Two dynamic regimes in the human gut microbiome.

The gut microbiome is a dynamic system that changes with host development, health, behavior, diet, and microbe-microbe interactions. Prior work on gut microbial time series has largely focused on autoregressive models (e.g. Lotka-Volterra). However, we show that most of the variance in microbial tim...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sean M Gibbons, Sean M Kearney, Chris S Smillie, Eric J Alm
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2017-02-01
Series:PLoS Computational Biology
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5340412?pdf=render
id doaj-f626c994de514c819ffd340f8a1d8fda
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f626c994de514c819ffd340f8a1d8fda2020-11-25T01:34:03ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS Computational Biology1553-734X1553-73582017-02-01132e100536410.1371/journal.pcbi.1005364Two dynamic regimes in the human gut microbiome.Sean M GibbonsSean M KearneyChris S SmillieEric J AlmThe gut microbiome is a dynamic system that changes with host development, health, behavior, diet, and microbe-microbe interactions. Prior work on gut microbial time series has largely focused on autoregressive models (e.g. Lotka-Volterra). However, we show that most of the variance in microbial time series is non-autoregressive. In addition, we show how community state-clustering is flawed when it comes to characterizing within-host dynamics and that more continuous methods are required. Most organisms exhibited stable, mean-reverting behavior suggestive of fixed carrying capacities and abundant taxa were largely shared across individuals. This mean-reverting behavior allowed us to apply sparse vector autoregression (sVAR)-a multivariate method developed for econometrics-to model the autoregressive component of gut community dynamics. We find a strong phylogenetic signal in the non-autoregressive co-variance from our sVAR model residuals, which suggests niche filtering. We show how changes in diet are also non-autoregressive and that Operational Taxonomic Units strongly correlated with dietary variables have much less of an autoregressive component to their variance, which suggests that diet is a major driver of microbial dynamics. Autoregressive variance appears to be driven by multi-day recovery from frequent facultative anaerobe blooms, which may be driven by fluctuations in luminal redox. Overall, we identify two dynamic regimes within the human gut microbiota: one likely driven by external environmental fluctuations, and the other by internal processes.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5340412?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sean M Gibbons
Sean M Kearney
Chris S Smillie
Eric J Alm
spellingShingle Sean M Gibbons
Sean M Kearney
Chris S Smillie
Eric J Alm
Two dynamic regimes in the human gut microbiome.
PLoS Computational Biology
author_facet Sean M Gibbons
Sean M Kearney
Chris S Smillie
Eric J Alm
author_sort Sean M Gibbons
title Two dynamic regimes in the human gut microbiome.
title_short Two dynamic regimes in the human gut microbiome.
title_full Two dynamic regimes in the human gut microbiome.
title_fullStr Two dynamic regimes in the human gut microbiome.
title_full_unstemmed Two dynamic regimes in the human gut microbiome.
title_sort two dynamic regimes in the human gut microbiome.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS Computational Biology
issn 1553-734X
1553-7358
publishDate 2017-02-01
description The gut microbiome is a dynamic system that changes with host development, health, behavior, diet, and microbe-microbe interactions. Prior work on gut microbial time series has largely focused on autoregressive models (e.g. Lotka-Volterra). However, we show that most of the variance in microbial time series is non-autoregressive. In addition, we show how community state-clustering is flawed when it comes to characterizing within-host dynamics and that more continuous methods are required. Most organisms exhibited stable, mean-reverting behavior suggestive of fixed carrying capacities and abundant taxa were largely shared across individuals. This mean-reverting behavior allowed us to apply sparse vector autoregression (sVAR)-a multivariate method developed for econometrics-to model the autoregressive component of gut community dynamics. We find a strong phylogenetic signal in the non-autoregressive co-variance from our sVAR model residuals, which suggests niche filtering. We show how changes in diet are also non-autoregressive and that Operational Taxonomic Units strongly correlated with dietary variables have much less of an autoregressive component to their variance, which suggests that diet is a major driver of microbial dynamics. Autoregressive variance appears to be driven by multi-day recovery from frequent facultative anaerobe blooms, which may be driven by fluctuations in luminal redox. Overall, we identify two dynamic regimes within the human gut microbiota: one likely driven by external environmental fluctuations, and the other by internal processes.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5340412?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT seanmgibbons twodynamicregimesinthehumangutmicrobiome
AT seanmkearney twodynamicregimesinthehumangutmicrobiome
AT chrisssmillie twodynamicregimesinthehumangutmicrobiome
AT ericjalm twodynamicregimesinthehumangutmicrobiome
_version_ 1725073967548465152