“Randomised controlled trial of scalp cooling for the prevention of chemotherapy induced alopecia”

Background: Randomized controlled trials (RCT) of scalp cooling (SC) to prevent chemotherapy induced alopecia (CIA) did not evaluate its effect on hair regrowth (HR) and was conducted in a predominantly taxane (T) treated population. We conducted an RCT of SC in a setting of anthracycline (A) and ta...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: J. Bajpai, S. Kagwade, A. Chandrasekharan, S. Dandekar, S. Kanan, Y. Kembhavi, J. Ghosh, S.D. Banavali, S. Gupta
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2020-02-01
Series:Breast
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960977619311117
id doaj-f7e7ad0ebb024748aa3419587b14117c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f7e7ad0ebb024748aa3419587b14117c2020-11-25T04:06:46ZengElsevierBreast1532-30802020-02-0149187193“Randomised controlled trial of scalp cooling for the prevention of chemotherapy induced alopecia”J. Bajpai0S. Kagwade1A. Chandrasekharan2S. Dandekar3S. Kanan4Y. Kembhavi5J. Ghosh6S.D. Banavali7S. Gupta8Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India; Corresponding author. Dr. Jyoti Bajpai Department of Medical Oncology Tata Memorial hospital, Dr. E Borges Road, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400012, India.Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, IndiaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, IndiaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, IndiaStatistician Department, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, IndiaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, IndiaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, IndiaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, IndiaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, IndiaBackground: Randomized controlled trials (RCT) of scalp cooling (SC) to prevent chemotherapy induced alopecia (CIA) did not evaluate its effect on hair regrowth (HR) and was conducted in a predominantly taxane (T) treated population. We conducted an RCT of SC in a setting of anthracycline (A) and taxane chemotherapy (CT) and assessed its effect on CIA and HR. Methods: Non-metastatic breast cancer women undergoing (neo) adjuvant CT were randomized to receive SC using the Paxman scalp cooling system during every cycle of CT, or no SC. The primary end point (PEP) was successful hair preservation (HP) assessed clinically and by review of photographs after CT. HR was assessed at 6 and 12 weeks. Results: 51 patients were randomized to SC (34) or control arm (17) in a 2:1 ratio. Twenty-five (49%) patients received A followed by T and the two arms were balanced with respect to this factor. HP rate was significantly higher in SC arm compared to control arm (56.3% vs 0%, P = 0.000004). HR was higher in SC arm compared to control at 6 weeks (89% vs 12%; P < 0.001) and 12 weeks (100% vs 59%, P = 0.0003). Loss of hair at PEP evaluation, which was a quality of life measure, was significantly lower in SC versus control arm (45% vs 82%, P = 0.016). There were no grade 3–4 cold related adverse effects. Conclusions: Women with breast cancer receiving A or T chemotherapy receiving SC were significantly more likely to have less than 50% hair loss after CT, superior hair regrowth and improvement in patient reported outcomes, with acceptable tolerance. It merits wider usage.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960977619311117Scalp coolingChemotherapyAlopeciaBreast cancerQuality of life
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author J. Bajpai
S. Kagwade
A. Chandrasekharan
S. Dandekar
S. Kanan
Y. Kembhavi
J. Ghosh
S.D. Banavali
S. Gupta
spellingShingle J. Bajpai
S. Kagwade
A. Chandrasekharan
S. Dandekar
S. Kanan
Y. Kembhavi
J. Ghosh
S.D. Banavali
S. Gupta
“Randomised controlled trial of scalp cooling for the prevention of chemotherapy induced alopecia”
Breast
Scalp cooling
Chemotherapy
Alopecia
Breast cancer
Quality of life
author_facet J. Bajpai
S. Kagwade
A. Chandrasekharan
S. Dandekar
S. Kanan
Y. Kembhavi
J. Ghosh
S.D. Banavali
S. Gupta
author_sort J. Bajpai
title “Randomised controlled trial of scalp cooling for the prevention of chemotherapy induced alopecia”
title_short “Randomised controlled trial of scalp cooling for the prevention of chemotherapy induced alopecia”
title_full “Randomised controlled trial of scalp cooling for the prevention of chemotherapy induced alopecia”
title_fullStr “Randomised controlled trial of scalp cooling for the prevention of chemotherapy induced alopecia”
title_full_unstemmed “Randomised controlled trial of scalp cooling for the prevention of chemotherapy induced alopecia”
title_sort “randomised controlled trial of scalp cooling for the prevention of chemotherapy induced alopecia”
publisher Elsevier
series Breast
issn 1532-3080
publishDate 2020-02-01
description Background: Randomized controlled trials (RCT) of scalp cooling (SC) to prevent chemotherapy induced alopecia (CIA) did not evaluate its effect on hair regrowth (HR) and was conducted in a predominantly taxane (T) treated population. We conducted an RCT of SC in a setting of anthracycline (A) and taxane chemotherapy (CT) and assessed its effect on CIA and HR. Methods: Non-metastatic breast cancer women undergoing (neo) adjuvant CT were randomized to receive SC using the Paxman scalp cooling system during every cycle of CT, or no SC. The primary end point (PEP) was successful hair preservation (HP) assessed clinically and by review of photographs after CT. HR was assessed at 6 and 12 weeks. Results: 51 patients were randomized to SC (34) or control arm (17) in a 2:1 ratio. Twenty-five (49%) patients received A followed by T and the two arms were balanced with respect to this factor. HP rate was significantly higher in SC arm compared to control arm (56.3% vs 0%, P = 0.000004). HR was higher in SC arm compared to control at 6 weeks (89% vs 12%; P < 0.001) and 12 weeks (100% vs 59%, P = 0.0003). Loss of hair at PEP evaluation, which was a quality of life measure, was significantly lower in SC versus control arm (45% vs 82%, P = 0.016). There were no grade 3–4 cold related adverse effects. Conclusions: Women with breast cancer receiving A or T chemotherapy receiving SC were significantly more likely to have less than 50% hair loss after CT, superior hair regrowth and improvement in patient reported outcomes, with acceptable tolerance. It merits wider usage.
topic Scalp cooling
Chemotherapy
Alopecia
Breast cancer
Quality of life
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960977619311117
work_keys_str_mv AT jbajpai randomisedcontrolledtrialofscalpcoolingforthepreventionofchemotherapyinducedalopecia
AT skagwade randomisedcontrolledtrialofscalpcoolingforthepreventionofchemotherapyinducedalopecia
AT achandrasekharan randomisedcontrolledtrialofscalpcoolingforthepreventionofchemotherapyinducedalopecia
AT sdandekar randomisedcontrolledtrialofscalpcoolingforthepreventionofchemotherapyinducedalopecia
AT skanan randomisedcontrolledtrialofscalpcoolingforthepreventionofchemotherapyinducedalopecia
AT ykembhavi randomisedcontrolledtrialofscalpcoolingforthepreventionofchemotherapyinducedalopecia
AT jghosh randomisedcontrolledtrialofscalpcoolingforthepreventionofchemotherapyinducedalopecia
AT sdbanavali randomisedcontrolledtrialofscalpcoolingforthepreventionofchemotherapyinducedalopecia
AT sgupta randomisedcontrolledtrialofscalpcoolingforthepreventionofchemotherapyinducedalopecia
_version_ 1724430812354445312