The Difference of the Effect of Reciprocal and Teaching Style on the Learning Outcomes of Service Basic Techniques
This study aims to see the differences in the effect of reciprocal and inclusion teaching styles on learning outcomes of basic service techniques. The type of this research is a quasi-experimental. The sample in this study were students of the Department of Sports Education, Faculty of Sports Scienc...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universitas Negeri Semarang
2020-11-01
|
Series: | Active: journal of physical education, sport, health and recreation |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/peshr/article/view/41026 |
id |
doaj-f5a0694ee4614f7bbd54503139b191d8 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-f5a0694ee4614f7bbd54503139b191d82021-09-02T17:52:06ZengUniversitas Negeri SemarangActive: journal of physical education, sport, health and recreation2252-67732460-724X2020-11-019316216710.15294/active.v9i3.4102641026The Difference of the Effect of Reciprocal and Teaching Style on the Learning Outcomes of Service Basic TechniquesAndre Igoresky0James Tangkudung1Taufik Rihatno2Universitas Negeri PadangUniversitas Negeri JakartaUniversitas Negeri JakartaThis study aims to see the differences in the effect of reciprocal and inclusion teaching styles on learning outcomes of basic service techniques. The type of this research is a quasi-experimental. The sample in this study were students of the Department of Sports Education, Faculty of Sports Science, Padang State University (UNP) 2018, as many as 44 people. The data were collected by conducting a placement test. Data analysis and hypothesis testing used comparative analysis techniques using the mean difference test formula (t test) with a significant level a = 0.05. From the data analysis, it can be concluded that there is a difference in the effect of reciprocal and inclusion teaching style on the learning outcomes of student basic service techniques, with the result of the “t” test coefficient, namely tcount (3.38) which is greater than ttable (1.680).https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/peshr/article/view/41026teaching style; reciprocal; inclusion; service basic techniques |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Andre Igoresky James Tangkudung Taufik Rihatno |
spellingShingle |
Andre Igoresky James Tangkudung Taufik Rihatno The Difference of the Effect of Reciprocal and Teaching Style on the Learning Outcomes of Service Basic Techniques Active: journal of physical education, sport, health and recreation teaching style; reciprocal; inclusion; service basic techniques |
author_facet |
Andre Igoresky James Tangkudung Taufik Rihatno |
author_sort |
Andre Igoresky |
title |
The Difference of the Effect of Reciprocal and Teaching Style on the Learning Outcomes of Service Basic Techniques |
title_short |
The Difference of the Effect of Reciprocal and Teaching Style on the Learning Outcomes of Service Basic Techniques |
title_full |
The Difference of the Effect of Reciprocal and Teaching Style on the Learning Outcomes of Service Basic Techniques |
title_fullStr |
The Difference of the Effect of Reciprocal and Teaching Style on the Learning Outcomes of Service Basic Techniques |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Difference of the Effect of Reciprocal and Teaching Style on the Learning Outcomes of Service Basic Techniques |
title_sort |
difference of the effect of reciprocal and teaching style on the learning outcomes of service basic techniques |
publisher |
Universitas Negeri Semarang |
series |
Active: journal of physical education, sport, health and recreation |
issn |
2252-6773 2460-724X |
publishDate |
2020-11-01 |
description |
This study aims to see the differences in the effect of reciprocal and inclusion teaching styles on learning outcomes of basic service techniques. The type of this research is a quasi-experimental. The sample in this study were students of the Department of Sports Education, Faculty of Sports Science, Padang State University (UNP) 2018, as many as 44 people. The data were collected by conducting a placement test. Data analysis and hypothesis testing used comparative analysis techniques using the mean difference test formula (t test) with a significant level a = 0.05. From the data analysis, it can be concluded that there is a difference in the effect of reciprocal and inclusion teaching style on the learning outcomes of student basic service techniques, with the result of the “t” test coefficient, namely tcount (3.38) which is greater than ttable (1.680). |
topic |
teaching style; reciprocal; inclusion; service basic techniques |
url |
https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/peshr/article/view/41026 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT andreigoresky thedifferenceoftheeffectofreciprocalandteachingstyleonthelearningoutcomesofservicebasictechniques AT jamestangkudung thedifferenceoftheeffectofreciprocalandteachingstyleonthelearningoutcomesofservicebasictechniques AT taufikrihatno thedifferenceoftheeffectofreciprocalandteachingstyleonthelearningoutcomesofservicebasictechniques AT andreigoresky differenceoftheeffectofreciprocalandteachingstyleonthelearningoutcomesofservicebasictechniques AT jamestangkudung differenceoftheeffectofreciprocalandteachingstyleonthelearningoutcomesofservicebasictechniques AT taufikrihatno differenceoftheeffectofreciprocalandteachingstyleonthelearningoutcomesofservicebasictechniques |
_version_ |
1721171912885796864 |