The Social Nature of Argumentative Practices: The Philosophy of Argument and Audience Reception

The Social Nature of Argumentative Practices: The Philosophy of Argument and Audience Reception

Show other versions (1)

Abstract: This article reviews Christopher W. Tindale’s The Philosophy of Argument and Audience Reception (Cambridge, 2015). Résumé: Cet article est une critique de The Philosophy of Argument and Audience Reception (Cambridge, 2015) de Christopher W. Tindale.

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Paula Olmos
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Windsor 2018-03-01
Series:Informal Logic
Subjects:
Aristotle, audience, audiences, argument, emotion, Perelman, philosophy of argument, reason, rhetoric, rhetorical argument, Tindale
Online Access:https://ojs.uwindsor.ca/ojs/leddy/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/5071
id doaj-f7b213dfb3b844afaaeba7a6b95d681f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f7b213dfb3b844afaaeba7a6b95d681f2020-11-25T03:49:40ZengUniversity of WindsorInformal Logic0824-25770824-25772018-03-0138115118310.22329/il.v38i1.50713869The Social Nature of Argumentative Practices: The Philosophy of Argument and Audience ReceptionPaula Olmos0Universidad Autónoma de Madrid Facultad de Filosofía y LetrasAbstract: This article reviews Christopher W. Tindale’s The Philosophy of Argument and Audience Reception (Cambridge, 2015). Résumé: Cet article est une critique de The Philosophy of Argument and Audience Reception (Cambridge, 2015) de Christopher W. Tindale.https://ojs.uwindsor.ca/ojs/leddy/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/5071Aristotle, audience, audiences, argument, emotion, Perelman, philosophy of argument, reason, rhetoric, rhetorical argument, Tindale
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Paula Olmos
spellingShingle Paula Olmos
The Social Nature of Argumentative Practices: The Philosophy of Argument and Audience Reception
Informal Logic
Aristotle, audience, audiences, argument, emotion, Perelman, philosophy of argument, reason, rhetoric, rhetorical argument, Tindale
author_facet Paula Olmos
author_sort Paula Olmos
title The Social Nature of Argumentative Practices: The Philosophy of Argument and Audience Reception
title_short The Social Nature of Argumentative Practices: The Philosophy of Argument and Audience Reception
title_full The Social Nature of Argumentative Practices: The Philosophy of Argument and Audience Reception
title_fullStr The Social Nature of Argumentative Practices: The Philosophy of Argument and Audience Reception
title_full_unstemmed The Social Nature of Argumentative Practices: The Philosophy of Argument and Audience Reception
title_sort social nature of argumentative practices: the philosophy of argument and audience reception
publisher University of Windsor
series Informal Logic
issn 0824-2577
0824-2577
publishDate 2018-03-01
description Abstract: This article reviews Christopher W. Tindale’s The Philosophy of Argument and Audience Reception (Cambridge, 2015). Résumé: Cet article est une critique de The Philosophy of Argument and Audience Reception (Cambridge, 2015) de Christopher W. Tindale.
topic Aristotle, audience, audiences, argument, emotion, Perelman, philosophy of argument, reason, rhetoric, rhetorical argument, Tindale
url https://ojs.uwindsor.ca/ojs/leddy/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/5071
work_keys_str_mv AT paulaolmos thesocialnatureofargumentativepracticesthephilosophyofargumentandaudiencereception
AT paulaolmos socialnatureofargumentativepracticesthephilosophyofargumentandaudiencereception
_version_ 1724493997298155520

Similar Items