On the differences between Tinder™ versus online dating agencies: Questioning a myth. An exploratory study

Despite common stereotypes about those who use different types of online dating, psychological research on online dating agency users’ characteristics is actually very limited, and no scientific study has yet examined the individual characteristics of Tinder™ users. The current exploratory study aim...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Karoline Gatter, Kathleen Hodkinson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2016-12-01
Series:Cogent Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2016.1162414
id doaj-f5b39477c2804630b31e0cadc42fd275
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f5b39477c2804630b31e0cadc42fd2752021-03-18T16:21:44ZengTaylor & Francis GroupCogent Psychology2331-19082016-12-013110.1080/23311908.2016.11624141162414On the differences between Tinder™ versus online dating agencies: Questioning a myth. An exploratory studyKaroline Gatter0Kathleen Hodkinson1Webster Vienna Private UniversityWebster Vienna Private UniversityDespite common stereotypes about those who use different types of online dating, psychological research on online dating agency users’ characteristics is actually very limited, and no scientific study has yet examined the individual characteristics of Tinder™ users. The current exploratory study aimed to investigate why individuals use these services, and how they differ in terms of sociability, self-esteem, and sexual permissiveness, with the aim of stimulating further research in the field. Participants (N = 75) were recruited over social media and completed questionnaires assessing motivation to use online dating, sociability, self-esteem, and sexual permissiveness. No differences were found in motivations, suggesting that people may use both Online Dating Agencies and Tinder™ for similar reasons. Tinder users in the current sample were younger than online dating agency users, which accounted for observed group differences in sexual permissiveness. There were no differences in self-esteem or sociability between the groups. Men were more likely than women to use both types of dating to find casual sex partners than women. Men also scored more highly on a measure of sexual permissiveness than women. These findings support previous research in indicating that users of both Tinder™ and Online Dating Agencies do not differ from the general population.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2016.1162414online datingonline dating agenciestinder™dating appsinternet userscharacteristicsmotivationspersonalityindividual differences
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Karoline Gatter
Kathleen Hodkinson
spellingShingle Karoline Gatter
Kathleen Hodkinson
On the differences between Tinder™ versus online dating agencies: Questioning a myth. An exploratory study
Cogent Psychology
online dating
online dating agencies
tinder™
dating apps
internet users
characteristics
motivations
personality
individual differences
author_facet Karoline Gatter
Kathleen Hodkinson
author_sort Karoline Gatter
title On the differences between Tinder™ versus online dating agencies: Questioning a myth. An exploratory study
title_short On the differences between Tinder™ versus online dating agencies: Questioning a myth. An exploratory study
title_full On the differences between Tinder™ versus online dating agencies: Questioning a myth. An exploratory study
title_fullStr On the differences between Tinder™ versus online dating agencies: Questioning a myth. An exploratory study
title_full_unstemmed On the differences between Tinder™ versus online dating agencies: Questioning a myth. An exploratory study
title_sort on the differences between tinder™ versus online dating agencies: questioning a myth. an exploratory study
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Cogent Psychology
issn 2331-1908
publishDate 2016-12-01
description Despite common stereotypes about those who use different types of online dating, psychological research on online dating agency users’ characteristics is actually very limited, and no scientific study has yet examined the individual characteristics of Tinder™ users. The current exploratory study aimed to investigate why individuals use these services, and how they differ in terms of sociability, self-esteem, and sexual permissiveness, with the aim of stimulating further research in the field. Participants (N = 75) were recruited over social media and completed questionnaires assessing motivation to use online dating, sociability, self-esteem, and sexual permissiveness. No differences were found in motivations, suggesting that people may use both Online Dating Agencies and Tinder™ for similar reasons. Tinder users in the current sample were younger than online dating agency users, which accounted for observed group differences in sexual permissiveness. There were no differences in self-esteem or sociability between the groups. Men were more likely than women to use both types of dating to find casual sex partners than women. Men also scored more highly on a measure of sexual permissiveness than women. These findings support previous research in indicating that users of both Tinder™ and Online Dating Agencies do not differ from the general population.
topic online dating
online dating agencies
tinder™
dating apps
internet users
characteristics
motivations
personality
individual differences
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2016.1162414
work_keys_str_mv AT karolinegatter onthedifferencesbetweentinderversusonlinedatingagenciesquestioningamythanexploratorystudy
AT kathleenhodkinson onthedifferencesbetweentinderversusonlinedatingagenciesquestioningamythanexploratorystudy
_version_ 1724215418144423936