Beliefs and social behavior in a multi-period ultimatum game

We conduct a multi-period ultimatum game in which we elicit players’ beliefs. Responders do not predict accurately the amount that will be offered to them, and do not get better in their predictions over time. At the individual level we see some effect of the mistake in expectations in the previous...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ofer Haim Azar, Yaron eLahav, Alisa eVoslinsky
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-02-01
Series:Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00029/full
id doaj-f53d497f9ff4485b83e9ac1338b7a880
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f53d497f9ff4485b83e9ac1338b7a8802020-11-24T20:59:20ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience1662-51532015-02-01910.3389/fnbeh.2015.00029123331Beliefs and social behavior in a multi-period ultimatum gameOfer Haim Azar0Yaron eLahav1Alisa eVoslinsky2Ben-Gurion University of the NegevBen-Gurion University of the NegevBen-Gurion University of the NegevWe conduct a multi-period ultimatum game in which we elicit players’ beliefs. Responders do not predict accurately the amount that will be offered to them, and do not get better in their predictions over time. At the individual level we see some effect of the mistake in expectations in the previous period on the responder’s expectation about the offer in the current period, but this effect is relatively small. The proposers’ beliefs about the minimum amount that responders will accept is significantly higher than the minimum amount responders believe will be accepted by other responders. The proposer’s belief about the minimal acceptable offer does not change following a rejection. Nevertheless, the proposer’s offer in the next period does increase following a rejection. The probability of rejection increases when the responder has higher expectations about the amount that will be offered to him or higher beliefs about the minimal amount that other responders will accept.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00029/fullultimatum gamesocial preferencesBehavioral Economicsbeliefsexperimental economics
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ofer Haim Azar
Yaron eLahav
Alisa eVoslinsky
spellingShingle Ofer Haim Azar
Yaron eLahav
Alisa eVoslinsky
Beliefs and social behavior in a multi-period ultimatum game
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
ultimatum game
social preferences
Behavioral Economics
beliefs
experimental economics
author_facet Ofer Haim Azar
Yaron eLahav
Alisa eVoslinsky
author_sort Ofer Haim Azar
title Beliefs and social behavior in a multi-period ultimatum game
title_short Beliefs and social behavior in a multi-period ultimatum game
title_full Beliefs and social behavior in a multi-period ultimatum game
title_fullStr Beliefs and social behavior in a multi-period ultimatum game
title_full_unstemmed Beliefs and social behavior in a multi-period ultimatum game
title_sort beliefs and social behavior in a multi-period ultimatum game
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
issn 1662-5153
publishDate 2015-02-01
description We conduct a multi-period ultimatum game in which we elicit players’ beliefs. Responders do not predict accurately the amount that will be offered to them, and do not get better in their predictions over time. At the individual level we see some effect of the mistake in expectations in the previous period on the responder’s expectation about the offer in the current period, but this effect is relatively small. The proposers’ beliefs about the minimum amount that responders will accept is significantly higher than the minimum amount responders believe will be accepted by other responders. The proposer’s belief about the minimal acceptable offer does not change following a rejection. Nevertheless, the proposer’s offer in the next period does increase following a rejection. The probability of rejection increases when the responder has higher expectations about the amount that will be offered to him or higher beliefs about the minimal amount that other responders will accept.
topic ultimatum game
social preferences
Behavioral Economics
beliefs
experimental economics
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00029/full
work_keys_str_mv AT oferhaimazar beliefsandsocialbehaviorinamultiperiodultimatumgame
AT yaronelahav beliefsandsocialbehaviorinamultiperiodultimatumgame
AT alisaevoslinsky beliefsandsocialbehaviorinamultiperiodultimatumgame
_version_ 1716782799863676928