Exploring the construct validity of a scale for identifying antisocial personality disorder

Background: Antisocial personality features have important clinical and epidemiological implications. However, the construct validity of internal of the self-reported scale for antisocial personality disorder of the Structured Clinical Interview for Axis II Disoders of the Diagnostic and Statistical...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Adalberto Campo-Arias
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: Universidad Autonoma de Bucaramanga 2006-12-01
Series:Medunab
Subjects:
Online Access:http://caribdis.unab.edu.co/pls/portal/docs/PAGE/REVISTAMEDUNAB/PERSONALIDAD%20ANTISOCIAL.PDF
id doaj-f5e6b10539e64ea6a4ff926951258a91
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f5e6b10539e64ea6a4ff926951258a912020-11-25T02:04:57ZspaUniversidad Autonoma de BucaramangaMedunab0123-70472006-12-0193206210Exploring the construct validity of a scale for identifying antisocial personality disorderAdalberto Campo-AriasBackground: Antisocial personality features have important clinical and epidemiological implications. However, the construct validity of internal of the self-reported scale for antisocial personality disorder of the Structured Clinical Interview for Axis II Disoders of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorder (DSM-IV) of the American Psychiatric Asociation(SCID-II). Objective: To explore the construct validity of of the self-rated questionnaire of the SCID-II for antisocial personality disorder in female and male adults from the general population of Bucaramanga, Colombia. Method: A validation study, without a gold standard, was designed to explore the construct validity of the scale for antisocial personality disorder of the SCID-II. A probabilistic sample of 2,496 18- to 65-year adults resident in the urban area of Bucaramanga, Colombia, completed the questionnaire for antisocial personality disorder of the SCID-II. The mean age of participants was 38.0 years (SD = 13.5); 69.7% were women; the mean formal scholarship was 9.2 years (SD = 4.1); 49.1% were workers; 58.1% had a stable marital relationship; and 67.8% were living in middle-class neighbourhoods. The scale for for antisocial personality disorder of the SCID-II has 15 questions with dichotomycal answers. To explore the construct validity of the component principal factor analysis was computed. Results: In the total población four factors were extrated that accounted for 47.7% of the variance; among females, five salient factors were identified that explained 52.2% of the variance; and among males, four factor were extracted responsible for 50.2 of the variance. Conclusions: The scale for antisocial personality disorder of the SCID-II exhibits a differential factor solution for men and for women.http://caribdis.unab.edu.co/pls/portal/docs/PAGE/REVISTAMEDUNAB/PERSONALIDAD%20ANTISOCIAL.PDFPersonality disordersgeneral populationadultconstruct validityvalidation studies
collection DOAJ
language Spanish
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Adalberto Campo-Arias
spellingShingle Adalberto Campo-Arias
Exploring the construct validity of a scale for identifying antisocial personality disorder
Medunab
Personality disorders
general population
adult
construct validity
validation studies
author_facet Adalberto Campo-Arias
author_sort Adalberto Campo-Arias
title Exploring the construct validity of a scale for identifying antisocial personality disorder
title_short Exploring the construct validity of a scale for identifying antisocial personality disorder
title_full Exploring the construct validity of a scale for identifying antisocial personality disorder
title_fullStr Exploring the construct validity of a scale for identifying antisocial personality disorder
title_full_unstemmed Exploring the construct validity of a scale for identifying antisocial personality disorder
title_sort exploring the construct validity of a scale for identifying antisocial personality disorder
publisher Universidad Autonoma de Bucaramanga
series Medunab
issn 0123-7047
publishDate 2006-12-01
description Background: Antisocial personality features have important clinical and epidemiological implications. However, the construct validity of internal of the self-reported scale for antisocial personality disorder of the Structured Clinical Interview for Axis II Disoders of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorder (DSM-IV) of the American Psychiatric Asociation(SCID-II). Objective: To explore the construct validity of of the self-rated questionnaire of the SCID-II for antisocial personality disorder in female and male adults from the general population of Bucaramanga, Colombia. Method: A validation study, without a gold standard, was designed to explore the construct validity of the scale for antisocial personality disorder of the SCID-II. A probabilistic sample of 2,496 18- to 65-year adults resident in the urban area of Bucaramanga, Colombia, completed the questionnaire for antisocial personality disorder of the SCID-II. The mean age of participants was 38.0 years (SD = 13.5); 69.7% were women; the mean formal scholarship was 9.2 years (SD = 4.1); 49.1% were workers; 58.1% had a stable marital relationship; and 67.8% were living in middle-class neighbourhoods. The scale for for antisocial personality disorder of the SCID-II has 15 questions with dichotomycal answers. To explore the construct validity of the component principal factor analysis was computed. Results: In the total población four factors were extrated that accounted for 47.7% of the variance; among females, five salient factors were identified that explained 52.2% of the variance; and among males, four factor were extracted responsible for 50.2 of the variance. Conclusions: The scale for antisocial personality disorder of the SCID-II exhibits a differential factor solution for men and for women.
topic Personality disorders
general population
adult
construct validity
validation studies
url http://caribdis.unab.edu.co/pls/portal/docs/PAGE/REVISTAMEDUNAB/PERSONALIDAD%20ANTISOCIAL.PDF
work_keys_str_mv AT adalbertocampoarias exploringtheconstructvalidityofascaleforidentifyingantisocialpersonalitydisorder
_version_ 1715578124588023808