An intensity matched comparison of laser- and contact heat evoked potentials

Abstract Previous studies comparing laser (LEPs) and contact heat evoked potentials (CHEPs) consistently reported higher amplitudes following laser compared to contact heat stimulation. However, none of the studies matched the perceived pain intensity, questioning if the observed difference in ampli...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Iara De Schoenmacker, Carson Berry, Jean-Sébastien Blouin, Jan Rosner, Michèle Hubli, Catherine R. Jutzeler, John L. K. Kramer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Publishing Group 2021-03-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85819-w
id doaj-f6711eb6637448069ccc432798a6641d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f6711eb6637448069ccc432798a6641d2021-03-28T11:30:06ZengNature Publishing GroupScientific Reports2045-23222021-03-0111111210.1038/s41598-021-85819-wAn intensity matched comparison of laser- and contact heat evoked potentialsIara De Schoenmacker0Carson Berry1Jean-Sébastien Blouin2Jan Rosner3Michèle Hubli4Catherine R. Jutzeler5John L. K. Kramer6International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (ICORD), University of British ColumbiaInternational Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (ICORD), University of British ColumbiaSchool of Kinesiology, University of British ColumbiaSpinal Cord Injury Center, University Hospital Balgrist, University of ZurichSpinal Cord Injury Center, University Hospital Balgrist, University of ZurichInternational Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (ICORD), University of British ColumbiaInternational Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (ICORD), University of British ColumbiaAbstract Previous studies comparing laser (LEPs) and contact heat evoked potentials (CHEPs) consistently reported higher amplitudes following laser compared to contact heat stimulation. However, none of the studies matched the perceived pain intensity, questioning if the observed difference in amplitude is due to biophysical differences between the two methods or a mismatch in stimulation intensity. The aims of the current study were twofold: (1) to directly compare the brain potentials induced by intensity matched laser and contact heat stimulation and (2) investigate how capsaicin-induced secondary hyperalgesia modulates LEPs and CHEPs. Twenty-one healthy subjects were recruited and measured at four experimental sessions: (1) CHEPs + sham, (2) LEPs + sham, (3) CHEPs + capsaicin, and (4) LEPs + capsaicin. Baseline (sham) LEPs latency was significantly shorter and amplitude significantly larger compared to CHEPs, even when matched for perceived pain. Neither CHEPs nor LEPs was sensitive enough to detect secondary hyperalgesia. These differences provide evidence that a faster heating rate results in an earlier and more synchronized LEPs than CHEPs. To our knowledge, this was the first study to match perceived intensity of contact heat and laser stimulations, revealing distinct advantages associated with the acquisition of LEPs.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85819-w
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Iara De Schoenmacker
Carson Berry
Jean-Sébastien Blouin
Jan Rosner
Michèle Hubli
Catherine R. Jutzeler
John L. K. Kramer
spellingShingle Iara De Schoenmacker
Carson Berry
Jean-Sébastien Blouin
Jan Rosner
Michèle Hubli
Catherine R. Jutzeler
John L. K. Kramer
An intensity matched comparison of laser- and contact heat evoked potentials
Scientific Reports
author_facet Iara De Schoenmacker
Carson Berry
Jean-Sébastien Blouin
Jan Rosner
Michèle Hubli
Catherine R. Jutzeler
John L. K. Kramer
author_sort Iara De Schoenmacker
title An intensity matched comparison of laser- and contact heat evoked potentials
title_short An intensity matched comparison of laser- and contact heat evoked potentials
title_full An intensity matched comparison of laser- and contact heat evoked potentials
title_fullStr An intensity matched comparison of laser- and contact heat evoked potentials
title_full_unstemmed An intensity matched comparison of laser- and contact heat evoked potentials
title_sort intensity matched comparison of laser- and contact heat evoked potentials
publisher Nature Publishing Group
series Scientific Reports
issn 2045-2322
publishDate 2021-03-01
description Abstract Previous studies comparing laser (LEPs) and contact heat evoked potentials (CHEPs) consistently reported higher amplitudes following laser compared to contact heat stimulation. However, none of the studies matched the perceived pain intensity, questioning if the observed difference in amplitude is due to biophysical differences between the two methods or a mismatch in stimulation intensity. The aims of the current study were twofold: (1) to directly compare the brain potentials induced by intensity matched laser and contact heat stimulation and (2) investigate how capsaicin-induced secondary hyperalgesia modulates LEPs and CHEPs. Twenty-one healthy subjects were recruited and measured at four experimental sessions: (1) CHEPs + sham, (2) LEPs + sham, (3) CHEPs + capsaicin, and (4) LEPs + capsaicin. Baseline (sham) LEPs latency was significantly shorter and amplitude significantly larger compared to CHEPs, even when matched for perceived pain. Neither CHEPs nor LEPs was sensitive enough to detect secondary hyperalgesia. These differences provide evidence that a faster heating rate results in an earlier and more synchronized LEPs than CHEPs. To our knowledge, this was the first study to match perceived intensity of contact heat and laser stimulations, revealing distinct advantages associated with the acquisition of LEPs.
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85819-w
work_keys_str_mv AT iaradeschoenmacker anintensitymatchedcomparisonoflaserandcontactheatevokedpotentials
AT carsonberry anintensitymatchedcomparisonoflaserandcontactheatevokedpotentials
AT jeansebastienblouin anintensitymatchedcomparisonoflaserandcontactheatevokedpotentials
AT janrosner anintensitymatchedcomparisonoflaserandcontactheatevokedpotentials
AT michelehubli anintensitymatchedcomparisonoflaserandcontactheatevokedpotentials
AT catherinerjutzeler anintensitymatchedcomparisonoflaserandcontactheatevokedpotentials
AT johnlkkramer anintensitymatchedcomparisonoflaserandcontactheatevokedpotentials
AT iaradeschoenmacker intensitymatchedcomparisonoflaserandcontactheatevokedpotentials
AT carsonberry intensitymatchedcomparisonoflaserandcontactheatevokedpotentials
AT jeansebastienblouin intensitymatchedcomparisonoflaserandcontactheatevokedpotentials
AT janrosner intensitymatchedcomparisonoflaserandcontactheatevokedpotentials
AT michelehubli intensitymatchedcomparisonoflaserandcontactheatevokedpotentials
AT catherinerjutzeler intensitymatchedcomparisonoflaserandcontactheatevokedpotentials
AT johnlkkramer intensitymatchedcomparisonoflaserandcontactheatevokedpotentials
_version_ 1724199921103405056