The Conundrum of Poor Ovarian Response: From Diagnosis to Treatment

Despite recent striking advances in assisted reproductive technology (ART), poor ovarian response (POR) diagnosis and treatment is still considered challenging. Poor responders constitute a heterogeneous cohort with the common denominator of under-responding to controlled ovarian stimulation. Inevit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Polina Giannelou, Mara Simopoulou, Sokratis Grigoriadis, Evangelos Makrakis, Adamantia Kontogeorgi, Agni Pantou, Dionysios Galatis, Theodoros Kalampokas, Panagiotis Bakas, Stamatis Bolaris, Konstantinos Pantos, Konstantinos Sfakianoudis
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-09-01
Series:Diagnostics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/10/9/687
id doaj-f5c525782e534fb28cc4b7b9d34ec6ab
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f5c525782e534fb28cc4b7b9d34ec6ab2020-11-25T02:49:03ZengMDPI AGDiagnostics2075-44182020-09-011068768710.3390/diagnostics10090687The Conundrum of Poor Ovarian Response: From Diagnosis to TreatmentPolina Giannelou0Mara Simopoulou1Sokratis Grigoriadis2Evangelos Makrakis3Adamantia Kontogeorgi4Agni Pantou5Dionysios Galatis6Theodoros Kalampokas7Panagiotis Bakas8Stamatis Bolaris9Konstantinos Pantos10Konstantinos Sfakianoudis11Department of Physiology, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 75, Mikras Asias, 11527 Athens, GreeceDepartment of Physiology, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 75, Mikras Asias, 11527 Athens, GreeceDepartment of Physiology, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 75, Mikras Asias, 11527 Athens, GreeceThird Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Attikon Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 1, Rimini, 12462 Haidari-Athens, GreeceThird Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Attikon Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 1, Rimini, 12462 Haidari-Athens, GreeceCentre for Human Reproduction, Genesis Athens Clinic, 14–16, Papanikoli, 15232 Athens, GreeceDepartment of Physiology, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 75, Mikras Asias, 11527 Athens, GreeceSecond Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aretaieion Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 76, Vasilisis Sofias Avenue, 11528 Athens, GreeceSecond Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aretaieion Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 76, Vasilisis Sofias Avenue, 11528 Athens, GreeceAssisted Conception Unit, General-Maternity District Hospital “Elena Venizelou”, Elenas Venizelou Avenue, 11521 Athens, GreeceCentre for Human Reproduction, Genesis Athens Clinic, 14–16, Papanikoli, 15232 Athens, GreeceCentre for Human Reproduction, Genesis Athens Clinic, 14–16, Papanikoli, 15232 Athens, GreeceDespite recent striking advances in assisted reproductive technology (ART), poor ovarian response (POR) diagnosis and treatment is still considered challenging. Poor responders constitute a heterogeneous cohort with the common denominator of under-responding to controlled ovarian stimulation. Inevitably, respective success rates are significantly compromised. As POR pathophysiology entails the elusive factor of compromised ovarian function, both diagnosis and management fuel an ongoing heated debate depicted in the literature. From the criteria employed for diagnosis to the plethora of strategies and adjuvant therapies proposed, the conundrum of POR still puzzles the practitioner. What is more, novel treatment approaches from stem cell therapy and platelet-rich plasma intra-ovarian infusion to mitochondrial replacement therapy have emerged, albeit not claiming clinical routine status yet. The complex and time sensitive nature of this subgroup of infertile patients indicates the demand for a consensus on a horizontally accepted definition, diagnosis and subsequent effective treating strategy. This critical review analyzes the standing criteria employed in order to diagnose and aptly categorize POR patients, while it proceeds to critically evaluate current and novel strategies regarding their management. Discrepancies in diagnosis and respective implications are discussed, while the existing diversity in management options highlights the need for individualized management.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/10/9/687poor ovarian responsediagnosismanagementBologna criteriaPoseidon groupgonadotropin stimulation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Polina Giannelou
Mara Simopoulou
Sokratis Grigoriadis
Evangelos Makrakis
Adamantia Kontogeorgi
Agni Pantou
Dionysios Galatis
Theodoros Kalampokas
Panagiotis Bakas
Stamatis Bolaris
Konstantinos Pantos
Konstantinos Sfakianoudis
spellingShingle Polina Giannelou
Mara Simopoulou
Sokratis Grigoriadis
Evangelos Makrakis
Adamantia Kontogeorgi
Agni Pantou
Dionysios Galatis
Theodoros Kalampokas
Panagiotis Bakas
Stamatis Bolaris
Konstantinos Pantos
Konstantinos Sfakianoudis
The Conundrum of Poor Ovarian Response: From Diagnosis to Treatment
Diagnostics
poor ovarian response
diagnosis
management
Bologna criteria
Poseidon group
gonadotropin stimulation
author_facet Polina Giannelou
Mara Simopoulou
Sokratis Grigoriadis
Evangelos Makrakis
Adamantia Kontogeorgi
Agni Pantou
Dionysios Galatis
Theodoros Kalampokas
Panagiotis Bakas
Stamatis Bolaris
Konstantinos Pantos
Konstantinos Sfakianoudis
author_sort Polina Giannelou
title The Conundrum of Poor Ovarian Response: From Diagnosis to Treatment
title_short The Conundrum of Poor Ovarian Response: From Diagnosis to Treatment
title_full The Conundrum of Poor Ovarian Response: From Diagnosis to Treatment
title_fullStr The Conundrum of Poor Ovarian Response: From Diagnosis to Treatment
title_full_unstemmed The Conundrum of Poor Ovarian Response: From Diagnosis to Treatment
title_sort conundrum of poor ovarian response: from diagnosis to treatment
publisher MDPI AG
series Diagnostics
issn 2075-4418
publishDate 2020-09-01
description Despite recent striking advances in assisted reproductive technology (ART), poor ovarian response (POR) diagnosis and treatment is still considered challenging. Poor responders constitute a heterogeneous cohort with the common denominator of under-responding to controlled ovarian stimulation. Inevitably, respective success rates are significantly compromised. As POR pathophysiology entails the elusive factor of compromised ovarian function, both diagnosis and management fuel an ongoing heated debate depicted in the literature. From the criteria employed for diagnosis to the plethora of strategies and adjuvant therapies proposed, the conundrum of POR still puzzles the practitioner. What is more, novel treatment approaches from stem cell therapy and platelet-rich plasma intra-ovarian infusion to mitochondrial replacement therapy have emerged, albeit not claiming clinical routine status yet. The complex and time sensitive nature of this subgroup of infertile patients indicates the demand for a consensus on a horizontally accepted definition, diagnosis and subsequent effective treating strategy. This critical review analyzes the standing criteria employed in order to diagnose and aptly categorize POR patients, while it proceeds to critically evaluate current and novel strategies regarding their management. Discrepancies in diagnosis and respective implications are discussed, while the existing diversity in management options highlights the need for individualized management.
topic poor ovarian response
diagnosis
management
Bologna criteria
Poseidon group
gonadotropin stimulation
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/10/9/687
work_keys_str_mv AT polinagiannelou theconundrumofpoorovarianresponsefromdiagnosistotreatment
AT marasimopoulou theconundrumofpoorovarianresponsefromdiagnosistotreatment
AT sokratisgrigoriadis theconundrumofpoorovarianresponsefromdiagnosistotreatment
AT evangelosmakrakis theconundrumofpoorovarianresponsefromdiagnosistotreatment
AT adamantiakontogeorgi theconundrumofpoorovarianresponsefromdiagnosistotreatment
AT agnipantou theconundrumofpoorovarianresponsefromdiagnosistotreatment
AT dionysiosgalatis theconundrumofpoorovarianresponsefromdiagnosistotreatment
AT theodoroskalampokas theconundrumofpoorovarianresponsefromdiagnosistotreatment
AT panagiotisbakas theconundrumofpoorovarianresponsefromdiagnosistotreatment
AT stamatisbolaris theconundrumofpoorovarianresponsefromdiagnosistotreatment
AT konstantinospantos theconundrumofpoorovarianresponsefromdiagnosistotreatment
AT konstantinossfakianoudis theconundrumofpoorovarianresponsefromdiagnosistotreatment
AT polinagiannelou conundrumofpoorovarianresponsefromdiagnosistotreatment
AT marasimopoulou conundrumofpoorovarianresponsefromdiagnosistotreatment
AT sokratisgrigoriadis conundrumofpoorovarianresponsefromdiagnosistotreatment
AT evangelosmakrakis conundrumofpoorovarianresponsefromdiagnosistotreatment
AT adamantiakontogeorgi conundrumofpoorovarianresponsefromdiagnosistotreatment
AT agnipantou conundrumofpoorovarianresponsefromdiagnosistotreatment
AT dionysiosgalatis conundrumofpoorovarianresponsefromdiagnosistotreatment
AT theodoroskalampokas conundrumofpoorovarianresponsefromdiagnosistotreatment
AT panagiotisbakas conundrumofpoorovarianresponsefromdiagnosistotreatment
AT stamatisbolaris conundrumofpoorovarianresponsefromdiagnosistotreatment
AT konstantinospantos conundrumofpoorovarianresponsefromdiagnosistotreatment
AT konstantinossfakianoudis conundrumofpoorovarianresponsefromdiagnosistotreatment
_version_ 1724745069546700800