Children’s accounts of labelling and stigmatization in private schools in Delhi, India and the Right to Education Act

India’s Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 compels private schools to reserve a proportion of their seats for free for disadvantaged children. Although controversial, it is idealized as an equity measure for inclusion in and through education. This small-scale study, feedin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michael Lafleur, Prachi Srivastava
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Arizona State University 2019-10-01
Series:Education Policy Analysis Archives
Subjects:
Online Access:https://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/4377
id doaj-f5d9c9070e3e4532b21f31327a46e2e5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f5d9c9070e3e4532b21f31327a46e2e52020-11-25T03:35:36ZengArizona State UniversityEducation Policy Analysis Archives1068-23412019-10-0127010.14507/epaa.27.43771998Children’s accounts of labelling and stigmatization in private schools in Delhi, India and the Right to Education ActMichael Lafleur0Prachi Srivastava1University of GuelphUniversity of Western OntarioIndia’s Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 compels private schools to reserve a proportion of their seats for free for disadvantaged children. Although controversial, it is idealized as an equity measure for inclusion in and through education. This small-scale study, feeding into a larger research project, details children’s accounts of their everyday lived experiences at private schools in Delhi. Children reported labelling students by teachers as ‘naughty’ or academically ‘weak’ or ‘incapable’ as a pervasive practice. These ‘designated identities’ (Sfard Prusak, 2005) were reinforced by teachers and through peer interactions. They were internalized by participants about their peers and affected how they interacted with them. Peers who were labelled were reported to be stigmatized. Surprisingly, neither caste nor gender were mentioned as explicitly marking participant experiences. The paper also discusses the participatory methods employed in the study as a further contribution to the literature on private schooling. Data are from participatory ‘draw-and-talk’ sessions conducted with 16 children in 2015-16 from marginalized backgrounds, accessing six different private schools in one catchment area, half of whom secured a free private school seat. Participants were from amongst the first cohorts eligible for the free seats provision.https://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/4377exclusionprivate schoolsindiachildren’s experiencesparticipatory research
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Michael Lafleur
Prachi Srivastava
spellingShingle Michael Lafleur
Prachi Srivastava
Children’s accounts of labelling and stigmatization in private schools in Delhi, India and the Right to Education Act
Education Policy Analysis Archives
exclusion
private schools
india
children’s experiences
participatory research
author_facet Michael Lafleur
Prachi Srivastava
author_sort Michael Lafleur
title Children’s accounts of labelling and stigmatization in private schools in Delhi, India and the Right to Education Act
title_short Children’s accounts of labelling and stigmatization in private schools in Delhi, India and the Right to Education Act
title_full Children’s accounts of labelling and stigmatization in private schools in Delhi, India and the Right to Education Act
title_fullStr Children’s accounts of labelling and stigmatization in private schools in Delhi, India and the Right to Education Act
title_full_unstemmed Children’s accounts of labelling and stigmatization in private schools in Delhi, India and the Right to Education Act
title_sort children’s accounts of labelling and stigmatization in private schools in delhi, india and the right to education act
publisher Arizona State University
series Education Policy Analysis Archives
issn 1068-2341
publishDate 2019-10-01
description India’s Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 compels private schools to reserve a proportion of their seats for free for disadvantaged children. Although controversial, it is idealized as an equity measure for inclusion in and through education. This small-scale study, feeding into a larger research project, details children’s accounts of their everyday lived experiences at private schools in Delhi. Children reported labelling students by teachers as ‘naughty’ or academically ‘weak’ or ‘incapable’ as a pervasive practice. These ‘designated identities’ (Sfard Prusak, 2005) were reinforced by teachers and through peer interactions. They were internalized by participants about their peers and affected how they interacted with them. Peers who were labelled were reported to be stigmatized. Surprisingly, neither caste nor gender were mentioned as explicitly marking participant experiences. The paper also discusses the participatory methods employed in the study as a further contribution to the literature on private schooling. Data are from participatory ‘draw-and-talk’ sessions conducted with 16 children in 2015-16 from marginalized backgrounds, accessing six different private schools in one catchment area, half of whom secured a free private school seat. Participants were from amongst the first cohorts eligible for the free seats provision.
topic exclusion
private schools
india
children’s experiences
participatory research
url https://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/4377
work_keys_str_mv AT michaellafleur childrensaccountsoflabellingandstigmatizationinprivateschoolsindelhiindiaandtherighttoeducationact
AT prachisrivastava childrensaccountsoflabellingandstigmatizationinprivateschoolsindelhiindiaandtherighttoeducationact
_version_ 1724553465540116480