Comparison of the Complications in Vertical Rectus Abdominis Musculocutaneous Flap with Non-Reconstructed Cases after Pelvic Exenteration

BackgroundPerineal reconstruction following pelvic exenteration is a challenging area in plastic surgery. Its advantages include preventing complications by obliterating the pelvic dead space and minimizing the scar by using the previous abdominal incision and a vertical rectus abdominis musculocuta...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Heechang Jeon, Eul Sik Yoon, Hi-Jin You, Hyon-Surk Kim, Byung-Il Lee, Seung Ha Park
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons 2014-11-01
Series:Archives of Plastic Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.e-aps.org/upload/pdf/aps-41-722.pdf
id doaj-f58da8d9a5c74839be0481b5938ff26a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f58da8d9a5c74839be0481b5938ff26a2020-11-24T23:37:19ZengKorean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive SurgeonsArchives of Plastic Surgery2234-61632234-61712014-11-0141672272710.5999/aps.2014.41.6.722437Comparison of the Complications in Vertical Rectus Abdominis Musculocutaneous Flap with Non-Reconstructed Cases after Pelvic ExenterationHeechang Jeon0Eul Sik Yoon1Hi-Jin You2Hyon-Surk Kim3Byung-Il Lee4Seung Ha Park5Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.BackgroundPerineal reconstruction following pelvic exenteration is a challenging area in plastic surgery. Its advantages include preventing complications by obliterating the pelvic dead space and minimizing the scar by using the previous abdominal incision and a vertical rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (VRAM) flap. However, only a few studies have compared the complications and the outcomes following pelvic exenteration between cases with and without a VRAM flap. In this study, we aimed to compare the complications and the outcomes following pelvic exenteration with or without VRAM flap coverage.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the cases of nine patients for whom transpelvic VRAM flaps were created following pelvic exenteration due to pelvic malignancy. The complications and outcomes in these patients were compared with those of another nine patients who did not undergo such reconstruction.ResultsFlap reconstruction was successful in eight cases, with minor complications such as wound infection and dehiscence. In all cases in the reconstructed group (n=9), structural integrity was maintained and major complications including bowel obstruction and infection were prevented by obliterating the pelvic dead space. In contrast, in the control group (n=9), peritonitis and bowel obstruction occurred in 1 case (11%).ConclusionsDespite the possibility of flap failure and minor complications, a VRAM flap can result in adequate perineal reconstruction to prevent major complications of pelvic exenteration.http://www.e-aps.org/upload/pdf/aps-41-722.pdfPelvic exenterationRectus abdominisMusculocutaneous flap
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Heechang Jeon
Eul Sik Yoon
Hi-Jin You
Hyon-Surk Kim
Byung-Il Lee
Seung Ha Park
spellingShingle Heechang Jeon
Eul Sik Yoon
Hi-Jin You
Hyon-Surk Kim
Byung-Il Lee
Seung Ha Park
Comparison of the Complications in Vertical Rectus Abdominis Musculocutaneous Flap with Non-Reconstructed Cases after Pelvic Exenteration
Archives of Plastic Surgery
Pelvic exenteration
Rectus abdominis
Musculocutaneous flap
author_facet Heechang Jeon
Eul Sik Yoon
Hi-Jin You
Hyon-Surk Kim
Byung-Il Lee
Seung Ha Park
author_sort Heechang Jeon
title Comparison of the Complications in Vertical Rectus Abdominis Musculocutaneous Flap with Non-Reconstructed Cases after Pelvic Exenteration
title_short Comparison of the Complications in Vertical Rectus Abdominis Musculocutaneous Flap with Non-Reconstructed Cases after Pelvic Exenteration
title_full Comparison of the Complications in Vertical Rectus Abdominis Musculocutaneous Flap with Non-Reconstructed Cases after Pelvic Exenteration
title_fullStr Comparison of the Complications in Vertical Rectus Abdominis Musculocutaneous Flap with Non-Reconstructed Cases after Pelvic Exenteration
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the Complications in Vertical Rectus Abdominis Musculocutaneous Flap with Non-Reconstructed Cases after Pelvic Exenteration
title_sort comparison of the complications in vertical rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap with non-reconstructed cases after pelvic exenteration
publisher Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons
series Archives of Plastic Surgery
issn 2234-6163
2234-6171
publishDate 2014-11-01
description BackgroundPerineal reconstruction following pelvic exenteration is a challenging area in plastic surgery. Its advantages include preventing complications by obliterating the pelvic dead space and minimizing the scar by using the previous abdominal incision and a vertical rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (VRAM) flap. However, only a few studies have compared the complications and the outcomes following pelvic exenteration between cases with and without a VRAM flap. In this study, we aimed to compare the complications and the outcomes following pelvic exenteration with or without VRAM flap coverage.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the cases of nine patients for whom transpelvic VRAM flaps were created following pelvic exenteration due to pelvic malignancy. The complications and outcomes in these patients were compared with those of another nine patients who did not undergo such reconstruction.ResultsFlap reconstruction was successful in eight cases, with minor complications such as wound infection and dehiscence. In all cases in the reconstructed group (n=9), structural integrity was maintained and major complications including bowel obstruction and infection were prevented by obliterating the pelvic dead space. In contrast, in the control group (n=9), peritonitis and bowel obstruction occurred in 1 case (11%).ConclusionsDespite the possibility of flap failure and minor complications, a VRAM flap can result in adequate perineal reconstruction to prevent major complications of pelvic exenteration.
topic Pelvic exenteration
Rectus abdominis
Musculocutaneous flap
url http://www.e-aps.org/upload/pdf/aps-41-722.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT heechangjeon comparisonofthecomplicationsinverticalrectusabdominismusculocutaneousflapwithnonreconstructedcasesafterpelvicexenteration
AT eulsikyoon comparisonofthecomplicationsinverticalrectusabdominismusculocutaneousflapwithnonreconstructedcasesafterpelvicexenteration
AT hijinyou comparisonofthecomplicationsinverticalrectusabdominismusculocutaneousflapwithnonreconstructedcasesafterpelvicexenteration
AT hyonsurkkim comparisonofthecomplicationsinverticalrectusabdominismusculocutaneousflapwithnonreconstructedcasesafterpelvicexenteration
AT byungillee comparisonofthecomplicationsinverticalrectusabdominismusculocutaneousflapwithnonreconstructedcasesafterpelvicexenteration
AT seunghapark comparisonofthecomplicationsinverticalrectusabdominismusculocutaneousflapwithnonreconstructedcasesafterpelvicexenteration
_version_ 1725520452500062208