An Economic Analysis of Strategies to Control Clostridium Difficile Transmission and Infection Using an Agent-Based Simulation Model.

BACKGROUND:A number of strategies exist to reduce Clostridium difficile (C. difficile) transmission. We conducted an economic evaluation of "bundling" these strategies together. METHODS:We constructed an agent-based computer simulation of nosocomial C. difficile transmission and infection...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Richard E Nelson, Makoto Jones, Molly Leecaster, Matthew H Samore, William Ray, Angela Huttner, Benedikt Huttner, Karim Khader, Vanessa W Stevens, Dale Gerding, Marin L Schweizer, Michael A Rubin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2016-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4816545?pdf=render
id doaj-f7b29dbbf9014627a8f96a10903e989e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f7b29dbbf9014627a8f96a10903e989e2020-11-24T21:35:48ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032016-01-01113e015224810.1371/journal.pone.0152248An Economic Analysis of Strategies to Control Clostridium Difficile Transmission and Infection Using an Agent-Based Simulation Model.Richard E NelsonMakoto JonesMolly LeecasterMatthew H SamoreWilliam RayAngela HuttnerBenedikt HuttnerKarim KhaderVanessa W StevensDale GerdingMarin L SchweizerMichael A RubinBACKGROUND:A number of strategies exist to reduce Clostridium difficile (C. difficile) transmission. We conducted an economic evaluation of "bundling" these strategies together. METHODS:We constructed an agent-based computer simulation of nosocomial C. difficile transmission and infection in a hospital setting. This model included the following components: interactions between patients and health care workers; room contamination via C. difficile shedding; C. difficile hand carriage and removal via hand hygiene; patient acquisition of C. difficile via contact with contaminated rooms or health care workers; and patient antimicrobial use. Six interventions were introduced alone and "bundled" together: (a) aggressive C. difficile testing; (b) empiric isolation and treatment of symptomatic patients; (c) improved adherence to hand hygiene and (d) contact precautions; (e) improved use of soap and water for hand hygiene; and (f) improved environmental cleaning. Our analysis compared these interventions using values representing 3 different scenarios: (1) base-case (BASE) values that reflect typical hospital practice, (2) intervention (INT) values that represent implementation of hospital-wide efforts to reduce C. diff transmission, and (3) optimal (OPT) values representing the highest expected results from strong adherence to the interventions. Cost parameters for each intervention were obtained from published literature. We performed our analyses assuming low, normal, and high C. difficile importation prevalence and transmissibility of C. difficile. RESULTS:INT levels of the "bundled" intervention were cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000/quality-adjusted life-year in all importation prevalence and transmissibility scenarios. OPT levels of intervention were cost-effective for normal and high importation prevalence and transmissibility scenarios. When analyzed separately, hand hygiene compliance, environmental decontamination, and empiric isolation and treatment were the interventions that had the greatest impact on both cost and effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS:A combination of available interventions to prevent CDI is likely to be cost-effective but the cost-effectiveness varies for different levels of intensity of the interventions depending on epidemiological conditions such as C. difficile importation prevalence and transmissibility.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4816545?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Richard E Nelson
Makoto Jones
Molly Leecaster
Matthew H Samore
William Ray
Angela Huttner
Benedikt Huttner
Karim Khader
Vanessa W Stevens
Dale Gerding
Marin L Schweizer
Michael A Rubin
spellingShingle Richard E Nelson
Makoto Jones
Molly Leecaster
Matthew H Samore
William Ray
Angela Huttner
Benedikt Huttner
Karim Khader
Vanessa W Stevens
Dale Gerding
Marin L Schweizer
Michael A Rubin
An Economic Analysis of Strategies to Control Clostridium Difficile Transmission and Infection Using an Agent-Based Simulation Model.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Richard E Nelson
Makoto Jones
Molly Leecaster
Matthew H Samore
William Ray
Angela Huttner
Benedikt Huttner
Karim Khader
Vanessa W Stevens
Dale Gerding
Marin L Schweizer
Michael A Rubin
author_sort Richard E Nelson
title An Economic Analysis of Strategies to Control Clostridium Difficile Transmission and Infection Using an Agent-Based Simulation Model.
title_short An Economic Analysis of Strategies to Control Clostridium Difficile Transmission and Infection Using an Agent-Based Simulation Model.
title_full An Economic Analysis of Strategies to Control Clostridium Difficile Transmission and Infection Using an Agent-Based Simulation Model.
title_fullStr An Economic Analysis of Strategies to Control Clostridium Difficile Transmission and Infection Using an Agent-Based Simulation Model.
title_full_unstemmed An Economic Analysis of Strategies to Control Clostridium Difficile Transmission and Infection Using an Agent-Based Simulation Model.
title_sort economic analysis of strategies to control clostridium difficile transmission and infection using an agent-based simulation model.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2016-01-01
description BACKGROUND:A number of strategies exist to reduce Clostridium difficile (C. difficile) transmission. We conducted an economic evaluation of "bundling" these strategies together. METHODS:We constructed an agent-based computer simulation of nosocomial C. difficile transmission and infection in a hospital setting. This model included the following components: interactions between patients and health care workers; room contamination via C. difficile shedding; C. difficile hand carriage and removal via hand hygiene; patient acquisition of C. difficile via contact with contaminated rooms or health care workers; and patient antimicrobial use. Six interventions were introduced alone and "bundled" together: (a) aggressive C. difficile testing; (b) empiric isolation and treatment of symptomatic patients; (c) improved adherence to hand hygiene and (d) contact precautions; (e) improved use of soap and water for hand hygiene; and (f) improved environmental cleaning. Our analysis compared these interventions using values representing 3 different scenarios: (1) base-case (BASE) values that reflect typical hospital practice, (2) intervention (INT) values that represent implementation of hospital-wide efforts to reduce C. diff transmission, and (3) optimal (OPT) values representing the highest expected results from strong adherence to the interventions. Cost parameters for each intervention were obtained from published literature. We performed our analyses assuming low, normal, and high C. difficile importation prevalence and transmissibility of C. difficile. RESULTS:INT levels of the "bundled" intervention were cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000/quality-adjusted life-year in all importation prevalence and transmissibility scenarios. OPT levels of intervention were cost-effective for normal and high importation prevalence and transmissibility scenarios. When analyzed separately, hand hygiene compliance, environmental decontamination, and empiric isolation and treatment were the interventions that had the greatest impact on both cost and effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS:A combination of available interventions to prevent CDI is likely to be cost-effective but the cost-effectiveness varies for different levels of intensity of the interventions depending on epidemiological conditions such as C. difficile importation prevalence and transmissibility.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4816545?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT richardenelson aneconomicanalysisofstrategiestocontrolclostridiumdifficiletransmissionandinfectionusinganagentbasedsimulationmodel
AT makotojones aneconomicanalysisofstrategiestocontrolclostridiumdifficiletransmissionandinfectionusinganagentbasedsimulationmodel
AT mollyleecaster aneconomicanalysisofstrategiestocontrolclostridiumdifficiletransmissionandinfectionusinganagentbasedsimulationmodel
AT matthewhsamore aneconomicanalysisofstrategiestocontrolclostridiumdifficiletransmissionandinfectionusinganagentbasedsimulationmodel
AT williamray aneconomicanalysisofstrategiestocontrolclostridiumdifficiletransmissionandinfectionusinganagentbasedsimulationmodel
AT angelahuttner aneconomicanalysisofstrategiestocontrolclostridiumdifficiletransmissionandinfectionusinganagentbasedsimulationmodel
AT benedikthuttner aneconomicanalysisofstrategiestocontrolclostridiumdifficiletransmissionandinfectionusinganagentbasedsimulationmodel
AT karimkhader aneconomicanalysisofstrategiestocontrolclostridiumdifficiletransmissionandinfectionusinganagentbasedsimulationmodel
AT vanessawstevens aneconomicanalysisofstrategiestocontrolclostridiumdifficiletransmissionandinfectionusinganagentbasedsimulationmodel
AT dalegerding aneconomicanalysisofstrategiestocontrolclostridiumdifficiletransmissionandinfectionusinganagentbasedsimulationmodel
AT marinlschweizer aneconomicanalysisofstrategiestocontrolclostridiumdifficiletransmissionandinfectionusinganagentbasedsimulationmodel
AT michaelarubin aneconomicanalysisofstrategiestocontrolclostridiumdifficiletransmissionandinfectionusinganagentbasedsimulationmodel
AT richardenelson economicanalysisofstrategiestocontrolclostridiumdifficiletransmissionandinfectionusinganagentbasedsimulationmodel
AT makotojones economicanalysisofstrategiestocontrolclostridiumdifficiletransmissionandinfectionusinganagentbasedsimulationmodel
AT mollyleecaster economicanalysisofstrategiestocontrolclostridiumdifficiletransmissionandinfectionusinganagentbasedsimulationmodel
AT matthewhsamore economicanalysisofstrategiestocontrolclostridiumdifficiletransmissionandinfectionusinganagentbasedsimulationmodel
AT williamray economicanalysisofstrategiestocontrolclostridiumdifficiletransmissionandinfectionusinganagentbasedsimulationmodel
AT angelahuttner economicanalysisofstrategiestocontrolclostridiumdifficiletransmissionandinfectionusinganagentbasedsimulationmodel
AT benedikthuttner economicanalysisofstrategiestocontrolclostridiumdifficiletransmissionandinfectionusinganagentbasedsimulationmodel
AT karimkhader economicanalysisofstrategiestocontrolclostridiumdifficiletransmissionandinfectionusinganagentbasedsimulationmodel
AT vanessawstevens economicanalysisofstrategiestocontrolclostridiumdifficiletransmissionandinfectionusinganagentbasedsimulationmodel
AT dalegerding economicanalysisofstrategiestocontrolclostridiumdifficiletransmissionandinfectionusinganagentbasedsimulationmodel
AT marinlschweizer economicanalysisofstrategiestocontrolclostridiumdifficiletransmissionandinfectionusinganagentbasedsimulationmodel
AT michaelarubin economicanalysisofstrategiestocontrolclostridiumdifficiletransmissionandinfectionusinganagentbasedsimulationmodel
_version_ 1725943866716061696