“Randomised controlled trial of scalp cooling for the prevention of chemotherapy induced alopecia”
Background: Randomized controlled trials (RCT) of scalp cooling (SC) to prevent chemotherapy induced alopecia (CIA) did not evaluate its effect on hair regrowth (HR) and was conducted in a predominantly taxane (T) treated population. We conducted an RCT of SC in a setting of anthracycline (A) and ta...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2020-02-01
|
Series: | Breast |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960977619311117 |
id |
doaj-f7e7ad0ebb024748aa3419587b14117c |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-f7e7ad0ebb024748aa3419587b14117c2020-11-25T04:06:46ZengElsevierBreast1532-30802020-02-0149187193“Randomised controlled trial of scalp cooling for the prevention of chemotherapy induced alopecia”J. Bajpai0S. Kagwade1A. Chandrasekharan2S. Dandekar3S. Kanan4Y. Kembhavi5J. Ghosh6S.D. Banavali7S. Gupta8Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India; Corresponding author. Dr. Jyoti Bajpai Department of Medical Oncology Tata Memorial hospital, Dr. E Borges Road, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400012, India.Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, IndiaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, IndiaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, IndiaStatistician Department, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, IndiaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, IndiaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, IndiaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, IndiaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, IndiaBackground: Randomized controlled trials (RCT) of scalp cooling (SC) to prevent chemotherapy induced alopecia (CIA) did not evaluate its effect on hair regrowth (HR) and was conducted in a predominantly taxane (T) treated population. We conducted an RCT of SC in a setting of anthracycline (A) and taxane chemotherapy (CT) and assessed its effect on CIA and HR. Methods: Non-metastatic breast cancer women undergoing (neo) adjuvant CT were randomized to receive SC using the Paxman scalp cooling system during every cycle of CT, or no SC. The primary end point (PEP) was successful hair preservation (HP) assessed clinically and by review of photographs after CT. HR was assessed at 6 and 12 weeks. Results: 51 patients were randomized to SC (34) or control arm (17) in a 2:1 ratio. Twenty-five (49%) patients received A followed by T and the two arms were balanced with respect to this factor. HP rate was significantly higher in SC arm compared to control arm (56.3% vs 0%, P = 0.000004). HR was higher in SC arm compared to control at 6 weeks (89% vs 12%; P < 0.001) and 12 weeks (100% vs 59%, P = 0.0003). Loss of hair at PEP evaluation, which was a quality of life measure, was significantly lower in SC versus control arm (45% vs 82%, P = 0.016). There were no grade 3–4 cold related adverse effects. Conclusions: Women with breast cancer receiving A or T chemotherapy receiving SC were significantly more likely to have less than 50% hair loss after CT, superior hair regrowth and improvement in patient reported outcomes, with acceptable tolerance. It merits wider usage.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960977619311117Scalp coolingChemotherapyAlopeciaBreast cancerQuality of life |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
J. Bajpai S. Kagwade A. Chandrasekharan S. Dandekar S. Kanan Y. Kembhavi J. Ghosh S.D. Banavali S. Gupta |
spellingShingle |
J. Bajpai S. Kagwade A. Chandrasekharan S. Dandekar S. Kanan Y. Kembhavi J. Ghosh S.D. Banavali S. Gupta “Randomised controlled trial of scalp cooling for the prevention of chemotherapy induced alopecia” Breast Scalp cooling Chemotherapy Alopecia Breast cancer Quality of life |
author_facet |
J. Bajpai S. Kagwade A. Chandrasekharan S. Dandekar S. Kanan Y. Kembhavi J. Ghosh S.D. Banavali S. Gupta |
author_sort |
J. Bajpai |
title |
“Randomised controlled trial of scalp cooling for the prevention of chemotherapy induced alopecia” |
title_short |
“Randomised controlled trial of scalp cooling for the prevention of chemotherapy induced alopecia” |
title_full |
“Randomised controlled trial of scalp cooling for the prevention of chemotherapy induced alopecia” |
title_fullStr |
“Randomised controlled trial of scalp cooling for the prevention of chemotherapy induced alopecia” |
title_full_unstemmed |
“Randomised controlled trial of scalp cooling for the prevention of chemotherapy induced alopecia” |
title_sort |
“randomised controlled trial of scalp cooling for the prevention of chemotherapy induced alopecia” |
publisher |
Elsevier |
series |
Breast |
issn |
1532-3080 |
publishDate |
2020-02-01 |
description |
Background: Randomized controlled trials (RCT) of scalp cooling (SC) to prevent chemotherapy induced alopecia (CIA) did not evaluate its effect on hair regrowth (HR) and was conducted in a predominantly taxane (T) treated population. We conducted an RCT of SC in a setting of anthracycline (A) and taxane chemotherapy (CT) and assessed its effect on CIA and HR. Methods: Non-metastatic breast cancer women undergoing (neo) adjuvant CT were randomized to receive SC using the Paxman scalp cooling system during every cycle of CT, or no SC. The primary end point (PEP) was successful hair preservation (HP) assessed clinically and by review of photographs after CT. HR was assessed at 6 and 12 weeks. Results: 51 patients were randomized to SC (34) or control arm (17) in a 2:1 ratio. Twenty-five (49%) patients received A followed by T and the two arms were balanced with respect to this factor. HP rate was significantly higher in SC arm compared to control arm (56.3% vs 0%, P = 0.000004). HR was higher in SC arm compared to control at 6 weeks (89% vs 12%; P < 0.001) and 12 weeks (100% vs 59%, P = 0.0003). Loss of hair at PEP evaluation, which was a quality of life measure, was significantly lower in SC versus control arm (45% vs 82%, P = 0.016). There were no grade 3–4 cold related adverse effects. Conclusions: Women with breast cancer receiving A or T chemotherapy receiving SC were significantly more likely to have less than 50% hair loss after CT, superior hair regrowth and improvement in patient reported outcomes, with acceptable tolerance. It merits wider usage. |
topic |
Scalp cooling Chemotherapy Alopecia Breast cancer Quality of life |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960977619311117 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jbajpai randomisedcontrolledtrialofscalpcoolingforthepreventionofchemotherapyinducedalopecia AT skagwade randomisedcontrolledtrialofscalpcoolingforthepreventionofchemotherapyinducedalopecia AT achandrasekharan randomisedcontrolledtrialofscalpcoolingforthepreventionofchemotherapyinducedalopecia AT sdandekar randomisedcontrolledtrialofscalpcoolingforthepreventionofchemotherapyinducedalopecia AT skanan randomisedcontrolledtrialofscalpcoolingforthepreventionofchemotherapyinducedalopecia AT ykembhavi randomisedcontrolledtrialofscalpcoolingforthepreventionofchemotherapyinducedalopecia AT jghosh randomisedcontrolledtrialofscalpcoolingforthepreventionofchemotherapyinducedalopecia AT sdbanavali randomisedcontrolledtrialofscalpcoolingforthepreventionofchemotherapyinducedalopecia AT sgupta randomisedcontrolledtrialofscalpcoolingforthepreventionofchemotherapyinducedalopecia |
_version_ |
1724430812354445312 |