Mitosis detection using generic features and an ensemble of cascade adaboosts

Context: Mitosis count is one of the factors that pathologists use to assess the risk of metastasis and survival of the patients, which are affected by the breast cancer. Aims: We investigate an application of a set of generic features and an ensemble of cascade adaboosts to the automated mitosis de...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: F Boray Tek
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2013-01-01
Series:Journal of Pathology Informatics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jpathinformatics.org/article.asp?issn=2153-3539;year=2013;volume=4;issue=1;spage=12;epage=12;aulast=Tek
id doaj-f7bb3b794a754f148046a3f635697952
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f7bb3b794a754f148046a3f6356979522020-11-24T23:30:50ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Pathology Informatics2153-35392153-35392013-01-0141121210.4103/2153-3539.112697Mitosis detection using generic features and an ensemble of cascade adaboostsF Boray TekContext: Mitosis count is one of the factors that pathologists use to assess the risk of metastasis and survival of the patients, which are affected by the breast cancer. Aims: We investigate an application of a set of generic features and an ensemble of cascade adaboosts to the automated mitosis detection. Calculation of the features rely minimally on object-level descriptions and thus require minimal segmentation. Materials and Methods: The proposed work was developed and tested on International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR) 2012 mitosis detection contest data. Statistical Analysis Used: We plotted receiver operating characteristics curves of true positive versus false positive rates; calculated recall, precision, F-measure, and region overlap ratio measures. Results: We tested our features with two different classifier configurations: 1) An ensemble of single adaboosts, 2) an ensemble of cascade adaboosts. On the ICPR 2012 mitosis detection contest evaluation, the cascade ensemble scored 54, 62.7, and 58, whereas the non-cascade version scored 68, 28.1, and 39.7 for the recall, precision, and F-measure measures, respectively. Mostly used features in the adaboost classifier rules were a shape-based feature, which counted granularity and a color-based feature, which relied on Red, Green, and Blue channel statistics. Conclusions: The features, which express the granular structure and color variations, are found useful for mitosis detection. The ensemble of adaboosts performs better than the individual adaboost classifiers. Moreover, the ensemble of cascaded adaboosts was better than the ensemble of single adaboosts for mitosis detection.http://www.jpathinformatics.org/article.asp?issn=2153-3539;year=2013;volume=4;issue=1;spage=12;epage=12;aulast=TekMitosis detectionarea granulometrycascade adaboostcost-sensitive learningensemble classifier
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author F Boray Tek
spellingShingle F Boray Tek
Mitosis detection using generic features and an ensemble of cascade adaboosts
Journal of Pathology Informatics
Mitosis detection
area granulometry
cascade adaboost
cost-sensitive learning
ensemble classifier
author_facet F Boray Tek
author_sort F Boray Tek
title Mitosis detection using generic features and an ensemble of cascade adaboosts
title_short Mitosis detection using generic features and an ensemble of cascade adaboosts
title_full Mitosis detection using generic features and an ensemble of cascade adaboosts
title_fullStr Mitosis detection using generic features and an ensemble of cascade adaboosts
title_full_unstemmed Mitosis detection using generic features and an ensemble of cascade adaboosts
title_sort mitosis detection using generic features and an ensemble of cascade adaboosts
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Journal of Pathology Informatics
issn 2153-3539
2153-3539
publishDate 2013-01-01
description Context: Mitosis count is one of the factors that pathologists use to assess the risk of metastasis and survival of the patients, which are affected by the breast cancer. Aims: We investigate an application of a set of generic features and an ensemble of cascade adaboosts to the automated mitosis detection. Calculation of the features rely minimally on object-level descriptions and thus require minimal segmentation. Materials and Methods: The proposed work was developed and tested on International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR) 2012 mitosis detection contest data. Statistical Analysis Used: We plotted receiver operating characteristics curves of true positive versus false positive rates; calculated recall, precision, F-measure, and region overlap ratio measures. Results: We tested our features with two different classifier configurations: 1) An ensemble of single adaboosts, 2) an ensemble of cascade adaboosts. On the ICPR 2012 mitosis detection contest evaluation, the cascade ensemble scored 54, 62.7, and 58, whereas the non-cascade version scored 68, 28.1, and 39.7 for the recall, precision, and F-measure measures, respectively. Mostly used features in the adaboost classifier rules were a shape-based feature, which counted granularity and a color-based feature, which relied on Red, Green, and Blue channel statistics. Conclusions: The features, which express the granular structure and color variations, are found useful for mitosis detection. The ensemble of adaboosts performs better than the individual adaboost classifiers. Moreover, the ensemble of cascaded adaboosts was better than the ensemble of single adaboosts for mitosis detection.
topic Mitosis detection
area granulometry
cascade adaboost
cost-sensitive learning
ensemble classifier
url http://www.jpathinformatics.org/article.asp?issn=2153-3539;year=2013;volume=4;issue=1;spage=12;epage=12;aulast=Tek
work_keys_str_mv AT fboraytek mitosisdetectionusinggenericfeaturesandanensembleofcascadeadaboosts
_version_ 1725540038649839616