3.1. Intenzionalità e documentalità
On the basis of a critique of the notion of collective intentionality employed by John Searle to explain social reality, the article argues Searle’s constitutive rule that, for social objects “X counts as Y in C” raises more problems than it solves. Searle was perfectly right to say that Derrida’s f...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Rosenberg & Sellier
2012-04-01
|
| Series: | Rivista di Estetica |
| Online Access: | http://journals.openedition.org/estetica/1706 |
| id |
doaj-f5f3e7abd73d41e8a34ca273022a6f94 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
Article |
| spelling |
doaj-f5f3e7abd73d41e8a34ca273022a6f942020-11-25T02:44:49ZengRosenberg & SellierRivista di Estetica0035-62122421-58642012-04-014916118210.4000/estetica.17063.1. Intenzionalità e documentalitàMaurizio FerrarisOn the basis of a critique of the notion of collective intentionality employed by John Searle to explain social reality, the article argues Searle’s constitutive rule that, for social objects “X counts as Y in C” raises more problems than it solves. Searle was perfectly right to say that Derrida’s formula “there is nothing outside the text” is false. But we can vindicate (and emend) Derrida by saying “ there is nothing social outside the text”: social objects are identified with the inscrbed acts that give rise to them.http://journals.openedition.org/estetica/1706 |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| language |
English |
| format |
Article |
| sources |
DOAJ |
| author |
Maurizio Ferraris |
| spellingShingle |
Maurizio Ferraris 3.1. Intenzionalità e documentalità Rivista di Estetica |
| author_facet |
Maurizio Ferraris |
| author_sort |
Maurizio Ferraris |
| title |
3.1. Intenzionalità e documentalità |
| title_short |
3.1. Intenzionalità e documentalità |
| title_full |
3.1. Intenzionalità e documentalità |
| title_fullStr |
3.1. Intenzionalità e documentalità |
| title_full_unstemmed |
3.1. Intenzionalità e documentalità |
| title_sort |
3.1. intenzionalità e documentalità |
| publisher |
Rosenberg & Sellier |
| series |
Rivista di Estetica |
| issn |
0035-6212 2421-5864 |
| publishDate |
2012-04-01 |
| description |
On the basis of a critique of the notion of collective intentionality employed by John Searle to explain social reality, the article argues Searle’s constitutive rule that, for social objects “X counts as Y in C” raises more problems than it solves. Searle was perfectly right to say that Derrida’s formula “there is nothing outside the text” is false. But we can vindicate (and emend) Derrida by saying “ there is nothing social outside the text”: social objects are identified with the inscrbed acts that give rise to them. |
| url |
http://journals.openedition.org/estetica/1706 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT maurizioferraris 31intenzionalitaedocumentalita |
| _version_ |
1724765799887929344 |