacasestudyinruralterengganumalaysia
_version_ 1721226359403970560