Energy and Exergy Analyses of a Flat Plate Solar Collector Using Various Nanofluids: An Analytical Approach

Energy and exergy (EnE) efficiencies are considered the most important parameters to compare the performance of various thermal systems. In this paper, an analysis was carried out for EnE efficiencies of a flat plate solar collector (FPSC) using four different kinds of nanofluids as flowing mediums,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: R. M. Mostafizur, M. G. Rasul, M. N. Nabi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-07-01
Series:Energies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/14/4305
id doaj-f771e8ef790f4157b59a3148c02104b6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f771e8ef790f4157b59a3148c02104b62021-07-23T13:39:11ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732021-07-01144305430510.3390/en14144305Energy and Exergy Analyses of a Flat Plate Solar Collector Using Various Nanofluids: An Analytical ApproachR. M. Mostafizur0M. G. Rasul1M. N. Nabi2School of Engineering and Technology, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, QLD 4702, AustraliaSchool of Engineering and Technology, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, QLD 4702, AustraliaClean Energy Academy, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, QLD 4702, AustraliaEnergy and exergy (EnE) efficiencies are considered the most important parameters to compare the performance of various thermal systems. In this paper, an analysis was carried out for EnE efficiencies of a flat plate solar collector (FPSC) using four different kinds of nanofluids as flowing mediums, namely, Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>/water, MgO/water, TiO<sub>2</sub>/water, and CuO/water, and compared with water as a flowing medium (traditional base fluid). The analysis considered nanofluids made of nanomaterials’ volume fractions of 1–4% with water. The volume flow rates of nanofluids and water were 1 to 4 L/min. The solar collector′s highest EnE efficiency values were obtained for CuO/water nanofluid among the four types of nanofluids mentioned above. The EnE efficiencies of the CuO nanofluid-operated solar collector were 38.21% and 34.06%, respectively, which is significantly higher than that of water-operated solar collectors. For the same volume flow rate, the mass flow rate was found to be 15.95% higher than water for the CuO nanofluid. The EnE efficiency of FPSC can also be increased by increasing the density and reducing the specific heat of the flowing medium.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/14/4305energyexergynanofluidsolar collectordead state
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author R. M. Mostafizur
M. G. Rasul
M. N. Nabi
spellingShingle R. M. Mostafizur
M. G. Rasul
M. N. Nabi
Energy and Exergy Analyses of a Flat Plate Solar Collector Using Various Nanofluids: An Analytical Approach
Energies
energy
exergy
nanofluid
solar collector
dead state
author_facet R. M. Mostafizur
M. G. Rasul
M. N. Nabi
author_sort R. M. Mostafizur
title Energy and Exergy Analyses of a Flat Plate Solar Collector Using Various Nanofluids: An Analytical Approach
title_short Energy and Exergy Analyses of a Flat Plate Solar Collector Using Various Nanofluids: An Analytical Approach
title_full Energy and Exergy Analyses of a Flat Plate Solar Collector Using Various Nanofluids: An Analytical Approach
title_fullStr Energy and Exergy Analyses of a Flat Plate Solar Collector Using Various Nanofluids: An Analytical Approach
title_full_unstemmed Energy and Exergy Analyses of a Flat Plate Solar Collector Using Various Nanofluids: An Analytical Approach
title_sort energy and exergy analyses of a flat plate solar collector using various nanofluids: an analytical approach
publisher MDPI AG
series Energies
issn 1996-1073
publishDate 2021-07-01
description Energy and exergy (EnE) efficiencies are considered the most important parameters to compare the performance of various thermal systems. In this paper, an analysis was carried out for EnE efficiencies of a flat plate solar collector (FPSC) using four different kinds of nanofluids as flowing mediums, namely, Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>/water, MgO/water, TiO<sub>2</sub>/water, and CuO/water, and compared with water as a flowing medium (traditional base fluid). The analysis considered nanofluids made of nanomaterials’ volume fractions of 1–4% with water. The volume flow rates of nanofluids and water were 1 to 4 L/min. The solar collector′s highest EnE efficiency values were obtained for CuO/water nanofluid among the four types of nanofluids mentioned above. The EnE efficiencies of the CuO nanofluid-operated solar collector were 38.21% and 34.06%, respectively, which is significantly higher than that of water-operated solar collectors. For the same volume flow rate, the mass flow rate was found to be 15.95% higher than water for the CuO nanofluid. The EnE efficiency of FPSC can also be increased by increasing the density and reducing the specific heat of the flowing medium.
topic energy
exergy
nanofluid
solar collector
dead state
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/14/4305
work_keys_str_mv AT rmmostafizur energyandexergyanalysesofaflatplatesolarcollectorusingvariousnanofluidsananalyticalapproach
AT mgrasul energyandexergyanalysesofaflatplatesolarcollectorusingvariousnanofluidsananalyticalapproach
AT mnnabi energyandexergyanalysesofaflatplatesolarcollectorusingvariousnanofluidsananalyticalapproach
_version_ 1721288628738457600