Comparison of 3Â mm versus 4Â mm rigid endoscope in diagnostic nasal endoscopy
Objective: Compare nasal endoscopy with 3 mm versus conventional 4 mm rigid 30° endoscopes for visualization, patient comfort, and examiner ease. Methods: Ten adults with no previous sinus surgery underwent bilateral nasal endoscopy with both 4 mm and 3 mm endoscopes (resulting in 20 paired nas...
Main Authors: | Gregory S. Neel, Ryan L. Kau, Stephen F. Bansberg, Devyani Lal |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
KeAi Communications Co., Ltd.
2017-03-01
|
Series: | World Journal of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095881117300021 |
Similar Items
-
Primary endoscopic stapedotomy using 3 mm nasal endoscope: Audiologic and clinical outcomes
by: Pradeep Pradhan, et al.
Published: (2020-12-01) -
Rigid Nasal Endoscopy in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Epistaxis
by: Vinay Kumar M.V., et al.
Published: (2013-05-01) -
Comparative evaluation of posterior percutaneous endoscopy cervical discectomy using a 3.7 mm endoscope and a 6.9 mm endoscope for cervical disc herniation: a retrospective comparative cohort study
by: Tong Yu, et al.
Published: (2021-02-01) -
Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of laparoscopic 3 mm and 5 mm cup biopsies to wedge biopsies of canine livers
by: Tiffany L. Kimbrell, et al.
Published: (2018-03-01) -
Comparison of 6.0 mm versus 6.5 mm Optical Zone on Visual Outcomes after LASIK
by: Majid Moshirfar, et al.
Published: (2021-08-01)