Dublin Core, DSpace, and a Brief Analysis of Three University Repositories

This paper provides an overview of Dublin Core (DC) and DSpace together with an examination of the institutional repositories of three public research universities. The universities all use DC and DSpace to create and manage their repositories. I drew a sampling of records from each repository and e...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mary Kurtz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American Library Association 2010-03-01
Series:Information Technology and Libraries
Online Access:https://ejournals.bc.edu/ojs/index.php/ital/article/view/3157
id doaj-f7f12bcaea86496b8fc86c2dca56152f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f7f12bcaea86496b8fc86c2dca56152f2020-11-24T23:36:30ZengAmerican Library AssociationInformation Technology and Libraries0730-92952163-52262010-03-01291404610.6017/ital.v29i1.31572825Dublin Core, DSpace, and a Brief Analysis of Three University RepositoriesMary KurtzThis paper provides an overview of Dublin Core (DC) and DSpace together with an examination of the institutional repositories of three public research universities. The universities all use DC and DSpace to create and manage their repositories. I drew a sampling of records from each repository and examined them for metadata quality using the criteria of completeness, accuracy, and consistency. I also examined the quality of records with reference to the methods of educating repository users. One repository used librarians to oversee the archiving process, while the other two employed two different strategies as part of the selfarchiving process. The librarian-overseen archive had the most complete and accurate records for DSpace entries.https://ejournals.bc.edu/ojs/index.php/ital/article/view/3157
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mary Kurtz
spellingShingle Mary Kurtz
Dublin Core, DSpace, and a Brief Analysis of Three University Repositories
Information Technology and Libraries
author_facet Mary Kurtz
author_sort Mary Kurtz
title Dublin Core, DSpace, and a Brief Analysis of Three University Repositories
title_short Dublin Core, DSpace, and a Brief Analysis of Three University Repositories
title_full Dublin Core, DSpace, and a Brief Analysis of Three University Repositories
title_fullStr Dublin Core, DSpace, and a Brief Analysis of Three University Repositories
title_full_unstemmed Dublin Core, DSpace, and a Brief Analysis of Three University Repositories
title_sort dublin core, dspace, and a brief analysis of three university repositories
publisher American Library Association
series Information Technology and Libraries
issn 0730-9295
2163-5226
publishDate 2010-03-01
description This paper provides an overview of Dublin Core (DC) and DSpace together with an examination of the institutional repositories of three public research universities. The universities all use DC and DSpace to create and manage their repositories. I drew a sampling of records from each repository and examined them for metadata quality using the criteria of completeness, accuracy, and consistency. I also examined the quality of records with reference to the methods of educating repository users. One repository used librarians to oversee the archiving process, while the other two employed two different strategies as part of the selfarchiving process. The librarian-overseen archive had the most complete and accurate records for DSpace entries.
url https://ejournals.bc.edu/ojs/index.php/ital/article/view/3157
work_keys_str_mv AT marykurtz dublincoredspaceandabriefanalysisofthreeuniversityrepositories
_version_ 1725523271264239616