Dry eye treatment optimization in patients prior to refractive surgery

• Main Authors: S. N. Sakhnov, S. V. Yanchenko, A. V. Malyshev, Z. M. Blyagoz, G. A. Klimenova
• Format: Article
• Language: Russian
• Published: Real Time Ltd 2018-12-01
• Series: Российский офтальмологический журнал
• Subjects: dry eye syndrome; meibomian gland dysfunction; eyelid hygiene; refractive surgery
• Online Access: https://roj.igb.ru/jour/article/view/199

Purpose. To evaluate the effectiveness of dry eye syndrome (DES) treatment in patients with meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) before refractive surgery.Materials and methods. We examined 48 women (aged 29.6 ± 3.9 years) with myopia, DES, and MGD of noninfectious etiology before performing LASIK. Group 1 of these patients received presurgical correction of DES for 2 months, including instillation of 3 % trehalose as a bioprotector (Thealoz®; 3–4 times a day); application of 5 % dexpanthenol in the conjunctival cavity (before going to bed); eyelid hygiene (2 times per day), which included cleaning (Theagel®), warm compresses on eyelid area, massage of eyelid margin (Blephaclean wipes). Group 2 only received bioprotective and reparative therapy for 2 months. Testing included a standard ophthalmological examination; assessment of DES symptoms (OSDI scale, points); BUT test (sec) and Schirmer-1 test (Sh-1, mm); measuring the height of the lower tear meniscus (optical coherence tomography, μm); lissamine green staining with calculation of xerosis index by Bijsterveld (points); assessment of MGD severity (points). Processing of the results included calculation of M ± s; Wilcoxon t-test, Mann Whitney U-test.Results. A positive change of OSDI (decrease from 31.9 ± 2.9 to 8.71 ± 1.1 points), xerosis index (decrease from 4.71 ± 0.5 to 2.1 ± 0.3 points) and BUT test (increase from 4.14 ± 0.53 to 8.66 ± 0.93 sec) was significantly stronger in patients of group 1 (p < 0.05) in comparison with patients of group 2 (decrease in OSDI from 33.2 ± 3.1 to 15.6 ± 2.4 points; decrease of xerosis index from 4.75 ± 0.50 to 3.7 ± 0.5 points; BUT increase from 4.21 ± 0.47 to 6.05 ± 0.73 sec). Apparently, this was caused by a significant decrease in the severity of MGD (from 2.1 ± 0.3 to 0.9 ± 0.2 points) and a decrease in the severity of lipid deficiency due to eyelid hygiene in patients of group 1. In group 2, MGD severity change proved unreliable. Change of Sh-1 and the height of the lower tear meniscus was unreliable in all cases. Conclusion. The inclusion of eyelid hygiene (Theagel and Blephaclean) in the pre-surgery preparation of patients with DES and MGD leads to a more significant correction of eye surface condition compared to isolated bioprotective and reparative therapy, thus providing an opportunity of more favorable conditions for carrying out surgical correction of ametropia.