Energy and Exergy Analyses of a Flat Plate Solar Collector Using Various Nanofluids: An Analytical Approach
Energy and exergy (EnE) efficiencies are considered the most important parameters to compare the performance of various thermal systems. In this paper, an analysis was carried out for EnE efficiencies of a flat plate solar collector (FPSC) using four different kinds of nanofluids as flowing mediums,...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-07-01
|
Series: | Energies |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/14/4305 |
id |
doaj-f771e8ef790f4157b59a3148c02104b6 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-f771e8ef790f4157b59a3148c02104b62021-07-23T13:39:11ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732021-07-01144305430510.3390/en14144305Energy and Exergy Analyses of a Flat Plate Solar Collector Using Various Nanofluids: An Analytical ApproachR. M. Mostafizur0M. G. Rasul1M. N. Nabi2School of Engineering and Technology, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, QLD 4702, AustraliaSchool of Engineering and Technology, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, QLD 4702, AustraliaClean Energy Academy, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, QLD 4702, AustraliaEnergy and exergy (EnE) efficiencies are considered the most important parameters to compare the performance of various thermal systems. In this paper, an analysis was carried out for EnE efficiencies of a flat plate solar collector (FPSC) using four different kinds of nanofluids as flowing mediums, namely, Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>/water, MgO/water, TiO<sub>2</sub>/water, and CuO/water, and compared with water as a flowing medium (traditional base fluid). The analysis considered nanofluids made of nanomaterials’ volume fractions of 1–4% with water. The volume flow rates of nanofluids and water were 1 to 4 L/min. The solar collector′s highest EnE efficiency values were obtained for CuO/water nanofluid among the four types of nanofluids mentioned above. The EnE efficiencies of the CuO nanofluid-operated solar collector were 38.21% and 34.06%, respectively, which is significantly higher than that of water-operated solar collectors. For the same volume flow rate, the mass flow rate was found to be 15.95% higher than water for the CuO nanofluid. The EnE efficiency of FPSC can also be increased by increasing the density and reducing the specific heat of the flowing medium.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/14/4305energyexergynanofluidsolar collectordead state |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
R. M. Mostafizur M. G. Rasul M. N. Nabi |
spellingShingle |
R. M. Mostafizur M. G. Rasul M. N. Nabi Energy and Exergy Analyses of a Flat Plate Solar Collector Using Various Nanofluids: An Analytical Approach Energies energy exergy nanofluid solar collector dead state |
author_facet |
R. M. Mostafizur M. G. Rasul M. N. Nabi |
author_sort |
R. M. Mostafizur |
title |
Energy and Exergy Analyses of a Flat Plate Solar Collector Using Various Nanofluids: An Analytical Approach |
title_short |
Energy and Exergy Analyses of a Flat Plate Solar Collector Using Various Nanofluids: An Analytical Approach |
title_full |
Energy and Exergy Analyses of a Flat Plate Solar Collector Using Various Nanofluids: An Analytical Approach |
title_fullStr |
Energy and Exergy Analyses of a Flat Plate Solar Collector Using Various Nanofluids: An Analytical Approach |
title_full_unstemmed |
Energy and Exergy Analyses of a Flat Plate Solar Collector Using Various Nanofluids: An Analytical Approach |
title_sort |
energy and exergy analyses of a flat plate solar collector using various nanofluids: an analytical approach |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Energies |
issn |
1996-1073 |
publishDate |
2021-07-01 |
description |
Energy and exergy (EnE) efficiencies are considered the most important parameters to compare the performance of various thermal systems. In this paper, an analysis was carried out for EnE efficiencies of a flat plate solar collector (FPSC) using four different kinds of nanofluids as flowing mediums, namely, Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>/water, MgO/water, TiO<sub>2</sub>/water, and CuO/water, and compared with water as a flowing medium (traditional base fluid). The analysis considered nanofluids made of nanomaterials’ volume fractions of 1–4% with water. The volume flow rates of nanofluids and water were 1 to 4 L/min. The solar collector′s highest EnE efficiency values were obtained for CuO/water nanofluid among the four types of nanofluids mentioned above. The EnE efficiencies of the CuO nanofluid-operated solar collector were 38.21% and 34.06%, respectively, which is significantly higher than that of water-operated solar collectors. For the same volume flow rate, the mass flow rate was found to be 15.95% higher than water for the CuO nanofluid. The EnE efficiency of FPSC can also be increased by increasing the density and reducing the specific heat of the flowing medium. |
topic |
energy exergy nanofluid solar collector dead state |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/14/4305 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT rmmostafizur energyandexergyanalysesofaflatplatesolarcollectorusingvariousnanofluidsananalyticalapproach AT mgrasul energyandexergyanalysesofaflatplatesolarcollectorusingvariousnanofluidsananalyticalapproach AT mnnabi energyandexergyanalysesofaflatplatesolarcollectorusingvariousnanofluidsananalyticalapproach |
_version_ |
1721288628738457600 |