Efficacy of Silicone Gel versus Silicone Gel Sheet in Hypertrophic Scar Prevention of Deep Hand Burn Patients with Skin Graft: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial and Systematic Review

Background:. Burn injuries are burdensome to the public health system. Hypertrophic scars are the most common undesirable sequelae associated with burn scar contracture, resulting in reduced hand function. This study compared 2 different forms of silicone combined with pressure garment (PG) to deter...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chatchai Pruksapong, MD, PhD, FRCST, Chairat Burusapat, FRCST, Natthawoot Hongkarnjanakul, FRCST
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer 2020-10-01
Series:Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open
Online Access:http://journals.lww.com/prsgo/fulltext/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003190
id doaj-f649f9ea936340e7a2ed182d7a7c8b57
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f649f9ea936340e7a2ed182d7a7c8b572020-12-23T08:14:28ZengWolters KluwerPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open2169-75742020-10-01810e319010.1097/GOX.0000000000003190202010000-00024Efficacy of Silicone Gel versus Silicone Gel Sheet in Hypertrophic Scar Prevention of Deep Hand Burn Patients with Skin Graft: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial and Systematic ReviewChatchai Pruksapong, MD, PhD, FRCST0Chairat Burusapat, FRCST1Natthawoot Hongkarnjanakul, FRCST2From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Phramongkutklao Hospital and College of Medicine, Bangkok, Thailand.From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Phramongkutklao Hospital and College of Medicine, Bangkok, Thailand.From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Phramongkutklao Hospital and College of Medicine, Bangkok, Thailand.Background:. Burn injuries are burdensome to the public health system. Hypertrophic scars are the most common undesirable sequelae associated with burn scar contracture, resulting in reduced hand function. This study compared 2 different forms of silicone combined with pressure garment (PG) to determine the efficacy in hypertrophic scar prevention in hand burns. Methods:. A systematic review was also performed, including only randomized control trials with silicone materials in burned patients. A prospective intraindividual randomized controlled trial was conducted to compare the efficacy of 3 treatment groups: silicone gel and silicone gel sheet combined with PG versus PG alone. Results:. There were no significant differences in all Vancouver Scar Scale parameters. Three of 6 Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Score parameters showed significant differences among the 3 groups (P < 0.05). Scar stiffness improved at 8- and 12-weeks follow-up in both silicone gel and silicone gel sheet combined with PG; however, there was no significant difference between silicone groups. Scar thickness significantly improved at 2, 4, and 8 weeks in the silicone gel group compared with PG. Scar irregularity significantly improved at 2, 4, 8, 16, and 20 weeks in both silicone combined PG groups compared with PG alone. Conclusions:. Silicone gel and silicone gel sheet combined with PG were more effective than PG alone in some aspects of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Score. However, there was no significant difference between the silicone gel and silicone gel sheet on the Vancouver Scar Scale.http://journals.lww.com/prsgo/fulltext/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003190
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Chatchai Pruksapong, MD, PhD, FRCST
Chairat Burusapat, FRCST
Natthawoot Hongkarnjanakul, FRCST
spellingShingle Chatchai Pruksapong, MD, PhD, FRCST
Chairat Burusapat, FRCST
Natthawoot Hongkarnjanakul, FRCST
Efficacy of Silicone Gel versus Silicone Gel Sheet in Hypertrophic Scar Prevention of Deep Hand Burn Patients with Skin Graft: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial and Systematic Review
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open
author_facet Chatchai Pruksapong, MD, PhD, FRCST
Chairat Burusapat, FRCST
Natthawoot Hongkarnjanakul, FRCST
author_sort Chatchai Pruksapong, MD, PhD, FRCST
title Efficacy of Silicone Gel versus Silicone Gel Sheet in Hypertrophic Scar Prevention of Deep Hand Burn Patients with Skin Graft: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial and Systematic Review
title_short Efficacy of Silicone Gel versus Silicone Gel Sheet in Hypertrophic Scar Prevention of Deep Hand Burn Patients with Skin Graft: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial and Systematic Review
title_full Efficacy of Silicone Gel versus Silicone Gel Sheet in Hypertrophic Scar Prevention of Deep Hand Burn Patients with Skin Graft: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial and Systematic Review
title_fullStr Efficacy of Silicone Gel versus Silicone Gel Sheet in Hypertrophic Scar Prevention of Deep Hand Burn Patients with Skin Graft: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial and Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of Silicone Gel versus Silicone Gel Sheet in Hypertrophic Scar Prevention of Deep Hand Burn Patients with Skin Graft: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial and Systematic Review
title_sort efficacy of silicone gel versus silicone gel sheet in hypertrophic scar prevention of deep hand burn patients with skin graft: a prospective randomized controlled trial and systematic review
publisher Wolters Kluwer
series Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open
issn 2169-7574
publishDate 2020-10-01
description Background:. Burn injuries are burdensome to the public health system. Hypertrophic scars are the most common undesirable sequelae associated with burn scar contracture, resulting in reduced hand function. This study compared 2 different forms of silicone combined with pressure garment (PG) to determine the efficacy in hypertrophic scar prevention in hand burns. Methods:. A systematic review was also performed, including only randomized control trials with silicone materials in burned patients. A prospective intraindividual randomized controlled trial was conducted to compare the efficacy of 3 treatment groups: silicone gel and silicone gel sheet combined with PG versus PG alone. Results:. There were no significant differences in all Vancouver Scar Scale parameters. Three of 6 Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Score parameters showed significant differences among the 3 groups (P < 0.05). Scar stiffness improved at 8- and 12-weeks follow-up in both silicone gel and silicone gel sheet combined with PG; however, there was no significant difference between silicone groups. Scar thickness significantly improved at 2, 4, and 8 weeks in the silicone gel group compared with PG. Scar irregularity significantly improved at 2, 4, 8, 16, and 20 weeks in both silicone combined PG groups compared with PG alone. Conclusions:. Silicone gel and silicone gel sheet combined with PG were more effective than PG alone in some aspects of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Score. However, there was no significant difference between the silicone gel and silicone gel sheet on the Vancouver Scar Scale.
url http://journals.lww.com/prsgo/fulltext/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003190
work_keys_str_mv AT chatchaipruksapongmdphdfrcst efficacyofsiliconegelversussiliconegelsheetinhypertrophicscarpreventionofdeephandburnpatientswithskingraftaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrialandsystematicreview
AT chairatburusapatfrcst efficacyofsiliconegelversussiliconegelsheetinhypertrophicscarpreventionofdeephandburnpatientswithskingraftaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrialandsystematicreview
AT natthawoothongkarnjanakulfrcst efficacyofsiliconegelversussiliconegelsheetinhypertrophicscarpreventionofdeephandburnpatientswithskingraftaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrialandsystematicreview
_version_ 1724372972139970560