Comprehensive comparison and analysis of non-inverting buck boost and conventional buck boost converters

The non-inverting buck boost (NIBB) converter has attracted significant attention in recent years, as it shares ground between input and output, and the voltage stress of switches is lower. In order to investigate the differences between NIBB and conventional buck boost converters, a comprehensive c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xing Weng, Xiang Xiao, Weibin He, Yongyan Zhou, Yu Shen, Wei Zhao, Zhengming Zhao
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2019-02-01
Series:The Journal of Engineering
Subjects:
Online Access:https://digital-library.theiet.org/content/journals/10.1049/joe.2018.8373
id doaj-f5a585e5f9e84cad8d69439c383f1a65
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f5a585e5f9e84cad8d69439c383f1a652021-04-02T09:34:58ZengWileyThe Journal of Engineering2051-33052019-02-0110.1049/joe.2018.8373JOE.2018.8373Comprehensive comparison and analysis of non-inverting buck boost and conventional buck boost convertersXing Weng0Xiang Xiao1Weibin He2Yongyan Zhou3Yu Shen4Wei Zhao5Zhengming Zhao6Tsinghua UniversityGuangdong Electric Power Research InstituteGuangdong Power Grid CompanyGuangdong Electric Power Research InstituteTsinghua UniversityGuangdong Electric Power Research InstituteTsinghua UniversityThe non-inverting buck boost (NIBB) converter has attracted significant attention in recent years, as it shares ground between input and output, and the voltage stress of switches is lower. In order to investigate the differences between NIBB and conventional buck boost converters, a comprehensive comparison and analysis of these two converters were conducted in terms of their operation principles, which includes multi-mode control strategy and dual-edge modulation here, and also the characteristics of switches and passive components in the two converters were analysed. The results show that NIBB is better than conventional buck boost circuit in these aspects of electrical stress, power loss, cost, passive component volume, and so on. Two prototypes for the two converters with 10 kW/20 kHz were designed and simulated, respectively, for verifying the results. Analytical and simulated results confirmed the conclusions.https://digital-library.theiet.org/content/journals/10.1049/joe.2018.8373switching convertorsDC-DC power convertorsconventional buck boost convertersconventional buck boost circuitnoninverting buck boost converterNIBB convertersvoltage stressmultimode controldual-edge modulationpassive componentselectrical stresspassive component volumepower 10.0 kWfrequency 20.0 kHz
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Xing Weng
Xiang Xiao
Weibin He
Yongyan Zhou
Yu Shen
Wei Zhao
Zhengming Zhao
spellingShingle Xing Weng
Xiang Xiao
Weibin He
Yongyan Zhou
Yu Shen
Wei Zhao
Zhengming Zhao
Comprehensive comparison and analysis of non-inverting buck boost and conventional buck boost converters
The Journal of Engineering
switching convertors
DC-DC power convertors
conventional buck boost converters
conventional buck boost circuit
noninverting buck boost converter
NIBB converters
voltage stress
multimode control
dual-edge modulation
passive components
electrical stress
passive component volume
power 10.0 kW
frequency 20.0 kHz
author_facet Xing Weng
Xiang Xiao
Weibin He
Yongyan Zhou
Yu Shen
Wei Zhao
Zhengming Zhao
author_sort Xing Weng
title Comprehensive comparison and analysis of non-inverting buck boost and conventional buck boost converters
title_short Comprehensive comparison and analysis of non-inverting buck boost and conventional buck boost converters
title_full Comprehensive comparison and analysis of non-inverting buck boost and conventional buck boost converters
title_fullStr Comprehensive comparison and analysis of non-inverting buck boost and conventional buck boost converters
title_full_unstemmed Comprehensive comparison and analysis of non-inverting buck boost and conventional buck boost converters
title_sort comprehensive comparison and analysis of non-inverting buck boost and conventional buck boost converters
publisher Wiley
series The Journal of Engineering
issn 2051-3305
publishDate 2019-02-01
description The non-inverting buck boost (NIBB) converter has attracted significant attention in recent years, as it shares ground between input and output, and the voltage stress of switches is lower. In order to investigate the differences between NIBB and conventional buck boost converters, a comprehensive comparison and analysis of these two converters were conducted in terms of their operation principles, which includes multi-mode control strategy and dual-edge modulation here, and also the characteristics of switches and passive components in the two converters were analysed. The results show that NIBB is better than conventional buck boost circuit in these aspects of electrical stress, power loss, cost, passive component volume, and so on. Two prototypes for the two converters with 10 kW/20 kHz were designed and simulated, respectively, for verifying the results. Analytical and simulated results confirmed the conclusions.
topic switching convertors
DC-DC power convertors
conventional buck boost converters
conventional buck boost circuit
noninverting buck boost converter
NIBB converters
voltage stress
multimode control
dual-edge modulation
passive components
electrical stress
passive component volume
power 10.0 kW
frequency 20.0 kHz
url https://digital-library.theiet.org/content/journals/10.1049/joe.2018.8373
work_keys_str_mv AT xingweng comprehensivecomparisonandanalysisofnoninvertingbuckboostandconventionalbuckboostconverters
AT xiangxiao comprehensivecomparisonandanalysisofnoninvertingbuckboostandconventionalbuckboostconverters
AT weibinhe comprehensivecomparisonandanalysisofnoninvertingbuckboostandconventionalbuckboostconverters
AT yongyanzhou comprehensivecomparisonandanalysisofnoninvertingbuckboostandconventionalbuckboostconverters
AT yushen comprehensivecomparisonandanalysisofnoninvertingbuckboostandconventionalbuckboostconverters
AT weizhao comprehensivecomparisonandanalysisofnoninvertingbuckboostandconventionalbuckboostconverters
AT zhengmingzhao comprehensivecomparisonandanalysisofnoninvertingbuckboostandconventionalbuckboostconverters
_version_ 1724169160320090112