2.5 NON-INVASIVE WAVE INTENSITY ANALYSIS IN THE AORTA AND INTERNAL CAROTID USING PHASE-CONTRAST MR ANGIOGRAPHY: THE EFFECT OF HYPERTENSION

Introduction: Hypertension is associated with stiffening of blood vessels, reduced arterial lumen and reduced cerebral blood flow; however, it is not known how lower cerebral blood flow relates to arterial structure or impacts on wave dynamics. We hypothesise increased backward wave energy and faste...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sandra Neumann, Mark Hamilton, Julian Paton, Angus Nightingale, Jonathan Brooks, Emma Hart, Giovanni Biglino
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Atlantis Press 2017-12-01
Series:Artery Research
Online Access:https://www.atlantis-press.com/article/125930210/view
id doaj-f64286cc4f5a451796386153a339d9f6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f64286cc4f5a451796386153a339d9f62020-11-25T03:43:03ZengAtlantis PressArtery Research 1876-44012017-12-012010.1016/j.artres.2017.10.0272.5 NON-INVASIVE WAVE INTENSITY ANALYSIS IN THE AORTA AND INTERNAL CAROTID USING PHASE-CONTRAST MR ANGIOGRAPHY: THE EFFECT OF HYPERTENSIONSandra NeumannMark HamiltonJulian PatonAngus NightingaleJonathan BrooksEmma HartGiovanni BiglinoIntroduction: Hypertension is associated with stiffening of blood vessels, reduced arterial lumen and reduced cerebral blood flow; however, it is not known how lower cerebral blood flow relates to arterial structure or impacts on wave dynamics. We hypothesise increased backward wave energy and faster wave speed in the hypertensive internal carotid artery as an indication of increased resistance to flow. Methods: Normotensive, controlled and uncontrolled hypertensive participants were recruited (daytime ambulatory BP < 135/85 mmHg and >135/85 mmHg, respectively; n = 11 per group). Wave intensity analysis was performed on left internal carotid and ascending aorta phase-contrast magnetic resonance angiography. Results: While ascending aortic wave speed increased significantly in the uncontrolled hypertensive compared to normotensive (p < 0.001) and controlled hypertensive participants (p = 0.038), no significant difference was observed in the internal carotid. Carotid forward and backward wave intensity increased in uncontrolled hypertensives compared to normotensives (p = 0.036 and p = 0.033, respectively), and backward wave energy increased in the controlled hypertensives compared to normotensives (p = 0.041). There was no significant difference between uncontrolled and controlled hypertensives. Figure 1Analysis of the phase contrast MR angiography data. A) Magnitude image B) Phase image of the internal carotid arteries C) Magnitude image and D) Phase image of the ascending aorta E) example of log(Area)-Velocity loop. Red line indicates the slope from which wave speed is calculated in early systole F) Example of the wave Intensity components, where blue is the forward wave energy, red is the backward wave energy and black is the net wave intensity. Conclusion: Wave intensity in the internal carotid artery is altered in uncontrolled hypertension. This is partly rescued when blood pressure is controlled by medication, although greater backward wave energy persists. This supports the hypothesis of increased resistance to flow in the cerebral circulation of the hypertensives. Whilst increased aortic wave speed confirmed an expected increase in stiffness, this was not observed in the internal carotid. This might suggest a protective mechanism in the cerebral circulation, in conjunction with the effect of vessel tortuosity.https://www.atlantis-press.com/article/125930210/view
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sandra Neumann
Mark Hamilton
Julian Paton
Angus Nightingale
Jonathan Brooks
Emma Hart
Giovanni Biglino
spellingShingle Sandra Neumann
Mark Hamilton
Julian Paton
Angus Nightingale
Jonathan Brooks
Emma Hart
Giovanni Biglino
2.5 NON-INVASIVE WAVE INTENSITY ANALYSIS IN THE AORTA AND INTERNAL CAROTID USING PHASE-CONTRAST MR ANGIOGRAPHY: THE EFFECT OF HYPERTENSION
Artery Research
author_facet Sandra Neumann
Mark Hamilton
Julian Paton
Angus Nightingale
Jonathan Brooks
Emma Hart
Giovanni Biglino
author_sort Sandra Neumann
title 2.5 NON-INVASIVE WAVE INTENSITY ANALYSIS IN THE AORTA AND INTERNAL CAROTID USING PHASE-CONTRAST MR ANGIOGRAPHY: THE EFFECT OF HYPERTENSION
title_short 2.5 NON-INVASIVE WAVE INTENSITY ANALYSIS IN THE AORTA AND INTERNAL CAROTID USING PHASE-CONTRAST MR ANGIOGRAPHY: THE EFFECT OF HYPERTENSION
title_full 2.5 NON-INVASIVE WAVE INTENSITY ANALYSIS IN THE AORTA AND INTERNAL CAROTID USING PHASE-CONTRAST MR ANGIOGRAPHY: THE EFFECT OF HYPERTENSION
title_fullStr 2.5 NON-INVASIVE WAVE INTENSITY ANALYSIS IN THE AORTA AND INTERNAL CAROTID USING PHASE-CONTRAST MR ANGIOGRAPHY: THE EFFECT OF HYPERTENSION
title_full_unstemmed 2.5 NON-INVASIVE WAVE INTENSITY ANALYSIS IN THE AORTA AND INTERNAL CAROTID USING PHASE-CONTRAST MR ANGIOGRAPHY: THE EFFECT OF HYPERTENSION
title_sort 2.5 non-invasive wave intensity analysis in the aorta and internal carotid using phase-contrast mr angiography: the effect of hypertension
publisher Atlantis Press
series Artery Research
issn 1876-4401
publishDate 2017-12-01
description Introduction: Hypertension is associated with stiffening of blood vessels, reduced arterial lumen and reduced cerebral blood flow; however, it is not known how lower cerebral blood flow relates to arterial structure or impacts on wave dynamics. We hypothesise increased backward wave energy and faster wave speed in the hypertensive internal carotid artery as an indication of increased resistance to flow. Methods: Normotensive, controlled and uncontrolled hypertensive participants were recruited (daytime ambulatory BP < 135/85 mmHg and >135/85 mmHg, respectively; n = 11 per group). Wave intensity analysis was performed on left internal carotid and ascending aorta phase-contrast magnetic resonance angiography. Results: While ascending aortic wave speed increased significantly in the uncontrolled hypertensive compared to normotensive (p < 0.001) and controlled hypertensive participants (p = 0.038), no significant difference was observed in the internal carotid. Carotid forward and backward wave intensity increased in uncontrolled hypertensives compared to normotensives (p = 0.036 and p = 0.033, respectively), and backward wave energy increased in the controlled hypertensives compared to normotensives (p = 0.041). There was no significant difference between uncontrolled and controlled hypertensives. Figure 1Analysis of the phase contrast MR angiography data. A) Magnitude image B) Phase image of the internal carotid arteries C) Magnitude image and D) Phase image of the ascending aorta E) example of log(Area)-Velocity loop. Red line indicates the slope from which wave speed is calculated in early systole F) Example of the wave Intensity components, where blue is the forward wave energy, red is the backward wave energy and black is the net wave intensity. Conclusion: Wave intensity in the internal carotid artery is altered in uncontrolled hypertension. This is partly rescued when blood pressure is controlled by medication, although greater backward wave energy persists. This supports the hypothesis of increased resistance to flow in the cerebral circulation of the hypertensives. Whilst increased aortic wave speed confirmed an expected increase in stiffness, this was not observed in the internal carotid. This might suggest a protective mechanism in the cerebral circulation, in conjunction with the effect of vessel tortuosity.
url https://www.atlantis-press.com/article/125930210/view
work_keys_str_mv AT sandraneumann 25noninvasivewaveintensityanalysisintheaortaandinternalcarotidusingphasecontrastmrangiographytheeffectofhypertension
AT markhamilton 25noninvasivewaveintensityanalysisintheaortaandinternalcarotidusingphasecontrastmrangiographytheeffectofhypertension
AT julianpaton 25noninvasivewaveintensityanalysisintheaortaandinternalcarotidusingphasecontrastmrangiographytheeffectofhypertension
AT angusnightingale 25noninvasivewaveintensityanalysisintheaortaandinternalcarotidusingphasecontrastmrangiographytheeffectofhypertension
AT jonathanbrooks 25noninvasivewaveintensityanalysisintheaortaandinternalcarotidusingphasecontrastmrangiographytheeffectofhypertension
AT emmahart 25noninvasivewaveintensityanalysisintheaortaandinternalcarotidusingphasecontrastmrangiographytheeffectofhypertension
AT giovannibiglino 25noninvasivewaveintensityanalysisintheaortaandinternalcarotidusingphasecontrastmrangiographytheeffectofhypertension
_version_ 1724521649594695680