Use of Google Scholar public profiles in orthopedics

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to survey the growth of Google Scholar public profiles in orthopedics over a 12-month period and to investigate global patterns. Methods: Data was prospectively acquired from June 2013 to June 2014. Google Scholar queries specific to orthopedic surgery wer...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kevin Tetsworth, Dave Fraser, Vaida Glatt, Erik Hohmann
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2017-02-01
Series:Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499017690322
id doaj-f6249e5c54bb4db1b376b09515cde27b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f6249e5c54bb4db1b376b09515cde27b2020-11-25T03:32:43ZengSAGE PublishingJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery2309-49902017-02-012510.1177/2309499017690322Use of Google Scholar public profiles in orthopedicsKevin Tetsworth0Dave Fraser1Vaida Glatt2Erik Hohmann3 Orthopaedic Research Centre of Australia (ORCA), Brisbane, Australia Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Brisbane, Australia University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas, USA Valiant Clinic/Houston Methodist Group, Dubai, United Arab EmiratesIntroduction: The purpose of this study was to survey the growth of Google Scholar public profiles in orthopedics over a 12-month period and to investigate global patterns. Methods: Data was prospectively acquired from June 2013 to June 2014. Google Scholar queries specific to orthopedic surgery were performed at 90-day intervals. Demographic aspects of each user were also compiled, including gender, current location, and primary interests. To determine differences between the growth of Google Scholar public profile registrations and citation counts, as well as differences in growth in different regions, repeated measures of analysis of variance (RMANOVA) were used. Results: RMANOVA revealed statistically significant differences ( p = 0.0001) for regional growth. The largest growth was observed in the United Kingdom ( p = 0.009, 289%), followed by the Asia-Pacific region ( p = 0.004, 177%) and “Other” ( p = 0.006, 172%). The mean growth per 90-day interval is 19.9% ( p = 0.003) and the mean 12-month growth is 107% ( p = 0.05). Statistically significant differences between gender (male vs. female) and basic and clinical sciences ( χ 2 = 22.4, p = 0.0001) were observed. Conclusion: This study suggests an exponential growth in the number of authors in the field of orthopedic surgery creating a Google Scholar public profile, and at the current rate participation doubles every 10.6 months.https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499017690322
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kevin Tetsworth
Dave Fraser
Vaida Glatt
Erik Hohmann
spellingShingle Kevin Tetsworth
Dave Fraser
Vaida Glatt
Erik Hohmann
Use of Google Scholar public profiles in orthopedics
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
author_facet Kevin Tetsworth
Dave Fraser
Vaida Glatt
Erik Hohmann
author_sort Kevin Tetsworth
title Use of Google Scholar public profiles in orthopedics
title_short Use of Google Scholar public profiles in orthopedics
title_full Use of Google Scholar public profiles in orthopedics
title_fullStr Use of Google Scholar public profiles in orthopedics
title_full_unstemmed Use of Google Scholar public profiles in orthopedics
title_sort use of google scholar public profiles in orthopedics
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
issn 2309-4990
publishDate 2017-02-01
description Introduction: The purpose of this study was to survey the growth of Google Scholar public profiles in orthopedics over a 12-month period and to investigate global patterns. Methods: Data was prospectively acquired from June 2013 to June 2014. Google Scholar queries specific to orthopedic surgery were performed at 90-day intervals. Demographic aspects of each user were also compiled, including gender, current location, and primary interests. To determine differences between the growth of Google Scholar public profile registrations and citation counts, as well as differences in growth in different regions, repeated measures of analysis of variance (RMANOVA) were used. Results: RMANOVA revealed statistically significant differences ( p = 0.0001) for regional growth. The largest growth was observed in the United Kingdom ( p = 0.009, 289%), followed by the Asia-Pacific region ( p = 0.004, 177%) and “Other” ( p = 0.006, 172%). The mean growth per 90-day interval is 19.9% ( p = 0.003) and the mean 12-month growth is 107% ( p = 0.05). Statistically significant differences between gender (male vs. female) and basic and clinical sciences ( χ 2 = 22.4, p = 0.0001) were observed. Conclusion: This study suggests an exponential growth in the number of authors in the field of orthopedic surgery creating a Google Scholar public profile, and at the current rate participation doubles every 10.6 months.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499017690322
work_keys_str_mv AT kevintetsworth useofgooglescholarpublicprofilesinorthopedics
AT davefraser useofgooglescholarpublicprofilesinorthopedics
AT vaidaglatt useofgooglescholarpublicprofilesinorthopedics
AT erikhohmann useofgooglescholarpublicprofilesinorthopedics
_version_ 1724566361452052480