The efficacy of intense pulsed light and heat energy therapy compared to benzoyl peroxide gel 2.5% in the treatment of mild and moderate acne vulgaris
The use of technology-based light therapies such as intense pulsed light and heat energy (IPL) provides an alternative therapy for patients with acne. However, clinical evidence is required to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the IPL. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of IPL compared to b...
Main Authors: | Triasari Oktavriana, Agnes Sri Siswati, Kristiana Etnawati |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universitas Gadjah Mada
2016-06-01
|
Series: | Journal of the Medical Sciences |
Online Access: | https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/bik/article/view/11526 |
Similar Items
-
Efficacy of intense-pulsed light therapy with topical benzoyl peroxide 5% versus benzoyl peroxide 5% alone in mild-to-moderate acne vulgaris: A randomized controlled trial
by: Fatemeh Mokhtari, et al.
Published: (2017-01-01) -
Topical 0.1% adapalene gel versus 0.1% adapalene and 2.5% benzoyl peroxide combination gel in the treatment of mild-to-moderate acne vulgaris: An open-label randomized controlled pilot study
by: Madai Puthiyaveedu Amrutha, et al.
Published: (2021-01-01) -
Profile of clindamycin phosphate 1.2%/benzoyl peroxide 3.75% aqueous gel for the treatment of acne vulgaris
by: Nguyen TA, et al.
Published: (2015-10-01) -
The relationship between serum malondialdehyde levels and severity of acne vulgaris on male
by: Aprilina Dwi Sulistyowati, Dwi Retno Adiwinarni, Kristiana Etnawati
Published: (2015-09-01) -
The effectiveness of adapalene 0.1% with intense pulsed light versus benzoyl peroxide 5% with intense pulsed light in the treatment of acne vulgaris: A comparative study
by: Fatemeh Mokhtari, et al.
Published: (2019-01-01)