Can Zoos Ever Be Big Enough for Large Wild Animals? A Review Using an Expert Panel Assessment of the Psychological Priorities of the Amur Tiger (<i>Panthera tigris altaica</i>) as a Model Species

The ecology of large, wide-ranging carnivores appears to make them vulnerable to conservation challenges in the wild and welfare challenges in captivity. This poses an ethical dilemma for the zoo community and supports the case that there is a need to reconsider prevailing management paradigms for t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jake Stuart Veasey
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-08-01
Series:Animals
Subjects:
zoo
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/10/9/1536
id doaj-f53a1367ea8d46cf973067888a1d2a38
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f53a1367ea8d46cf973067888a1d2a382020-11-25T03:43:02ZengMDPI AGAnimals2076-26152020-08-01101536153610.3390/ani10091536Can Zoos Ever Be Big Enough for Large Wild Animals? A Review Using an Expert Panel Assessment of the Psychological Priorities of the Amur Tiger (<i>Panthera tigris altaica</i>) as a Model SpeciesJake Stuart Veasey0School of Animal, Rural and Environmental Sciences, Nottingham Trent University, Southwell NG25 0QF, UKThe ecology of large, wide-ranging carnivores appears to make them vulnerable to conservation challenges in the wild and welfare challenges in captivity. This poses an ethical dilemma for the zoo community and supports the case that there is a need to reconsider prevailing management paradigms for these species in captivity. Whilst the welfare challenges wide ranging carnivores face have been attributed to reduced ranging opportunities associated with the decreased size of captive habitats, attempts to augment wild carnivore welfare in captivity typically focus on behaviours linked to hunting. Thus far, this has yet to result in the systematic elimination of signs of compromised welfare amongst captive carnivores. Here an assessment is carried out to identify the likely welfare priorities for Amur tigers, which, as one of the widest ranging terrestrial carnivores, serves as an excellent exemplar for species experiencing extreme compression of their ranging opportunities in captivity. These priorities are then used to consider novel strategies to address the welfare challenges associated with existing management paradigms, and in particular, attempt to overcome the issue of restricted space. The insights generated here have wider implications for other species experiencing substantive habitat compression in captivity. It is proposed here that the impact of habitat compression on captive carnivore welfare may not be a consequence of the reduction in habitat size per se, but rather the reduction in cognitive opportunities that likely covary with size, and that this should inform strategies to augment welfare.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/10/9/1536Amur tigeranimal welfarezoopsychological prioritybehavioural need
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jake Stuart Veasey
spellingShingle Jake Stuart Veasey
Can Zoos Ever Be Big Enough for Large Wild Animals? A Review Using an Expert Panel Assessment of the Psychological Priorities of the Amur Tiger (<i>Panthera tigris altaica</i>) as a Model Species
Animals
Amur tiger
animal welfare
zoo
psychological priority
behavioural need
author_facet Jake Stuart Veasey
author_sort Jake Stuart Veasey
title Can Zoos Ever Be Big Enough for Large Wild Animals? A Review Using an Expert Panel Assessment of the Psychological Priorities of the Amur Tiger (<i>Panthera tigris altaica</i>) as a Model Species
title_short Can Zoos Ever Be Big Enough for Large Wild Animals? A Review Using an Expert Panel Assessment of the Psychological Priorities of the Amur Tiger (<i>Panthera tigris altaica</i>) as a Model Species
title_full Can Zoos Ever Be Big Enough for Large Wild Animals? A Review Using an Expert Panel Assessment of the Psychological Priorities of the Amur Tiger (<i>Panthera tigris altaica</i>) as a Model Species
title_fullStr Can Zoos Ever Be Big Enough for Large Wild Animals? A Review Using an Expert Panel Assessment of the Psychological Priorities of the Amur Tiger (<i>Panthera tigris altaica</i>) as a Model Species
title_full_unstemmed Can Zoos Ever Be Big Enough for Large Wild Animals? A Review Using an Expert Panel Assessment of the Psychological Priorities of the Amur Tiger (<i>Panthera tigris altaica</i>) as a Model Species
title_sort can zoos ever be big enough for large wild animals? a review using an expert panel assessment of the psychological priorities of the amur tiger (<i>panthera tigris altaica</i>) as a model species
publisher MDPI AG
series Animals
issn 2076-2615
publishDate 2020-08-01
description The ecology of large, wide-ranging carnivores appears to make them vulnerable to conservation challenges in the wild and welfare challenges in captivity. This poses an ethical dilemma for the zoo community and supports the case that there is a need to reconsider prevailing management paradigms for these species in captivity. Whilst the welfare challenges wide ranging carnivores face have been attributed to reduced ranging opportunities associated with the decreased size of captive habitats, attempts to augment wild carnivore welfare in captivity typically focus on behaviours linked to hunting. Thus far, this has yet to result in the systematic elimination of signs of compromised welfare amongst captive carnivores. Here an assessment is carried out to identify the likely welfare priorities for Amur tigers, which, as one of the widest ranging terrestrial carnivores, serves as an excellent exemplar for species experiencing extreme compression of their ranging opportunities in captivity. These priorities are then used to consider novel strategies to address the welfare challenges associated with existing management paradigms, and in particular, attempt to overcome the issue of restricted space. The insights generated here have wider implications for other species experiencing substantive habitat compression in captivity. It is proposed here that the impact of habitat compression on captive carnivore welfare may not be a consequence of the reduction in habitat size per se, but rather the reduction in cognitive opportunities that likely covary with size, and that this should inform strategies to augment welfare.
topic Amur tiger
animal welfare
zoo
psychological priority
behavioural need
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/10/9/1536
work_keys_str_mv AT jakestuartveasey canzooseverbebigenoughforlargewildanimalsareviewusinganexpertpanelassessmentofthepsychologicalprioritiesoftheamurtigeripantheratigrisaltaicaiasamodelspecies
_version_ 1724521700426514432