On the differences between Tinder™ versus online dating agencies: Questioning a myth. An exploratory study
Despite common stereotypes about those who use different types of online dating, psychological research on online dating agency users’ characteristics is actually very limited, and no scientific study has yet examined the individual characteristics of Tinder™ users. The current exploratory study aim...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Taylor & Francis Group
2016-12-01
|
Series: | Cogent Psychology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2016.1162414 |
id |
doaj-f5b39477c2804630b31e0cadc42fd275 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-f5b39477c2804630b31e0cadc42fd2752021-03-18T16:21:44ZengTaylor & Francis GroupCogent Psychology2331-19082016-12-013110.1080/23311908.2016.11624141162414On the differences between Tinder™ versus online dating agencies: Questioning a myth. An exploratory studyKaroline Gatter0Kathleen Hodkinson1Webster Vienna Private UniversityWebster Vienna Private UniversityDespite common stereotypes about those who use different types of online dating, psychological research on online dating agency users’ characteristics is actually very limited, and no scientific study has yet examined the individual characteristics of Tinder™ users. The current exploratory study aimed to investigate why individuals use these services, and how they differ in terms of sociability, self-esteem, and sexual permissiveness, with the aim of stimulating further research in the field. Participants (N = 75) were recruited over social media and completed questionnaires assessing motivation to use online dating, sociability, self-esteem, and sexual permissiveness. No differences were found in motivations, suggesting that people may use both Online Dating Agencies and Tinder™ for similar reasons. Tinder users in the current sample were younger than online dating agency users, which accounted for observed group differences in sexual permissiveness. There were no differences in self-esteem or sociability between the groups. Men were more likely than women to use both types of dating to find casual sex partners than women. Men also scored more highly on a measure of sexual permissiveness than women. These findings support previous research in indicating that users of both Tinder™ and Online Dating Agencies do not differ from the general population.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2016.1162414online datingonline dating agenciestinder™dating appsinternet userscharacteristicsmotivationspersonalityindividual differences |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Karoline Gatter Kathleen Hodkinson |
spellingShingle |
Karoline Gatter Kathleen Hodkinson On the differences between Tinder™ versus online dating agencies: Questioning a myth. An exploratory study Cogent Psychology online dating online dating agencies tinder™ dating apps internet users characteristics motivations personality individual differences |
author_facet |
Karoline Gatter Kathleen Hodkinson |
author_sort |
Karoline Gatter |
title |
On the differences between Tinder™ versus online dating agencies: Questioning a myth. An exploratory study |
title_short |
On the differences between Tinder™ versus online dating agencies: Questioning a myth. An exploratory study |
title_full |
On the differences between Tinder™ versus online dating agencies: Questioning a myth. An exploratory study |
title_fullStr |
On the differences between Tinder™ versus online dating agencies: Questioning a myth. An exploratory study |
title_full_unstemmed |
On the differences between Tinder™ versus online dating agencies: Questioning a myth. An exploratory study |
title_sort |
on the differences between tinder™ versus online dating agencies: questioning a myth. an exploratory study |
publisher |
Taylor & Francis Group |
series |
Cogent Psychology |
issn |
2331-1908 |
publishDate |
2016-12-01 |
description |
Despite common stereotypes about those who use different types of online dating, psychological research on online dating agency users’ characteristics is actually very limited, and no scientific study has yet examined the individual characteristics of Tinder™ users. The current exploratory study aimed to investigate why individuals use these services, and how they differ in terms of sociability, self-esteem, and sexual permissiveness, with the aim of stimulating further research in the field. Participants (N = 75) were recruited over social media and completed questionnaires assessing motivation to use online dating, sociability, self-esteem, and sexual permissiveness. No differences were found in motivations, suggesting that people may use both Online Dating Agencies and Tinder™ for similar reasons. Tinder users in the current sample were younger than online dating agency users, which accounted for observed group differences in sexual permissiveness. There were no differences in self-esteem or sociability between the groups. Men were more likely than women to use both types of dating to find casual sex partners than women. Men also scored more highly on a measure of sexual permissiveness than women. These findings support previous research in indicating that users of both Tinder™ and Online Dating Agencies do not differ from the general population. |
topic |
online dating online dating agencies tinder™ dating apps internet users characteristics motivations personality individual differences |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2016.1162414 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT karolinegatter onthedifferencesbetweentinderversusonlinedatingagenciesquestioningamythanexploratorystudy AT kathleenhodkinson onthedifferencesbetweentinderversusonlinedatingagenciesquestioningamythanexploratorystudy |
_version_ |
1724215418144423936 |