Better is worse, worse is better: Reexamination of violations of dominance in intertemporal choice
Recently, Scholten and Read (2014) found new violations of dominance in intertemporal choice. Although adding a small receipt before a delayed payment or adding a small delayed receipt after an immediate receipt makes the prospect objectively better, it decreases the preference for that prospect (be...
Main Authors: | Cheng-Ming Jiang, Hong-Mei Sun, Long-Fei Zhu, Lei Zhao, Hong-Zhi Liu, Hong-Yue Sun |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Society for Judgment and Decision Making
2017-05-01
|
Series: | Judgment and Decision Making |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journal.sjdm.org/17/17223/jdm17223.pdf |
Similar Items
-
Introducing money at
any time can reduce discounting in intertemporal choices with rewards: An
extension of the upfront money effect
by: Hong-Yue Sun, et al.
Published: (2015-11-01) -
New paradoxes in intertemporal choice
by: Li-Lin Rao, et al.
Published: (2011-02-01) -
Introducing upfront money can decrease discounting in intertemporal choices with losses
by: Cheng-Ming Jiang, et al.
Published: (2016-08-01) -
Introducing upfront
losses as well as gains decreases impatience in intertemporal choices with
rewards
by: Cheng-Ming Jiang, et al.
Published: (2014-07-01) -
The relationship
between intertemporal choice and following the path of least resistance across
choices, preferences, and beliefs
by: Amitai Shenhav, et al.
Published: (2017-01-01)