Intensity of perinatal care, extreme prematurity and sensorimotor outcome at 2 years corrected age: evidence from the EPIPAGE-2 cohort study

Abstract Background Emerging evidence suggests intensity of perinatal care influences survival for extremely preterm babies. We evaluated the effect of differences in perinatal care intensity between centres on sensorimotor morbidity at 2 years of age. We hypothesised that hospitals with a higher in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andrei S. Morgan, Laurence Foix L’Helias, Caroline Diguisto, Laetitia Marchand-Martin, Monique Kaminski, Babak Khoshnood, Jennifer Zeitlin, Gérard Bréart, Xavier Durrmeyer, François Goffinet, Pierre-Yves Ancel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2018-12-01
Series:BMC Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12916-018-1206-4
id doaj-f78f0346cc1c41e5b3a437e33da1de96
record_format Article
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Andrei S. Morgan
Laurence Foix L’Helias
Caroline Diguisto
Laetitia Marchand-Martin
Monique Kaminski
Babak Khoshnood
Jennifer Zeitlin
Gérard Bréart
Xavier Durrmeyer
François Goffinet
Pierre-Yves Ancel
spellingShingle Andrei S. Morgan
Laurence Foix L’Helias
Caroline Diguisto
Laetitia Marchand-Martin
Monique Kaminski
Babak Khoshnood
Jennifer Zeitlin
Gérard Bréart
Xavier Durrmeyer
François Goffinet
Pierre-Yves Ancel
Intensity of perinatal care, extreme prematurity and sensorimotor outcome at 2 years corrected age: evidence from the EPIPAGE-2 cohort study
BMC Medicine
Extreme prematurity
Newborn
Perinatal intensity
Activity
Obstetric
Neonatal
author_facet Andrei S. Morgan
Laurence Foix L’Helias
Caroline Diguisto
Laetitia Marchand-Martin
Monique Kaminski
Babak Khoshnood
Jennifer Zeitlin
Gérard Bréart
Xavier Durrmeyer
François Goffinet
Pierre-Yves Ancel
author_sort Andrei S. Morgan
title Intensity of perinatal care, extreme prematurity and sensorimotor outcome at 2 years corrected age: evidence from the EPIPAGE-2 cohort study
title_short Intensity of perinatal care, extreme prematurity and sensorimotor outcome at 2 years corrected age: evidence from the EPIPAGE-2 cohort study
title_full Intensity of perinatal care, extreme prematurity and sensorimotor outcome at 2 years corrected age: evidence from the EPIPAGE-2 cohort study
title_fullStr Intensity of perinatal care, extreme prematurity and sensorimotor outcome at 2 years corrected age: evidence from the EPIPAGE-2 cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Intensity of perinatal care, extreme prematurity and sensorimotor outcome at 2 years corrected age: evidence from the EPIPAGE-2 cohort study
title_sort intensity of perinatal care, extreme prematurity and sensorimotor outcome at 2 years corrected age: evidence from the epipage-2 cohort study
publisher BMC
series BMC Medicine
issn 1741-7015
publishDate 2018-12-01
description Abstract Background Emerging evidence suggests intensity of perinatal care influences survival for extremely preterm babies. We evaluated the effect of differences in perinatal care intensity between centres on sensorimotor morbidity at 2 years of age. We hypothesised that hospitals with a higher intensity of perinatal care would have improved survival without increased disability. Methods Foetuses alive at maternal admission to a level 3 hospital in France in 2011, subsequently delivered between 22 and 26 weeks gestational age (GA) and included in the EPIPAGE-2 national prospective observational cohort study formed the baseline population. Level of intensity of perinatal care was assigned according to hospital of birth, categorised into three groups using ‘perinatal intensity’ ratios (ratio of 24–25 weeks GA babies admitted to neonatal intensive care to foetuses of the same GA alive at maternal admission to hospital). Multiple imputation was used to account for missing data; hierarchical logistic regression accounting for births nested within centres was then performed. Results One thousand one hundred twelve foetuses were included; 473 survived to 2 years of age (126 of 358 in low-intensity, 140 of 380 in medium-intensity and 207 of 374 in high-intensity hospitals). There were no differences in disability (adjusted odds ratios 0.93 (95% CI 0.28 to 3.04) and 1.04 (95% CI 0.34 to 3.14) in medium- and high- compared to low-intensity hospitals, respectively). Compared to low-intensity hospitals, survival without sensorimotor disability was increased in the population of foetuses alive at maternal admission to hospital and in live-born babies, but there were no differences when considering only babies admitted to NICU or survivors. Conclusions No difference in sensorimotor outcome for survivors of extremely preterm birth at 2 years of age was found according to the intensity of perinatal care provision. Active management of periviable births was associated with increased survival without sensorimotor disability.
topic Extreme prematurity
Newborn
Perinatal intensity
Activity
Obstetric
Neonatal
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12916-018-1206-4
work_keys_str_mv AT andreismorgan intensityofperinatalcareextremeprematurityandsensorimotoroutcomeat2yearscorrectedageevidencefromtheepipage2cohortstudy
AT laurencefoixlhelias intensityofperinatalcareextremeprematurityandsensorimotoroutcomeat2yearscorrectedageevidencefromtheepipage2cohortstudy
AT carolinediguisto intensityofperinatalcareextremeprematurityandsensorimotoroutcomeat2yearscorrectedageevidencefromtheepipage2cohortstudy
AT laetitiamarchandmartin intensityofperinatalcareextremeprematurityandsensorimotoroutcomeat2yearscorrectedageevidencefromtheepipage2cohortstudy
AT moniquekaminski intensityofperinatalcareextremeprematurityandsensorimotoroutcomeat2yearscorrectedageevidencefromtheepipage2cohortstudy
AT babakkhoshnood intensityofperinatalcareextremeprematurityandsensorimotoroutcomeat2yearscorrectedageevidencefromtheepipage2cohortstudy
AT jenniferzeitlin intensityofperinatalcareextremeprematurityandsensorimotoroutcomeat2yearscorrectedageevidencefromtheepipage2cohortstudy
AT gerardbreart intensityofperinatalcareextremeprematurityandsensorimotoroutcomeat2yearscorrectedageevidencefromtheepipage2cohortstudy
AT xavierdurrmeyer intensityofperinatalcareextremeprematurityandsensorimotoroutcomeat2yearscorrectedageevidencefromtheepipage2cohortstudy
AT francoisgoffinet intensityofperinatalcareextremeprematurityandsensorimotoroutcomeat2yearscorrectedageevidencefromtheepipage2cohortstudy
AT pierreyvesancel intensityofperinatalcareextremeprematurityandsensorimotoroutcomeat2yearscorrectedageevidencefromtheepipage2cohortstudy
_version_ 1725154157784989696
spelling doaj-f78f0346cc1c41e5b3a437e33da1de962020-11-25T01:15:10ZengBMCBMC Medicine1741-70152018-12-0116111210.1186/s12916-018-1206-4Intensity of perinatal care, extreme prematurity and sensorimotor outcome at 2 years corrected age: evidence from the EPIPAGE-2 cohort studyAndrei S. Morgan0Laurence Foix L’Helias1Caroline Diguisto2Laetitia Marchand-Martin3Monique Kaminski4Babak Khoshnood5Jennifer Zeitlin6Gérard Bréart7Xavier Durrmeyer8François Goffinet9Pierre-Yves Ancel10INSERM UMR 1153, Obstetrical, Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team (EPOPé), Centre for Epidemiology and Statistics Sorbonne Paris Cité, DHU Risks in Pregnancy, Paris Descartes University, Hôpital TenonINSERM UMR 1153, Obstetrical, Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team (EPOPé), Centre for Epidemiology and Statistics Sorbonne Paris Cité, DHU Risks in Pregnancy, Paris Descartes University, Hôpital TenonINSERM UMR 1153, Obstetrical, Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team (EPOPé), Centre for Epidemiology and Statistics Sorbonne Paris Cité, DHU Risks in Pregnancy, Paris Descartes University, Hôpital TenonINSERM UMR 1153, Obstetrical, Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team (EPOPé), Centre for Epidemiology and Statistics Sorbonne Paris Cité, DHU Risks in Pregnancy, Paris Descartes University, Hôpital TenonINSERM UMR 1153, Obstetrical, Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team (EPOPé), Centre for Epidemiology and Statistics Sorbonne Paris Cité, DHU Risks in Pregnancy, Paris Descartes University, Hôpital TenonINSERM UMR 1153, Obstetrical, Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team (EPOPé), Centre for Epidemiology and Statistics Sorbonne Paris Cité, DHU Risks in Pregnancy, Paris Descartes University, Hôpital TenonINSERM UMR 1153, Obstetrical, Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team (EPOPé), Centre for Epidemiology and Statistics Sorbonne Paris Cité, DHU Risks in Pregnancy, Paris Descartes University, Hôpital TenonINSERM UMR 1153, Obstetrical, Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team (EPOPé), Centre for Epidemiology and Statistics Sorbonne Paris Cité, DHU Risks in Pregnancy, Paris Descartes University, Hôpital TenonINSERM UMR 1153, Obstetrical, Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team (EPOPé), Centre for Epidemiology and Statistics Sorbonne Paris Cité, DHU Risks in Pregnancy, Paris Descartes University, Hôpital TenonINSERM UMR 1153, Obstetrical, Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team (EPOPé), Centre for Epidemiology and Statistics Sorbonne Paris Cité, DHU Risks in Pregnancy, Paris Descartes University, Hôpital TenonINSERM UMR 1153, Obstetrical, Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team (EPOPé), Centre for Epidemiology and Statistics Sorbonne Paris Cité, DHU Risks in Pregnancy, Paris Descartes University, Hôpital TenonAbstract Background Emerging evidence suggests intensity of perinatal care influences survival for extremely preterm babies. We evaluated the effect of differences in perinatal care intensity between centres on sensorimotor morbidity at 2 years of age. We hypothesised that hospitals with a higher intensity of perinatal care would have improved survival without increased disability. Methods Foetuses alive at maternal admission to a level 3 hospital in France in 2011, subsequently delivered between 22 and 26 weeks gestational age (GA) and included in the EPIPAGE-2 national prospective observational cohort study formed the baseline population. Level of intensity of perinatal care was assigned according to hospital of birth, categorised into three groups using ‘perinatal intensity’ ratios (ratio of 24–25 weeks GA babies admitted to neonatal intensive care to foetuses of the same GA alive at maternal admission to hospital). Multiple imputation was used to account for missing data; hierarchical logistic regression accounting for births nested within centres was then performed. Results One thousand one hundred twelve foetuses were included; 473 survived to 2 years of age (126 of 358 in low-intensity, 140 of 380 in medium-intensity and 207 of 374 in high-intensity hospitals). There were no differences in disability (adjusted odds ratios 0.93 (95% CI 0.28 to 3.04) and 1.04 (95% CI 0.34 to 3.14) in medium- and high- compared to low-intensity hospitals, respectively). Compared to low-intensity hospitals, survival without sensorimotor disability was increased in the population of foetuses alive at maternal admission to hospital and in live-born babies, but there were no differences when considering only babies admitted to NICU or survivors. Conclusions No difference in sensorimotor outcome for survivors of extremely preterm birth at 2 years of age was found according to the intensity of perinatal care provision. Active management of periviable births was associated with increased survival without sensorimotor disability.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12916-018-1206-4Extreme prematurityNewbornPerinatal intensityActivityObstetricNeonatal