Root disease can rival fire and harvest in reducing forest carbon storage
Abstract Root diseases are known to suppress forest regeneration and reduce growth rates, and they may become more common as susceptible tree species become maladapted in parts of their historic ranges due to climate change. However, current ecosystem models do not track the effects of root disease...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2016-11-01
|
Series: | Ecosphere |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1569 |
id |
doaj-f5a24963832b46a29c0eb30e67ec4792 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-f5a24963832b46a29c0eb30e67ec47922020-11-25T01:23:31ZengWileyEcosphere2150-89252016-11-01711n/an/a10.1002/ecs2.1569Root disease can rival fire and harvest in reducing forest carbon storageSean P. Healey0Crystal L. Raymond1I. Blakey Lockman2Alexander J. Hernandez3Chris Garrard4Chengquan Huang5U.S. Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station 507 25th Street Ogden Utah 84401 USASeattle City Light City of Seattle 700 5th Avenue Seattle Washington 98124 USAU.S. Forest Service State and Private Forestry 200 East Broadway Missoula Montana 59807 USACollege of Natural Resources Utah State University 5275 Old Main Hill Logan Utah 84322 USACollege of Natural Resources Utah State University 5275 Old Main Hill Logan Utah 84322 USADepartment of Geographical Sciences University of Maryland 1165 LeFrak Hall College Park Maryland 20742 USAAbstract Root diseases are known to suppress forest regeneration and reduce growth rates, and they may become more common as susceptible tree species become maladapted in parts of their historic ranges due to climate change. However, current ecosystem models do not track the effects of root disease on net productivity, and there has been little research on how the dynamics of root disease affect carbon (C) storage and productivity across infected landscapes. We compared the effects of root disease against the effects of other types of forest disturbance across six national forest landscapes, 1990–2011. This was enabled by a monitoring tool called the Forest Carbon Management Framework (ForCaMF), which makes use of ground inventory data, an empirical growth model, and time series of Landsat satellite imagery. Despite several large fires that burned across these landscapes during the study period, retrospective ForCaMF analysis showed that fire and root disease had approximately equal impacts on C storage. Relative to C accumulation that would have occurred in their absence, fires from 1990 to 2011 were estimated to reduce regionwide C storage by 215.3 ± 19.1 g/m2 C, while disease in the same period was estimated to reduce storage by 211.4 ± 59.9 g/m2 C. Harvest (75.5 ± 13.5 g/m2 C) and bark beetle activity (14.8 ± 12.5 g/m2 C) were less important. While long‐term disturbance processes such as root disease have generally been ignored by tools informing management of forest C storage, the recent history of several national forests suggests that such disturbances can be just as important to the C cycle as more conspicuous events like wildfires.https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1569carbonforest disturbanceforest managementforest pathologyroot disease |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Sean P. Healey Crystal L. Raymond I. Blakey Lockman Alexander J. Hernandez Chris Garrard Chengquan Huang |
spellingShingle |
Sean P. Healey Crystal L. Raymond I. Blakey Lockman Alexander J. Hernandez Chris Garrard Chengquan Huang Root disease can rival fire and harvest in reducing forest carbon storage Ecosphere carbon forest disturbance forest management forest pathology root disease |
author_facet |
Sean P. Healey Crystal L. Raymond I. Blakey Lockman Alexander J. Hernandez Chris Garrard Chengquan Huang |
author_sort |
Sean P. Healey |
title |
Root disease can rival fire and harvest in reducing forest carbon storage |
title_short |
Root disease can rival fire and harvest in reducing forest carbon storage |
title_full |
Root disease can rival fire and harvest in reducing forest carbon storage |
title_fullStr |
Root disease can rival fire and harvest in reducing forest carbon storage |
title_full_unstemmed |
Root disease can rival fire and harvest in reducing forest carbon storage |
title_sort |
root disease can rival fire and harvest in reducing forest carbon storage |
publisher |
Wiley |
series |
Ecosphere |
issn |
2150-8925 |
publishDate |
2016-11-01 |
description |
Abstract Root diseases are known to suppress forest regeneration and reduce growth rates, and they may become more common as susceptible tree species become maladapted in parts of their historic ranges due to climate change. However, current ecosystem models do not track the effects of root disease on net productivity, and there has been little research on how the dynamics of root disease affect carbon (C) storage and productivity across infected landscapes. We compared the effects of root disease against the effects of other types of forest disturbance across six national forest landscapes, 1990–2011. This was enabled by a monitoring tool called the Forest Carbon Management Framework (ForCaMF), which makes use of ground inventory data, an empirical growth model, and time series of Landsat satellite imagery. Despite several large fires that burned across these landscapes during the study period, retrospective ForCaMF analysis showed that fire and root disease had approximately equal impacts on C storage. Relative to C accumulation that would have occurred in their absence, fires from 1990 to 2011 were estimated to reduce regionwide C storage by 215.3 ± 19.1 g/m2 C, while disease in the same period was estimated to reduce storage by 211.4 ± 59.9 g/m2 C. Harvest (75.5 ± 13.5 g/m2 C) and bark beetle activity (14.8 ± 12.5 g/m2 C) were less important. While long‐term disturbance processes such as root disease have generally been ignored by tools informing management of forest C storage, the recent history of several national forests suggests that such disturbances can be just as important to the C cycle as more conspicuous events like wildfires. |
topic |
carbon forest disturbance forest management forest pathology root disease |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1569 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT seanphealey rootdiseasecanrivalfireandharvestinreducingforestcarbonstorage AT crystallraymond rootdiseasecanrivalfireandharvestinreducingforestcarbonstorage AT iblakeylockman rootdiseasecanrivalfireandharvestinreducingforestcarbonstorage AT alexanderjhernandez rootdiseasecanrivalfireandharvestinreducingforestcarbonstorage AT chrisgarrard rootdiseasecanrivalfireandharvestinreducingforestcarbonstorage AT chengquanhuang rootdiseasecanrivalfireandharvestinreducingforestcarbonstorage |
_version_ |
1725121771330338816 |