Carbon and nitrogen dynamics and greenhouse gas emissions in constructed wetlands treating wastewater: a review

The removal efficiency of carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) in constructed wetlands (CWs) is very inconsistent and frequently does not reveal whether the removal processes are due to physical attenuation or whether the different species have been transformed to other reactive forms. Previous research on n...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: M. M. R. Jahangir, K. G. Richards, M. G. Healy, L. Gill, C. Müller, P. Johnston, O. Fenton
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2016-01-01
Series:Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
Online Access:http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/20/109/2016/hess-20-109-2016.pdf
id doaj-f76fb4426a4f45abbc5e8386b3ce16fc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f76fb4426a4f45abbc5e8386b3ce16fc2020-11-24T21:22:08ZengCopernicus PublicationsHydrology and Earth System Sciences1027-56061607-79382016-01-0120110912310.5194/hess-20-109-2016Carbon and nitrogen dynamics and greenhouse gas emissions in constructed wetlands treating wastewater: a reviewM. M. R. Jahangir0K. G. Richards1M. G. Healy2L. Gill3C. Müller4P. Johnston5O. Fenton6Department of Civil, Structural & Environmental Engineering, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, IrelandDepartment of Environment, Soils & Land Use, Teagasc Environment Research Centre, Johnstown Castle, Co. Wexford, IrelandCivil Engineering, National University of Ireland, Galway, Co. Galway, IrelandDepartment of Civil, Structural & Environmental Engineering, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, IrelandSchool of Biology and Environmental Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, IrelandDepartment of Civil, Structural & Environmental Engineering, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, IrelandDepartment of Environment, Soils & Land Use, Teagasc Environment Research Centre, Johnstown Castle, Co. Wexford, IrelandThe removal efficiency of carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) in constructed wetlands (CWs) is very inconsistent and frequently does not reveal whether the removal processes are due to physical attenuation or whether the different species have been transformed to other reactive forms. Previous research on nutrient removal in CWs did not consider the dynamics of <i>pollution swapping</i> (the increase of one pollutant as a result of a measure introduced to reduce a different pollutant) driven by transformational processes within and around the system. This paper aims to address this knowledge gap by reviewing the biogeochemical dynamics and fate of C and N in CWs and their potential impact on the environment, and by presenting novel ways in which these knowledge gaps may be eliminated. Nutrient removal in CWs varies with the type of CW, vegetation, climate, season, geographical region, and management practices. Horizontal flow CWs tend to have good nitrate (NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>) removal, as they provide good conditions for denitrification, but cannot remove ammonium (NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>) due to limited ability to nitrify NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>. Vertical flow CWs have good NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> removal, but their denitrification ability is low. Surface flow CWs decrease nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O) emissions but increase methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) emissions; subsurface flow CWs increase N<sub>2</sub>O and carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) emissions, but decrease CH<sub>4</sub> emissions. Mixed species of vegetation perform better than monocultures in increasing C and N removal and decreasing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, but empirical evidence is still scarce. Lower hydraulic loadings with higher hydraulic retention times enhance nutrient removal, but more empirical evidence is required to determine an optimum design. A conceptual model highlighting the current state of knowledge is presented and experimental work that should be undertaken to address knowledge gaps across CWs, vegetation and wastewater types, hydraulic loading rates and regimes, and retention times, is suggested. We recommend that further research on process-based C and N removal and on the balancing of end products into reactive and benign forms is critical to the assessment of the environmental performance of CWs.http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/20/109/2016/hess-20-109-2016.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author M. M. R. Jahangir
K. G. Richards
M. G. Healy
L. Gill
C. Müller
P. Johnston
O. Fenton
spellingShingle M. M. R. Jahangir
K. G. Richards
M. G. Healy
L. Gill
C. Müller
P. Johnston
O. Fenton
Carbon and nitrogen dynamics and greenhouse gas emissions in constructed wetlands treating wastewater: a review
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
author_facet M. M. R. Jahangir
K. G. Richards
M. G. Healy
L. Gill
C. Müller
P. Johnston
O. Fenton
author_sort M. M. R. Jahangir
title Carbon and nitrogen dynamics and greenhouse gas emissions in constructed wetlands treating wastewater: a review
title_short Carbon and nitrogen dynamics and greenhouse gas emissions in constructed wetlands treating wastewater: a review
title_full Carbon and nitrogen dynamics and greenhouse gas emissions in constructed wetlands treating wastewater: a review
title_fullStr Carbon and nitrogen dynamics and greenhouse gas emissions in constructed wetlands treating wastewater: a review
title_full_unstemmed Carbon and nitrogen dynamics and greenhouse gas emissions in constructed wetlands treating wastewater: a review
title_sort carbon and nitrogen dynamics and greenhouse gas emissions in constructed wetlands treating wastewater: a review
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
issn 1027-5606
1607-7938
publishDate 2016-01-01
description The removal efficiency of carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) in constructed wetlands (CWs) is very inconsistent and frequently does not reveal whether the removal processes are due to physical attenuation or whether the different species have been transformed to other reactive forms. Previous research on nutrient removal in CWs did not consider the dynamics of <i>pollution swapping</i> (the increase of one pollutant as a result of a measure introduced to reduce a different pollutant) driven by transformational processes within and around the system. This paper aims to address this knowledge gap by reviewing the biogeochemical dynamics and fate of C and N in CWs and their potential impact on the environment, and by presenting novel ways in which these knowledge gaps may be eliminated. Nutrient removal in CWs varies with the type of CW, vegetation, climate, season, geographical region, and management practices. Horizontal flow CWs tend to have good nitrate (NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>) removal, as they provide good conditions for denitrification, but cannot remove ammonium (NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>) due to limited ability to nitrify NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>. Vertical flow CWs have good NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> removal, but their denitrification ability is low. Surface flow CWs decrease nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O) emissions but increase methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) emissions; subsurface flow CWs increase N<sub>2</sub>O and carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) emissions, but decrease CH<sub>4</sub> emissions. Mixed species of vegetation perform better than monocultures in increasing C and N removal and decreasing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, but empirical evidence is still scarce. Lower hydraulic loadings with higher hydraulic retention times enhance nutrient removal, but more empirical evidence is required to determine an optimum design. A conceptual model highlighting the current state of knowledge is presented and experimental work that should be undertaken to address knowledge gaps across CWs, vegetation and wastewater types, hydraulic loading rates and regimes, and retention times, is suggested. We recommend that further research on process-based C and N removal and on the balancing of end products into reactive and benign forms is critical to the assessment of the environmental performance of CWs.
url http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/20/109/2016/hess-20-109-2016.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT mmrjahangir carbonandnitrogendynamicsandgreenhousegasemissionsinconstructedwetlandstreatingwastewaterareview
AT kgrichards carbonandnitrogendynamicsandgreenhousegasemissionsinconstructedwetlandstreatingwastewaterareview
AT mghealy carbonandnitrogendynamicsandgreenhousegasemissionsinconstructedwetlandstreatingwastewaterareview
AT lgill carbonandnitrogendynamicsandgreenhousegasemissionsinconstructedwetlandstreatingwastewaterareview
AT cmuller carbonandnitrogendynamicsandgreenhousegasemissionsinconstructedwetlandstreatingwastewaterareview
AT pjohnston carbonandnitrogendynamicsandgreenhousegasemissionsinconstructedwetlandstreatingwastewaterareview
AT ofenton carbonandnitrogendynamicsandgreenhousegasemissionsinconstructedwetlandstreatingwastewaterareview
_version_ 1725997290949181440