An intensity matched comparison of laser- and contact heat evoked potentials
Abstract Previous studies comparing laser (LEPs) and contact heat evoked potentials (CHEPs) consistently reported higher amplitudes following laser compared to contact heat stimulation. However, none of the studies matched the perceived pain intensity, questioning if the observed difference in ampli...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Nature Publishing Group
2021-03-01
|
Series: | Scientific Reports |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85819-w |
id |
doaj-f6711eb6637448069ccc432798a6641d |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-f6711eb6637448069ccc432798a6641d2021-03-28T11:30:06ZengNature Publishing GroupScientific Reports2045-23222021-03-0111111210.1038/s41598-021-85819-wAn intensity matched comparison of laser- and contact heat evoked potentialsIara De Schoenmacker0Carson Berry1Jean-Sébastien Blouin2Jan Rosner3Michèle Hubli4Catherine R. Jutzeler5John L. K. Kramer6International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (ICORD), University of British ColumbiaInternational Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (ICORD), University of British ColumbiaSchool of Kinesiology, University of British ColumbiaSpinal Cord Injury Center, University Hospital Balgrist, University of ZurichSpinal Cord Injury Center, University Hospital Balgrist, University of ZurichInternational Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (ICORD), University of British ColumbiaInternational Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (ICORD), University of British ColumbiaAbstract Previous studies comparing laser (LEPs) and contact heat evoked potentials (CHEPs) consistently reported higher amplitudes following laser compared to contact heat stimulation. However, none of the studies matched the perceived pain intensity, questioning if the observed difference in amplitude is due to biophysical differences between the two methods or a mismatch in stimulation intensity. The aims of the current study were twofold: (1) to directly compare the brain potentials induced by intensity matched laser and contact heat stimulation and (2) investigate how capsaicin-induced secondary hyperalgesia modulates LEPs and CHEPs. Twenty-one healthy subjects were recruited and measured at four experimental sessions: (1) CHEPs + sham, (2) LEPs + sham, (3) CHEPs + capsaicin, and (4) LEPs + capsaicin. Baseline (sham) LEPs latency was significantly shorter and amplitude significantly larger compared to CHEPs, even when matched for perceived pain. Neither CHEPs nor LEPs was sensitive enough to detect secondary hyperalgesia. These differences provide evidence that a faster heating rate results in an earlier and more synchronized LEPs than CHEPs. To our knowledge, this was the first study to match perceived intensity of contact heat and laser stimulations, revealing distinct advantages associated with the acquisition of LEPs.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85819-w |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Iara De Schoenmacker Carson Berry Jean-Sébastien Blouin Jan Rosner Michèle Hubli Catherine R. Jutzeler John L. K. Kramer |
spellingShingle |
Iara De Schoenmacker Carson Berry Jean-Sébastien Blouin Jan Rosner Michèle Hubli Catherine R. Jutzeler John L. K. Kramer An intensity matched comparison of laser- and contact heat evoked potentials Scientific Reports |
author_facet |
Iara De Schoenmacker Carson Berry Jean-Sébastien Blouin Jan Rosner Michèle Hubli Catherine R. Jutzeler John L. K. Kramer |
author_sort |
Iara De Schoenmacker |
title |
An intensity matched comparison of laser- and contact heat evoked potentials |
title_short |
An intensity matched comparison of laser- and contact heat evoked potentials |
title_full |
An intensity matched comparison of laser- and contact heat evoked potentials |
title_fullStr |
An intensity matched comparison of laser- and contact heat evoked potentials |
title_full_unstemmed |
An intensity matched comparison of laser- and contact heat evoked potentials |
title_sort |
intensity matched comparison of laser- and contact heat evoked potentials |
publisher |
Nature Publishing Group |
series |
Scientific Reports |
issn |
2045-2322 |
publishDate |
2021-03-01 |
description |
Abstract Previous studies comparing laser (LEPs) and contact heat evoked potentials (CHEPs) consistently reported higher amplitudes following laser compared to contact heat stimulation. However, none of the studies matched the perceived pain intensity, questioning if the observed difference in amplitude is due to biophysical differences between the two methods or a mismatch in stimulation intensity. The aims of the current study were twofold: (1) to directly compare the brain potentials induced by intensity matched laser and contact heat stimulation and (2) investigate how capsaicin-induced secondary hyperalgesia modulates LEPs and CHEPs. Twenty-one healthy subjects were recruited and measured at four experimental sessions: (1) CHEPs + sham, (2) LEPs + sham, (3) CHEPs + capsaicin, and (4) LEPs + capsaicin. Baseline (sham) LEPs latency was significantly shorter and amplitude significantly larger compared to CHEPs, even when matched for perceived pain. Neither CHEPs nor LEPs was sensitive enough to detect secondary hyperalgesia. These differences provide evidence that a faster heating rate results in an earlier and more synchronized LEPs than CHEPs. To our knowledge, this was the first study to match perceived intensity of contact heat and laser stimulations, revealing distinct advantages associated with the acquisition of LEPs. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85819-w |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT iaradeschoenmacker anintensitymatchedcomparisonoflaserandcontactheatevokedpotentials AT carsonberry anintensitymatchedcomparisonoflaserandcontactheatevokedpotentials AT jeansebastienblouin anintensitymatchedcomparisonoflaserandcontactheatevokedpotentials AT janrosner anintensitymatchedcomparisonoflaserandcontactheatevokedpotentials AT michelehubli anintensitymatchedcomparisonoflaserandcontactheatevokedpotentials AT catherinerjutzeler anintensitymatchedcomparisonoflaserandcontactheatevokedpotentials AT johnlkkramer anintensitymatchedcomparisonoflaserandcontactheatevokedpotentials AT iaradeschoenmacker intensitymatchedcomparisonoflaserandcontactheatevokedpotentials AT carsonberry intensitymatchedcomparisonoflaserandcontactheatevokedpotentials AT jeansebastienblouin intensitymatchedcomparisonoflaserandcontactheatevokedpotentials AT janrosner intensitymatchedcomparisonoflaserandcontactheatevokedpotentials AT michelehubli intensitymatchedcomparisonoflaserandcontactheatevokedpotentials AT catherinerjutzeler intensitymatchedcomparisonoflaserandcontactheatevokedpotentials AT johnlkkramer intensitymatchedcomparisonoflaserandcontactheatevokedpotentials |
_version_ |
1724199921103405056 |