The Difference of the Effect of Reciprocal and Teaching Style on the Learning Outcomes of Service Basic Techniques

This study aims to see the differences in the effect of reciprocal and inclusion teaching styles on learning outcomes of basic service techniques. The type of this research is a quasi-experimental. The sample in this study were students of the Department of Sports Education, Faculty of Sports Scienc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andre Igoresky, James Tangkudung, Taufik Rihatno
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universitas Negeri Semarang 2020-11-01
Series:Active: journal of physical education, sport, health and recreation
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/peshr/article/view/41026
id doaj-f5a0694ee4614f7bbd54503139b191d8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f5a0694ee4614f7bbd54503139b191d82021-09-02T17:52:06ZengUniversitas Negeri SemarangActive: journal of physical education, sport, health and recreation2252-67732460-724X2020-11-019316216710.15294/active.v9i3.4102641026The Difference of the Effect of Reciprocal and Teaching Style on the Learning Outcomes of Service Basic TechniquesAndre Igoresky0James Tangkudung1Taufik Rihatno2Universitas Negeri PadangUniversitas Negeri JakartaUniversitas Negeri JakartaThis study aims to see the differences in the effect of reciprocal and inclusion teaching styles on learning outcomes of basic service techniques. The type of this research is a quasi-experimental. The sample in this study were students of the Department of Sports Education, Faculty of Sports Science, Padang State University (UNP) 2018, as many as 44 people. The data were collected by conducting a placement test. Data analysis and hypothesis testing used comparative analysis techniques using the mean difference test formula (t test) with a significant level a = 0.05. From the data analysis, it can be concluded that there is a difference in the effect of reciprocal and inclusion teaching style on the learning outcomes of student basic service techniques, with the result of the “t” test coefficient, namely tcount (3.38) which is greater than ttable (1.680).https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/peshr/article/view/41026teaching style; reciprocal; inclusion; service basic techniques
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Andre Igoresky
James Tangkudung
Taufik Rihatno
spellingShingle Andre Igoresky
James Tangkudung
Taufik Rihatno
The Difference of the Effect of Reciprocal and Teaching Style on the Learning Outcomes of Service Basic Techniques
Active: journal of physical education, sport, health and recreation
teaching style; reciprocal; inclusion; service basic techniques
author_facet Andre Igoresky
James Tangkudung
Taufik Rihatno
author_sort Andre Igoresky
title The Difference of the Effect of Reciprocal and Teaching Style on the Learning Outcomes of Service Basic Techniques
title_short The Difference of the Effect of Reciprocal and Teaching Style on the Learning Outcomes of Service Basic Techniques
title_full The Difference of the Effect of Reciprocal and Teaching Style on the Learning Outcomes of Service Basic Techniques
title_fullStr The Difference of the Effect of Reciprocal and Teaching Style on the Learning Outcomes of Service Basic Techniques
title_full_unstemmed The Difference of the Effect of Reciprocal and Teaching Style on the Learning Outcomes of Service Basic Techniques
title_sort difference of the effect of reciprocal and teaching style on the learning outcomes of service basic techniques
publisher Universitas Negeri Semarang
series Active: journal of physical education, sport, health and recreation
issn 2252-6773
2460-724X
publishDate 2020-11-01
description This study aims to see the differences in the effect of reciprocal and inclusion teaching styles on learning outcomes of basic service techniques. The type of this research is a quasi-experimental. The sample in this study were students of the Department of Sports Education, Faculty of Sports Science, Padang State University (UNP) 2018, as many as 44 people. The data were collected by conducting a placement test. Data analysis and hypothesis testing used comparative analysis techniques using the mean difference test formula (t test) with a significant level a = 0.05. From the data analysis, it can be concluded that there is a difference in the effect of reciprocal and inclusion teaching style on the learning outcomes of student basic service techniques, with the result of the “t” test coefficient, namely tcount (3.38) which is greater than ttable (1.680).
topic teaching style; reciprocal; inclusion; service basic techniques
url https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/peshr/article/view/41026
work_keys_str_mv AT andreigoresky thedifferenceoftheeffectofreciprocalandteachingstyleonthelearningoutcomesofservicebasictechniques
AT jamestangkudung thedifferenceoftheeffectofreciprocalandteachingstyleonthelearningoutcomesofservicebasictechniques
AT taufikrihatno thedifferenceoftheeffectofreciprocalandteachingstyleonthelearningoutcomesofservicebasictechniques
AT andreigoresky differenceoftheeffectofreciprocalandteachingstyleonthelearningoutcomesofservicebasictechniques
AT jamestangkudung differenceoftheeffectofreciprocalandteachingstyleonthelearningoutcomesofservicebasictechniques
AT taufikrihatno differenceoftheeffectofreciprocalandteachingstyleonthelearningoutcomesofservicebasictechniques
_version_ 1721171912885796864