Evolutionary origin of regulatory regions of retrogenes in <it>Drosophila</it>

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Retrogenes are processed copies of other genes. This duplication mechanism produces a copy of the parental gene that should not contain introns, and usually does not contain cis-regulatory regions. Here, we computationally address th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Casola Claudio, Bai Yongsheng, Betrán Esther
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2008-05-01
Series:BMC Genomics
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2164/9/241
id doaj-f642c92ce45640b7a0ed6bd111b17225
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f642c92ce45640b7a0ed6bd111b172252020-11-24T23:39:30ZengBMCBMC Genomics1471-21642008-05-019124110.1186/1471-2164-9-241Evolutionary origin of regulatory regions of retrogenes in <it>Drosophila</it>Casola ClaudioBai YongshengBetrán Esther<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Retrogenes are processed copies of other genes. This duplication mechanism produces a copy of the parental gene that should not contain introns, and usually does not contain cis-regulatory regions. Here, we computationally address the evolutionary origin of promoter and other cis-regulatory regions in retrogenes using a total of 94 <it>Drosophila </it>retroposition events we recently identified. Previous tissue expression data has revealed that a large fraction of these retrogenes are specifically and/or highly expressed in adult testes of <it>Drosophila</it>.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>In this work, we infer that retrogenes do not generally carry regulatory regions from aberrant upstream or normal transcripts of their parental genes, and that expression patterns of neighboring genes are not consistently shared by retrogenes. Additionally, transposable elements do not appear to substantially provide regulatory regions to retrogenes. Interestingly, we find that there is an excess of retrogenes in male testis neighborhoods that is not explained by insertional biases of the retroelement machinery used for retroposition.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>We conclude that retrogenes' regulatory regions mostly do not represent a random set of existing regulatory regions. On the contrary, our conclusion is that selection is likely to have played an important role in the persistence of autosomal testis biased retrogenes. Selection in favor of retrogenes inserted in male testis neighborhoods and at the sequence level to produce testis expression is postulated to have occurred.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2164/9/241
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Casola Claudio
Bai Yongsheng
Betrán Esther
spellingShingle Casola Claudio
Bai Yongsheng
Betrán Esther
Evolutionary origin of regulatory regions of retrogenes in <it>Drosophila</it>
BMC Genomics
author_facet Casola Claudio
Bai Yongsheng
Betrán Esther
author_sort Casola Claudio
title Evolutionary origin of regulatory regions of retrogenes in <it>Drosophila</it>
title_short Evolutionary origin of regulatory regions of retrogenes in <it>Drosophila</it>
title_full Evolutionary origin of regulatory regions of retrogenes in <it>Drosophila</it>
title_fullStr Evolutionary origin of regulatory regions of retrogenes in <it>Drosophila</it>
title_full_unstemmed Evolutionary origin of regulatory regions of retrogenes in <it>Drosophila</it>
title_sort evolutionary origin of regulatory regions of retrogenes in <it>drosophila</it>
publisher BMC
series BMC Genomics
issn 1471-2164
publishDate 2008-05-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Retrogenes are processed copies of other genes. This duplication mechanism produces a copy of the parental gene that should not contain introns, and usually does not contain cis-regulatory regions. Here, we computationally address the evolutionary origin of promoter and other cis-regulatory regions in retrogenes using a total of 94 <it>Drosophila </it>retroposition events we recently identified. Previous tissue expression data has revealed that a large fraction of these retrogenes are specifically and/or highly expressed in adult testes of <it>Drosophila</it>.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>In this work, we infer that retrogenes do not generally carry regulatory regions from aberrant upstream or normal transcripts of their parental genes, and that expression patterns of neighboring genes are not consistently shared by retrogenes. Additionally, transposable elements do not appear to substantially provide regulatory regions to retrogenes. Interestingly, we find that there is an excess of retrogenes in male testis neighborhoods that is not explained by insertional biases of the retroelement machinery used for retroposition.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>We conclude that retrogenes' regulatory regions mostly do not represent a random set of existing regulatory regions. On the contrary, our conclusion is that selection is likely to have played an important role in the persistence of autosomal testis biased retrogenes. Selection in favor of retrogenes inserted in male testis neighborhoods and at the sequence level to produce testis expression is postulated to have occurred.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2164/9/241
work_keys_str_mv AT casolaclaudio evolutionaryoriginofregulatoryregionsofretrogenesinitdrosophilait
AT baiyongsheng evolutionaryoriginofregulatoryregionsofretrogenesinitdrosophilait
AT betranesther evolutionaryoriginofregulatoryregionsofretrogenesinitdrosophilait
_version_ 1725513175124672512