Willpower and conscious percept: volitional switching in binocular rivalry.

When dissimilar images are presented to the left and right eyes, awareness switches spontaneously between the two images, such that one of the images is suppressed from awareness while the other is perceptually dominant. For over 170 years, it has been accepted that even though the periods of domina...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Laila Hugrass, David Crewther
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2012-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3338481?pdf=render
id doaj-f7bb2d7040f44f4a8f55f717cdd11a3d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f7bb2d7040f44f4a8f55f717cdd11a3d2020-11-25T00:10:59ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032012-01-0174e3596310.1371/journal.pone.0035963Willpower and conscious percept: volitional switching in binocular rivalry.Laila HugrassDavid CrewtherWhen dissimilar images are presented to the left and right eyes, awareness switches spontaneously between the two images, such that one of the images is suppressed from awareness while the other is perceptually dominant. For over 170 years, it has been accepted that even though the periods of dominance are subject to attentional processes, we have no inherent control over perceptual switching. Here, we revisit this issue in response to evidence that top-down attention can target perceptually suppressed 'vision for action' representations in the dorsal stream. We investigated volitional control over rivalry between apparent motion (AM), drifting (DM) and stationary (ST) grating pairs. Observers demonstrated a remarkable ability to generate intentional switches in the AM and D conditions, but not in the ST condition. Corresponding switches in the pursuit direction of optokinetic nystagmus verified this finding objectively. We showed it is unlikely that intentional perceptual switches were triggered by saccadic eye movements, because their frequency was reduced substantially in the volitional condition and did not change around the time of perceptual switches. Hence, we propose that synergy between dorsal and ventral stream representations provides the missing link in establishing volitional control over rivalrous conscious percepts.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3338481?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Laila Hugrass
David Crewther
spellingShingle Laila Hugrass
David Crewther
Willpower and conscious percept: volitional switching in binocular rivalry.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Laila Hugrass
David Crewther
author_sort Laila Hugrass
title Willpower and conscious percept: volitional switching in binocular rivalry.
title_short Willpower and conscious percept: volitional switching in binocular rivalry.
title_full Willpower and conscious percept: volitional switching in binocular rivalry.
title_fullStr Willpower and conscious percept: volitional switching in binocular rivalry.
title_full_unstemmed Willpower and conscious percept: volitional switching in binocular rivalry.
title_sort willpower and conscious percept: volitional switching in binocular rivalry.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2012-01-01
description When dissimilar images are presented to the left and right eyes, awareness switches spontaneously between the two images, such that one of the images is suppressed from awareness while the other is perceptually dominant. For over 170 years, it has been accepted that even though the periods of dominance are subject to attentional processes, we have no inherent control over perceptual switching. Here, we revisit this issue in response to evidence that top-down attention can target perceptually suppressed 'vision for action' representations in the dorsal stream. We investigated volitional control over rivalry between apparent motion (AM), drifting (DM) and stationary (ST) grating pairs. Observers demonstrated a remarkable ability to generate intentional switches in the AM and D conditions, but not in the ST condition. Corresponding switches in the pursuit direction of optokinetic nystagmus verified this finding objectively. We showed it is unlikely that intentional perceptual switches were triggered by saccadic eye movements, because their frequency was reduced substantially in the volitional condition and did not change around the time of perceptual switches. Hence, we propose that synergy between dorsal and ventral stream representations provides the missing link in establishing volitional control over rivalrous conscious percepts.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3338481?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT lailahugrass willpowerandconsciousperceptvolitionalswitchinginbinocularrivalry
AT davidcrewther willpowerandconsciousperceptvolitionalswitchinginbinocularrivalry
_version_ 1725405868635193344